CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07701356Updated Jul 14, 2026

The Effectiveness of Joint Mobilization in Stiff Hand Treatment

An interventional study of Joint Mobilization with Conventional Physiotherapy and Conventional Physiotherapy Only in Stiff Hand, sponsored by Pamukkale University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-14.

Sponsored by Pamukkale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Jul 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Although various treatment modalities have been investigated for the management of stiff hand, no previous study has examined the combined use of exercise and joint mobilization. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the effects of peripheral joint mobilization, applied in addition to conventional exercise, on functional outcomes in patients with stiff hand.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stiff Hand

Keywords

  • joint mobilization
  • hand function
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Pamukkale University is the lead sponsor of 331 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Hand or forearm injury managed conservatively or surgically
  • Stiff hand criteria confirmed by Modified Weeks Test (0-20° difference between pre- and post-conditioning passive ROM)
  • No communication impairment
  • No prior neurological, orthopedic, or rheumatological condition or surgery in the affected extremity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Circulatory disorder or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
  • Dupuytren's disease
  • Acute inflammation in any finger within the last week
  • Fracture due to non-traumatic causes
  • Significant edema
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Joint mobilization with conventional physiotherapy

    Other: Joint Mobilization with Conventional Physiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Physiotherapy Only

    Other: Conventional Physiotherapy Only

Interventions

  • OtherJoint Mobilization with Conventional Physiotherapy

    Participants received conventional physiotherapy program (classical massage, scar massage, active and resistive hand-wrist exercises, adhesive bandage for edema control) in addition to joint mobilization. Joint mobilization was initiated at minimum 6 weeks post-injury or surgery. Participants were seated with forearm in neutral position. The joint proximal to the mobilized segment was stabilized. Distraction force was applied in the distal direction. Volar glides (8-12 repetitions) were applied for flexion deficits and dorsal glides for extension deficits according to the convex-concave rule, with each glide held at end range for approximately 30 seconds. Mobilization was applied for 4-6 minutes per joint. Total session duration: approximately 30 minutes. Frequency: 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total).

  • OtherConventional Physiotherapy Only

    Participants received conventional physiotherapy program consisting of classical massage, scar massage, active and resistive hand-wrist exercises, and adhesive bandage for edema control. Total session duration: approximately 30 minutes. Frequency: 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Range of Motion

    Total Active Motion (TAM) assessed by metal finger goniometer.

    Time frame: Assessments were performed at baseline, at the end of treatment (4 weeks), and at the 8-week follow-up.

  2. Grip Strength

    Grip Strength was assessed by Jamar dynamometer (gross grip, pinch, pulp, lateral, tripod)

    Time frame: Assessments were performed at baseline, at the end of treatment (4 weeks), and at the 8-week follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire

    This questionnaire evaluates the functionality of the hand and consists of 63 questions in total. Each question is scoredbetween 1-5 and the score of each section varies between 0-100. High total score indicates high satisfaction.

    Time frame: Assessments were performed at baseline, at the end of treatment (4 weeks), and at the 8-week follow-up.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pamukkale University
    Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Glasgow C, Tooth LR, Fleming J. Mobilizing the stiff hand: combining theory and evidence to improve clinical outcomes. J Hand Ther. 2010 Oct-Dec;23(4):392-400; quiz 401. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Sep 9. PubMed 20828988 ↗
  • Weeks PM, Wray RC Jr, Kuxhaus M. The results of non-operative management of stiff joints in the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978 Jan;61(1):58-63. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197801000-00010. PubMed 145602 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07701356
Lead sponsor
Pamukkale University
Responsible party
UMUT ERASLAN (Assistant Professor, Pamukkale University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2026
Start date
Jan 24, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 11, 2026
Completion
Mar 11, 2026
Last update
Jul 14, 2026

Study contacts

Umut Eraslan
principal investigator · Pamukkale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion