CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07697027Updated Jul 10, 2026

A Study on the Effects of Instability Resistance Training on Dynamic Balance and Rapid Change-of-Direction Ability in College Basketball Recruits

An interventional study of Unstable Resistance Training Group and Traditional Resistance Training in Training, Male and Athletes, sponsored by Richen Sun. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to male participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by Richen Sun · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Jun 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This experiment aims to investigate the effects of unstable resistance training on the dynamic balance ability and rapid directional change mobility of college basketball majors, while comparing it with traditional resistance training to analyze the statistical differences between the two in enhancing the dynamic balance ability and rapid directional change mobility of the majors-Parazacco spilurus subsp. spilurus-and to explore the underlying reasons, thereby opening new research avenues for improving the dynamic balance ability and rapid directional change mobility of college majors.

Read the detailed description

All participants completed a 12-week training program, training three times per week with at least a 48-hour interval between consecutive training sessions. Depending on their group assignment, participants performed either unstable resistance training (experimental group) or traditional resistance training on a stable surface (control group). Both groups followed the same training frequency, training volume, exercise sequence, and rest intervals between sets; the only difference was the training surface. During training, the experimental group used unstable equipment such as BOSU balls, balance pads, and Swiss balls, while the control group performed the corresponding exercises on a stable floor. All training sessions were uniformly supervised by researchers to ensure proper form and training adherence.

Each training session began with a standardized warm-up, including 5 minutes of light jogging and dynamic stretching, followed by exercise-specific warm-up movements. Prior to the formal training, participants completed one set of adaptation exercises at approximately 50% of the formal training load. Rest periods between exercises were 30 seconds, while rest periods between sets were controlled at 45-60 seconds depending on the training phase.

The experimental group's training program was divided into three cycles. Weeks 1 through 4 constituted the basic adaptation phase, with training consisting of BOSU ball elbow plank (40 s × 4 sets), squats on a balance pad (10 reps × 4 sets), back-against-Swiss-ball squats with ball between the knees (40 s × 4 sets), and swan-pose balance on the BOSU ball (30 s × 4 sets), with 45 s of rest between sets. Weeks 5 through 8 constitute the enhancement phase, with training consisting of weighted squats on a balance pad (15 reps × 4 sets), weighted deadlifts on a balance pad (10 reps × 4 sets), alternating lunges on a BOSU ball (15 reps × 4 sets), and medicine ball lunge twists with toss and catch (with the front leg on the BOSU ball) (12 reps × 4 sets), with a 45-second rest between sets. Weeks 9 through 12 constitute the consolidation phase, with training consisting of weighted single-leg deadlifts on a balance pad (12 reps × 4 sets), weighted crunches on a BOSU ball (12 reps × 4 sets), weighted Russian twists on the BOSU ball (12 reps × 4 sets), and weighted Bulgarian split squats on the BOSU ball (12 reps × 4 sets), with 60 s of rest between sets.

The control group underwent traditional resistance training on a stable surface, with the same training cycle and training volume as the experimental group. Weeks 1 through 4 consisted of elbow plank (40 s × 4 sets), single-leg lifts on a flat surface (10 reps × 4 sets), static squats with a ball held against a wall (40 s × 4 sets), and swan pose balance on the floor (30 s × 4 sets); Weeks 5 through 8: squats (15 reps × 4 sets), weighted single-leg lifts (10 reps × 4 sets), weighted alternating lunges (15 reps × 4 sets), and medicine ball lunge twists with toss and catch (12 reps × 4 sets); Weeks 9 through 12 consisted of weighted squats (12 reps × 4 sets), weighted crunches (12 reps × 4 sets), weighted Russian twists (12 reps × 4 sets), and weighted Bulgarian split squats (12 reps × 4 sets), with rest intervals of 45 s and 60 s between sets, respectively. The experimental instruments and their models used during the experiment were as follows: stopwatch (PC2810, China), measuring tape (JGW-5m, China) , a whistle (PE-001, China), marker cones (KS-TC23, China), a Y Balance Test Kit™ (USA), a BOSU ball (SH-BOSU58, China), a balance mat (SH-BP34, China), 5 kg dumbbells (SH-DB5, China), a 5 kg medicine ball (SH-MB5, China), barbell plates (SH-WP5, China), and 65 cm Swiss balls (SH-GB65, China).

02

Conditions studied

  • Training
  • Male
  • Athletes
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Richen Sun as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Students in the specialized basketball class.
  • No history of sports-related injuries in the past six months.
  • No history of serious injuries or illnesses that would affect participation in this experiment.
  • Willing to participate in the experiment and have signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of surgery on the upper or lower limbs or other parts of the body within the past six months.
  • History of severe sports injuries or physical illnesses.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Unstable Resistance Training Group

    Unstable Resistance Training Intervention. The training program primarily consists of unstable resistance squats and unstable planks. Depending on the participants' fitness levels and safety considerations, the program is supplemented with auxiliary exercises and sport-specific warm-ups. During training, relevant information such as compliance, number of sets, number of repetitions, subjective effort perception, attendance, and adverse events is recorded.

    Behavioral: Unstable Resistance Training Group

  • Other
    Traditional Resistance Training Group

    Traditional resistance training. This primarily involves exercises such as squats and planks, without the use of equipment like stability balls that promote instability.

    Behavioral: Traditional Resistance Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralUnstable Resistance Training Group

    Unstable Resistance Training Intervention. The training program primarily consists of unstable resistance squats and unstable planks. Depending on the participants' fitness levels and safety considerations, the program is supplemented with auxiliary exercises and sport-specific warm-ups. During training, relevant information such as compliance, number of sets, number of repetitions, subjective effort perception, attendance, and adverse events is recorded.

  • BehavioralTraditional Resistance Training

    Traditional resistance training. This primarily involves exercises such as squats and planks, without the use of equipment like stability balls that promote instability.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in normalized Y-Balance Test composite score after 12 weeks of training

    The Y-Balance Test will be used to evaluate lower-limb dynamic balance. Reach distances in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions will be measured for both the left and right limbs. All reach distances will be normalized to limb length, and a composite score will be calculated for each limb. The primary reported value will be the change in normalized composite score from baseline to 12 weeks. Higher values represent better dynamic balance ability.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 74

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Illinois Agility Test completion time after 12 weeks of training

    The Illinois Agility Test will be used to assess change-of-direction speed and agility performance. Participants will complete the standardized Illinois Agility Test course consisting of straight-line sprinting and multiple changes of direction around cones. Completion time will be recorded in seconds using a stopwatch. Two trials will be performed, and the fastest completion time will be used for analysis. The primary reported outcome will be the change in completion time from baseline to 12 weeks. Lower completion times indicate better change-of-direction performance.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 74

  2. Change from baseline in Pro Agility Test completion time after 12 weeks of training

    The Pro Agility Test (5-10-5 shuttle run) will be used to assess multidirectional change-of-direction speed and agility. Participants will sprint 5 m to one side, change direction to sprint 10 m in the opposite direction, and then change direction again to sprint 5 m back through the starting line. Completion time will be recorded in seconds using a stopwatch. Two trials will be performed, and the fastest completion time will be used for analysis. The primary reported outcome will be the change in completion time from baseline to 12 weeks. Lower completion times indicate better change-of-direction performance.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 74

  3. Change from baseline in Nebraska Agility Test completion time after 12 weeks of training

    The Nebraska Agility Test will be used to assess multidirectional agility, change-of-direction speed, and body control. Participants will complete the standardized Nebraska Agility Test course, which includes sprinting, lateral shuffling, backward running, turning, and rapid directional changes around designated cones. Completion time will be recorded in seconds using a stopwatch. Two trials will be performed, and the fastest completion time will be used for analysis. The primary reported outcome will be the change in completion time from baseline to 12 weeks. Lower completion times indicate better agility and change-of-direction performance.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 74

  4. Change from baseline in Three-Second Zone Multi-directional Movement Test completion time after 12 weeks of training

    The Three-Second Zone Multi-directional Movement Test will be used to assess basketball-specific multidirectional movement ability, including sprinting, lateral shuffling, backward running, and rapid changes of direction. Participants will complete the standardized movement course within the basketball three-second zone. Completion time will be recorded in seconds using a stopwatch. Two trials will be performed, and the fastest completion time will be used for analysis. The primary reported outcome will be the change in completion time from baseline to 12 weeks. Lower completion times indicate better multidirectional movement and change-of-direction performance.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 74

  5. Change from baseline in T-Test completion time after 12 weeks of training

    The T-Test will be used to assess agility, multidirectional movement, and change-of-direction speed. Participants will complete the standardized T-Test course, which includes forward sprinting, lateral shuffling to both directions, and backward running. Completion time will be recorded in seconds using a stopwatch. Two trials will be performed, and the fastest completion time will be used for analysis. The primary reported outcome will be the change in completion time from baseline to 12 weeks. Lower completion times indicate better agility and change-of-direction performance.

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 74

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Guangzhou Sports University Indoor Basketball Gymnasium
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Barrera-Dominguez FJ, Carmona-Gomez A, Tornero-Quinones I, Saez-Padilla J, Sierra-Robles A, Molina-Lopez J. Influence of Dynamic Balance on Jumping-Based Asymmetries in Team Sport: A between-Sports Comparison in Basketball and Handball Athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 14;18(4):1866. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041866. PubMed 33672951 ↗
  • Asgari M, Schmidt M, Terschluse B, Sueck M, Jaitner T. Acute effects of the FIFA11+ and Football+ warm-ups on motor performance. A crossover randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284702. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37079585 ↗
  • Topcu H, Gungor AK, Yildirim Y, Sekir U, Behm DG, Aldhahi MI. Effects of rear-foot instability devices on lower-limb muscle activation during the Bulgarian split squat in male football players. Sci Rep. 2025 Dec 14;16(1):2557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-32203-7. PubMed 41392178 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Due to the need to protect the privacy of the study participants, the experimental data will not be made public; however, if necessary, please contact the author for reasonable use.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07697027
Lead sponsor
Richen Sun
Responsible party
Richen Sun (Principal Investigator, Guangzhou Sport University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Hengtong Wang, Ph.D., Professor
study director · Guangzhou sport univeristy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion