CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07716358Updated Jul 21, 2026

Comparison Of Preoperative Ultrasound Guided Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Proximal Femur Fractures Before Positioning for Spinal Anaesthesia

An interventional study of Femoral Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Nerve Block in Proximal Femur Fractures and Nerve Block Assessment, sponsored by Sahara Medical College Narowal Pakistan. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-21.

Sponsored by Sahara Medical College Narowal Pakistan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Proximal femur fractures are among the most painful orthopedic injuries Adequate analgesia is essential to facilitate positioning for spinal anesthesia, reduce opioid requirements, and minimize related complications. The aim of study to compare the analgesic efficacy of preoperative ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliac Block Versus and Femoral Nerve Block in patients with proximal femur fractures prior to positioning for spinal anesthesia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Proximal Femur Fractures
  • Nerve Block Assessment

Keywords

  • Femoral Nerve block
  • Fascia Iliac Compartment Block
  • visual analogue scale
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA I\&II status patients coming for proximal femur fracture surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of neurological disease (Alzheimer, dementia),
  • Patients with known contraindication to regional anaesthesia (e.g., signs of infection at site of block, coagulation abnormality i.e. INR >1.55, platelet count \<80,000)
  • Patients with ASA III and IV status and patients with Known allergy to the study drug were excluded from study.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
84 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A Participants who received Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block

    Participants in group-A were 42 which were assigned randomly and Femoral Nerve Block was done before spinal anaesthesia.

    Procedure: Femoral Nerve Block

  • Active comparator
    Group B Participants who received Ultrasound Guided Fascia Iliaca Block

    Participants in group- B were 42 which were assigned randomly and Fascia Iliaca Block was done before spinal anaesthesia.

    Procedure: Fascia Iliaca Nerve Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureFemoral Nerve Block

    FNB was carried out as follows: the linear probe was kept in a "in line plane" approach to identify the femoral artery under ultrasound guidance. The triangular, hyperechoic femoral nerve was identified as being situated lateral to the femoral artery. The femoral artery was positioned next to an insulated 22 G needle. Once the needle tip was located and a negative blood aspiration was obtained, a little amount of local anesthetic (injection bupivacaine 0.25%) was administered. The remaining drug volume was injected based on weight (0.5 ml/kg) once the local anesthetic distribution was observed

  • ProcedureFascia Iliaca Nerve Block

    The FICB was administered as described. We found the psoas muscle lateral to the femoral nerve. The iliacus fascia, which extends deep into the fascia Lata, covers it. Consequently, a double pop was felt after inserting the needle until it was between the psoas muscle and the fascia iliaca. As with the previously described method, 1 mL of the local aesthetic solution was injected, and following a negative blood aspiration, the medication disseminated beneath the fascia iliaca.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Control

    In patients with proximal femur fractures pain assessment was done baseline before blocks and at five minutes after blocks administration. Pain control assessment was done based on Visual Analogue Scale from 0-10.

    Time frame: 05 minutes

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Sughra Shafi Medical Complex
    Chak Ninety-five North Branch, Punjab Province 51600, Pakistan
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07716358
Lead sponsor
Sahara Medical College Narowal Pakistan
Responsible party
Dr Rafia Kousar (Principal Investigator, Sahara Medical College Narowal Pakistan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026
Completion
Jun 30, 2026
Last update
Jul 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion