ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07726823Updated Jul 24, 2026

Comparative Effects of Mulligan Bent Leg Raise Versus Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement in Lumbar Radiculopathy

An interventional study of Mulligan Bent Leg Raise (MBLR) and Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement (SMWLM) in Lumbar Radiculopathy, sponsored by Riphah International University. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-24.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lumbar radiculopathy is a spinal nerve root disorder often caused by lumbar disc herniation or compression, leading to radiating leg pain, restricted movement, and functional difficulties. This condition significantly disrupts daily activities and overall quality of life. While medication and exercise are common treatments, manual therapy techniques are gaining recognition for their non-invasive and effective outcomes in relieving symptoms and improving patient function.

Read the detailed description

This randomized clinical trial will be conducted in Physiotherapy outpatient department of Jinnah Hospital Lahore. It will include 52 participants, aged 20 to 40 years, meeting clinical criteria for lumbar radiculopathy. Participants will be selected from an outpatient physiotherapy department and assigned randomly into two equal groups. Group A will receive the MBLR technique, while Group B will undergo the SMWLM technique. Both interventions will be applied three times a week for four weeks under standardized protocols. Key outcome measures include pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), neural mobility evaluated through the Straight Leg Raise (SLR) and Slump Test, and functional status measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and 5 Repetition Sit-to-Stand test for postural balance. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, after 2 weeks, at 4 weeks post-intervention, and at 8-week follow-up. Data analysis will be done by SPSS version 25. To ensure objectivity, all assessments will be conducted while keeping the patient unaware of their group assignment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Radiculopathy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neural Mobilization
  • Mulligan Technique
  • Manual Therapy
03

In context

Radiculopathy

483 studies on the registry are indexed under Radiculopathy; 145 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 60 across 373 interventional studies indexed under Radiculopathy.

Browse Radiculopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,193 studies on the registry; 650 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 20 to 40 years (26)
  • Diagnosed patient with Unilateral Lumbar Radiculopathy secondary to L4/L5 and L5/S1 lumbar posterolateral disc buldge confirmed on MRI (12)
  • Posterolateral Lumbar Radiculopathy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Presence of red flags (e.g., cauda equina syndrome, severe neurological deficits).

      • Previous spinal surgery within 1 year.
      • Severe osteoporosis or vertebral fractures.
      • Pregnant women.
      • Systemic inflammatory or diseases.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mulligan Bent Leg Raise (MBLR)

    The Mulligan Bent Leg Raise (BLR) technique is a specialized physical therapy mobilization method used to relieve low back pain, reduce sciatica, and improve hamstring flexibility. It involves applying gentle, pain-free traction while moving the leg through progressively greater ranges of hip flexion.

    Other: Mulligan Bent Leg Raise (MBLR)

  • Active comparator
    Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM)

    Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) is an advanced manual therapy technique developed as part of the Mulligan Concept. It integrates manual joint mobilization with neurodynamic principles to treat lower back and radiating leg pain, most notably lumbar radiculopathy (sciatica)

    Other: Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement (SMWLM)

Interventions

  • OtherMulligan Bent Leg Raise (MBLR)

    Patient Position - Supine at edge of plinth * Affected hip and knee flexed to 90° * Hand of affected side under head and neck Therapist Position - Stands in walk stance, lateral to affected limb Therapist Hand Placement - Inner shoulder under popliteal fossa * Both hands grasp lower thigh Mobilization Procedure - Apply longitudinal traction along femur * Flex hip toward same side shoulder until first resistance * Patient performs isometric hold (5 sec) * On relaxation, increase hip flexion if pain free * Hold new position \~20 sec * Repeat 3 times if tolerated Precautions - Maintain knee flexion * No need to stabilize opposite leg

  • OtherSpinal Mobilization With Leg Movement (SMWLM)

    Patient Position - Side-lying on unaffected side near edge * Affected leg on top, supported by assistant * Hip abducted \~10°, extended; knee flexed \~45° Therapist Position - Primary therapist behind pelvis * Assistant supports upper leg during movement Therapist Hand Placement - Supported thumb on spinous process of affected vertebra * Gentle transverse pressure maintained throughout movement Mobilization Procedure - Assistant helps patient actively lift leg (SLR) * Movement within pain free range * If symptoms appear, hold for \~3 sec then return * Start with 3 reps; increase to 6 with light overpressure as tolerated Precautions - Stay within non painful range * Maintain steady, controlled transverse pressure * Avoid excessive force, especially early on

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. NPRS for pain

    Pain intensity will be evaluated using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, which ranges from 0 indicating "no pain" to 10 representing the "worst possible pain." It has shown excellent test-retest reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging between 0.95 and 0.98 in individuals with musculoskeletal conditions

    Time frame: upto 4 weeks

  2. SLR and Slump test for neural mobility

    To assess neural mobility, the Straight Leg Raise and Slump Tests will be employed. These are well-established clinical tools for identifying lumbar nerve root irritation. The SLR test demonstrates strong diagnostic accuracy (\~81%) and excellent inter-rater reliability with kappa values above 0.90 and aprox 0.71 for slump test

    Time frame: Upto 4 weeks

  3. Oswestry Disability Index test for functional outcome

    The ODI will be used to determine the level of functional disability associated with lower back pain. It includes 10 items that assess various aspects of daily activity. The tool has proven to be highly reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87) and valid across different patient populations with lumbar spine conditions

    Time frame: Upto 4 weeks

  4. Time up and go (TUG) test for functional outcome

    Balance and functional mobility will be measured using the TUG test, which involves timing a patient as they rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn, return, and sit down. This test is highly reliable (ICC = 0.82 to 0.99) and shows good concurrent validity in both spinal and geriatric populations (34). The cutoff value for balance and functional mobility TUG test is 7.2 sec

    Time frame: Upto 4 weeks

  5. Five repetition sit to stand test

    The 5 Rep Sit-to-Stand Test will be used to assess lower limb strength and functional performance. The patient gets to their maximum standing position and then sits back down five times as fast as they can without the use of their hands or arms. It has demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC \> 0.90) and shows strong correlation with functional ability (36). The cutoff value is \> 10 sec for 5 rep sitting to standing and standing to sitting transition

    Time frame: upto 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Femwell Physiocare Woman Rehab clinic
    Lahore, Punjab Province 54000, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Senol D, Erdem C, Canbolat M, Toy S, Karatas T, Baykara RA, Ozbag D, Akyurek G. Comparison of the effects of conventional physiotherapy and proprioception exercises on pain and ankle proprioception in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(2):421-428. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200361. PubMed 34308899 ↗
  • Ashraf B, Ahmad S, Ashraf K, Kanwal S, Ashraf S, Khan N, et al. Effectiveness of spinal mobilization with leg movement versus McKenzie back extension exercises in lumbar radiculopathy. 2021;15(5):1436-40.
  • Fatima A, Mehmood Z, Ahmad SJJoIIMC. Effects of Mulligan Traction Straight Leg Raise Versus Passive Straight Leg Raise in Lumbar Radiculopathy Patients. 2022;17(2):86-90.
  • Singh V, Malik MJRJoN. Lumbar radiculopathy managed with spinal mobilization with leg movement: A case study. 2021;20(2):246-9.
  • Naidu SP, Srikantaiah S, Boyle RJIJoPT, Research. Immediate Effect of Mulligan's Spinal Mobilization with Limb Movements on Straight Leg Raise Test in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 2023;5(1):66-72.
  • Singh V, Malik MJAiR. Effect of manual therapy on pain, disability and neural mobility in patients of lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc: a randomized controlled trial. 2022;36(3):11-8.
  • Yasmeen S, Ahmad Z, Ishtiaq NJJRCoRS. The comparative effects of Butler's neural tissue mobilization and Mulligan's Bent leg raise in patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy. 2022;10(02).
  • Lin LH, Lin TY, Chang KV, Wu WT, Ozcakar L. Neural Mobilization for Reducing Pain and Disability in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 26;13(12):2255. doi: 10.3390/life13122255. PubMed 38137856 ↗
  • Hussein H, Atteya M, Ansari A, Kamel E. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Mulligan Mobilization with Movement on Pain, Range of Motion, Function, and Flexibility in Patients with Sciatica. NeuroRehabilitation. 2025 Mar;56(2):83-96. doi: 10.1177/10538135241301693. Epub 2024 Dec 18. PubMed 40260717 ↗
  • George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP, Schneider MJ, Beneciuk JM, Lentz TA, Gilliam JR, Hendren S, Norman KS. Interventions for the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Revision 2021. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):CPG1-CPG60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304. PubMed 34719942 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07726823
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
Start date
Jun 20, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2026

Study contacts

Amna Zia, PhD*
Contact
amna.zia@kemu.edu.pk
03244686993
Samrood Akram, PhD*
Contact
samrood.akram@riphah.edu.pk
03324806143
Amna Zia, PhD
principal investigator · King Edward Medical University
Muniba Tahir
principal investigator · Riphah International University, Lahore Campus

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion