ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07717619Updated Jul 21, 2026

Antenatal High-Risk Pregnancy Intervention Bundle in Rural Nepal

An interventional study of High Risk Pregnancy Bundle in High Risk Pregnancy, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Nepal. Open to female participants aged 0 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-21.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The proposed study will assess and implement a comprehensive antenatal HRP screening and telehealth follow-up program in rural Nepal. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. To estimate the burden of HRPs using the existing Antenatal Risk-Score Checklist in rural Nepal
  2. Assess acceptability, feasibility, preliminary effectiveness, and implementation outcomes of the HRP bundle at the primary healthcare in Nepal
02

Conditions studied

  • High Risk Pregnancy

Keywords

  • high risk pregnancy
  • low and middle income countries
  • teleheatlh
  • pregnancy checklist
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • all pregnant women above who are receiving antenatal care at Melamchi Primary Health Care Center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • life-threatening maternal or fetal conditions requiring immediate tertiary-level care
  • unable to provide due to cognitive or language barriers
  • do not have access to a mobile phone for telehealth consultations.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    Usual prenatal care, including on-site consultation and visits from health facility staff

  • Active comparator
    High Risk Pregnancy (HRP) Bundle Intervention Arm

    The intervention arm would include 1. identification of high-risk pregnancy 2. Teleconsultation with expert consultant 3. weekly call with patient navigator 4. training of health care provider for HRP care, and 5. visits in the weekly prenatal telehealth clinic

    Other: High Risk Pregnancy Bundle

Interventions

  • OtherHigh Risk Pregnancy Bundle

    The intervention would include 1. identification of high-risk pregnancy 2. Teleconsultation with expert consultant 3. weekly call with patient navigator 4. training of health care provider for HRP care, and 5. visits in the weekly prenatal telehealth clinic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maternal Near Miss

    life-threatening complication during pregnancy, childbirth, or within 42 days postpartum, but survives with appropriate medical intervention (We will use WHO criteria)

    Time frame: up to 60 days postpartum

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neonatal death

    Number of neonatal deaths, defined as death of a liveborn infant within the first 28 days of life

    Time frame: Up to 28 days after birth

  2. Low Apgar Score at 5 Minutes

    Number of infants with an Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes after birth

    Time frame: At 5 minutes after birth

  3. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission

    Number of infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after birth

  4. Need for Mechanical Ventilation

    Number of infants requiring mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: up to 30 days after birth

  5. Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Number of infants diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after birth

  6. Neonatal Hypoglycemia

    Number of infants with hypoglycemia, defined as less than 45 mg/dl

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours after birth

  7. Low Birth Weight

    Number of infants with birth weight less than 2500 grams

    Time frame: At birth

  8. Composite Adverse Neonatal Outcome

    Number of infants with at least one of the following: neonatal death, Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes, NICU admission, need for mechanical ventilation, respiratory distress syndrome, hypoglycemia

    Time frame: up to 30 days after birth

  9. Antenatal Risk Screening Rate

    Proportion of pregnant women enrolled in the study who undergo antenatal risk screening using the Antenatal Risk-Score Checklist

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  10. Referral Rate

    Percentage of pregnant women referred to higher levels of care based on risks identified through antenatal risk screening

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  11. Telehealth Consultation Utilization Rate

    Proportion of pregnant women in the High Risk Pregnancy Bundle Intervention Arm who utilize at least 80% of their recommended telehealth consultations

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Score

    We will assess the acceptability of each intervention component (risk-screening scoring system, teleconsultation, weekly patient navigator calls, and provider training) using the mean total score and standard deviation (SD) of the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), administered at both the patient and provider level.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  2. Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Score

    We will assess the appropriateness of each intervention component (risk-screening scoring system, teleconsultation, weekly patient navigator calls, and provider training) using the mean total score and standard deviation (SD) of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), administered at both the patient and provider level.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  3. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Score

    We will assess the feasibility of each intervention component (risk-screening scoring system, teleconsultation, weekly patient navigator calls, and provider training) using the mean total score and standard deviation (SD) of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), administered at both the patient and provider level.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Melamchi Primary Health Care Center
    Melamchi, Bagmati, Nepal
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data will be shared, including quantitative survey data on primary outcomes (maternal near-miss) and secondary outcomes (maternal mortality, composite neonatal outcomes, stillbirth rate, preterm delivery, implementation outcomes), socio-demographic and reproductive health data, and chronic health condition data. Qualitative data (de-identified transcripts) from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews on implementation barriers and facilitators will also be shared. Process tracking data (service utilization records, monthly reports) may be shared in aggregate form. Personally identifiable information will be removed prior to sharing. Data will be shared in standard formats (e.g., Stata) in accordance with ICPSR standards, accompanied by a codebook and questionnaire to support interpretation.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Individual participant data and supporting information will be available beginning at the time of publication of the associated study results. Data will remain available indefinitely upon request following publication, with no specified end date.

Access criteria: De-identified data will be accessible to qualified researchers and program implementers who submit a formal data request and agree to comply with applicable ethical guidelines and data use terms. Requestors will have access to de-identified quantitative datasets, qualitative transcripts, and associated metadata (questionnaire, codebook). Potentially identifying variables will be classified under restricted access and made available only through a secure virtual data enclave (e.g., DSDR/ICPSR) for approved researchers. Data will be archived on a secure server at Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital, with a backup at UCSF. Requests will be reviewed by the study's Principal Investigators or designated project coordinator. A Certificate of Confidentiality will safeguard participant information throughout the access process.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Jul 2027, 11 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 25, 2026
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2028
Last update
Jul 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07717619
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 21, 2026

Study contacts

Anju Ranjit, MD MPH
Contact
anju.ranjit@ucsf.edu
4153533400
Archana Shrestha, PhD
Contact
archana@kusms.edu.np
+9779801002245
Anju Ranjit, MD MPH
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
Archana Shrestha
principal investigator · Kathmandu University School of Medicine/Dhulikhel Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion