CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07709182Updated Jul 16, 2026

Airway Occlusion Pressure (P0.1) Guided Pressure Support Ventilation Versus Conventional Management in Weaning Window Patients

An interventional study of Pressure support ventilation protocol and Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1)-guided pressure support ventilation (PSV) in Airway Occlusion Pressure, Pressure Support Ventilation and Conventional Management, sponsored by Tanta University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2026, registered Jul 2026).
  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine whether Airway Occlusion Pressure (P0.1) Guided Pressure Support Ventilation is superior to conventional management for patients in weaning windows.

Read the detailed description

Mechanical ventilation is an essential modality for critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure. It supports gas exchange and reduces respiratory muscle workload, but prolonged use increases the risk of lung injury, diaphragm dysfunction, and infection. Therefore, the process of ventilator weaning is crucial in optimizing patient outcomes.

Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), the negative pressure generated 100 ms after the onset of inspiration during an occluded breath, provides a direct measurement of patient respiratory drive independent of lung mechanics. It is a strong indicator of ventilatory demand and drive-load imbalance.

Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) is commonly used during the weaning window, but conventional titration methods rely on clinical assessment alone. These methods do not reliably identify asynchronous events such as ineffective effort, double triggering, or premature cycling, which prolong ventilation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Airway Occlusion Pressure
  • Pressure Support Ventilation
  • Conventional Management
  • Weaning Window Patients
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 963 studies on the registry; 304 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Mechanically ventilated adult patients ≥ 21 years.
  • Patients on pressure support ventilation for at least 24 hours and clinically determined to be in the weaning window (transition between assisted ventilation and spontaneous ventilation) with improving respiratory status.
  • Hemodynamically stable [mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥60 mmHg].
  • All patients will be required to have light sedation with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -1 and 0 to allow reliable assessment of respiratory drive.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neuromuscular disorders affecting respiratory drive
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score below 8
  • Cervical spinal cord injury
  • Receipt of neuromuscular blockers within the previous 24 hours
  • Morbid obesity resulting in unreliable respiratory mechanics
  • Pregnancy
  • Deep sedation defined as RASS ≤ -2
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring escalating vasopressor support.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group I (Control Group)

    Patients will receive a conventional pressure support ventilation protocol.

    Other: Pressure support ventilation protocol

  • Experimental
    Group II (Study Group)

    Patients will receive airway occlusion pressure (P0.1)-guided pressure support ventilation (PSV).

    Other: Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1)-guided pressure support ventilation (PSV)

Interventions

  • OtherPressure support ventilation protocol

    Patients will receive a conventional pressure support ventilation protocol.

  • OtherAirway occlusion pressure (P0.1)-guided pressure support ventilation (PSV)

    Patients will receive airway occlusion pressure (P0.1)-guided pressure support ventilation (PSV).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ventilator-Free Days

    Ventilator-Free Days (VFD) at Day 28, defined as the number of days a patient is free from mechanical ventilation within the first 28 days after randomization. VFD are calculated as 28 minus the total days on mechanical ventilation from Day 0 until successful extubation.

    Time frame: Day 28 after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    Duration of Mechanical Ventilation (DMV) is defined as the total days on mechanical ventilation (MV) from randomization until final successful extubation.

    Time frame: Till final successful extubation (Up to 48 hours)

  2. Length of stay in the intensive care unit

    The length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) will be recorded from ICU admission to ICU discharge.

    Time frame: Till the discharge from intensive care unit (Up to 28 days)

  3. Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony Index (PVAI)

    Daily analysis of a 10-minute waveform segment. "PVAI"="Asynchronous events" /"Total breaths" ×100

    Time frame: Day 28 after the procedure

  4. Dexmedetomidine requirement

    Total dose of dexmedetomidine administered to maintain the target sedation level of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) -1 to 0 during the weaning period.

    Time frame: Day 28 after the procedure

  5. Failed weaning

    "Failed weaning" is defined as reintubation within 48 hours after extubation.

    Time frame: 48 hours after extubation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Tanta University
    Tanta, Al Gharbia 31527, Egypt
    • Muhammad A Kandil, MSc · Contact · muhammad.kandil@med.tanta.edu.eg · 00201022644722
    • Sohair M Soliman, MD · Sub investigator
    • Ghada F Elbaradey, MD · Sub investigator
    • Taysser M Abdalraheem, MD · Sub investigator
    • Aliaa M Belal, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07709182
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Muhammad Ahmed Kandil (Assistant Lecturer of Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt., Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Study contacts

Muhammad A Kandil, MSc
Contact
muhammad.kandil@med.tanta.edu.eg
00201022644722

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion