ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07695389BIOMOHSUpdated Oct 1, 2026

Efficacy of a Novel Cellular, Acellular, Matrix-like Product (CAMP) Plus Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Post-Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects.

An interventional study of Control Dressing + Standard of Care and CAMP + Standard of Care in Mohs Micrographic Surgery, Cutaneous Malignancy and Mohs Surgical Defect, sponsored by BioLab Holdings. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by BioLab Holdings · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Oct 1, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in United States+5 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial assessing the efficacy of a novel cellular, acellular, matrix-like product (CAMP) plus standard of care versus standard of care alone in the management of post-mohs micrographic surgery defects.

Read the detailed description

This study will utilize a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial design.

Subjects will be adult patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery with resulting post-excisional defects suitable for healing by secondary intention or management with a topical matrix-like product.

Subjects will be randomized to receive:

  • CAMP plus Standard of Care (SOC), or
  • Control Dressing plus SOC. Randomization will occur after confirmation of final Mohs stage and measurement of the post-excisional defect.
02

Conditions studied

  • Mohs Micrographic Surgery
  • Cutaneous Malignancy
  • Mohs Surgical Defect

Keywords

  • Mohs
  • Mohs micrographic surgery
  • Mohs surgical defect
03

In context

Lead sponsor

BioLab Holdings is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Oct 1, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The potential subject must be at least 18 years of age or older.
  • The potential subject must have undergone Mohs micrographic surgery for a cutaneous (e.g., basal cell carcinoma, or squamous cell carcinoma).
  • The potential subject must have a post-Mohs surgical defect that is suitable for treatment with a CAMP product or healing by secondary intention.
  • The surgical site has received standard Mohs excision and hemostasis with no requirement for immediate flap or graft reconstruction as determined by the treating surgeon.
  • If the surgical defect is on the lower extremity, the limb must have adequate perfusion confirmed by vascular assessment. Any of the following methods performed within 3 months of the first screening visit are acceptable:

    1. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) between 0.7 and ≤ 1.3;
    2. Toe-Brachial Index (TBI) ≥ 0.6;
    3. Transcutaneous Oxygen Measurement (TCOM) ≥ 40 mmHg;
    4. Pulse Volume Recording (PVR): biphasic.
  • If the subject has multiple Mohs defects, they must be separated by at least 2 cm. The largest defect satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designated as the target wound.
  • The potential subject must agree to attend the weekly study visits required by the protocol.
  • The potential subject must be willing and able to participate in the process.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The potential subject is known to have a of \< 6 months.
  • The potential subject's target wound is not secondary to a Mohs excision.
  • The target wound is infected or there is cellulitis in the surrounding skin.
  • The target wound:

    1. Exposes tendon, bone, or joint space, and/or
    2. Requires immediate complex flap or graft reconstruction in the judgment of the surgeon.
  • The potential subject has participated in a clinical trial involving treatment with an product within the previous 30 days.
  • The potential subject has (HbA1c) greater than 10% within 3 months of the initial screening visit.
  • The potential subject, in the opinion of the investigator, has a medical or psychological condition that may interfere with study assessments.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Dressing + Standard of Care

    Standard of care will be cleaning, debridement, ulcer moisture balance, control dressing and offloading.

    Other: Control Dressing + Standard of Care

  • Other
    CAMP + Standard of Care

    Membrane Wrap-Lite is a human amniotic membrane tissue allograft derived from human placental tissue.

    Other: CAMP + Standard of Care

Interventions

  • OtherControl Dressing + Standard of Care

    Beginning at the screening visit, participants will receive weekly treatment with standard of care (cleaning, debridement, ulcer moisture balance, and offloading) until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 6 weeks, whichever occurs first.

  • OtherCAMP + Standard of Care

    Participants will receive weekly applications of Membrane Wrap-Lite and Standard of Care until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 6 weeks, whichever occurs first.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete Wound Closure

    The percentage of target wounds achieving complete wound closure in 6 weeks.

    Time frame: 1-6 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Closure

    Time to closure for the target wound.

    Time frame: 1-6 Weeks

  2. Percentage Area Reduction

    Percentage wound area reduction from TV-1 to TV-6 measured weekly with digital photographic planimetry using imaging device and physical examination.

    Time frame: 1-6 weeks

  3. Procedure-Related Adverse Events

    The number of product- or procedure-related adverse events.

    Time frame: 1-6 Weeks

  4. Wound Volume Reduction

    Percentage wound volume reduction from TV-1 to TV-6 measured weekly with digital photographic planimetry using imaging device and physical examination.

    Time frame: 1-6 Weeks

  5. Product or Procedure Adverse Events

    The number of product- or procedure-related adverse events.

    Time frame: 1-6 Weeks

  6. Numeric Pain Scale

    Change in pain at the target wound site assessed using a numeric pain scale. 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 1-6 weeks

  7. Economic Outcomes

    Health economic outcomes, including direct and indirect cost of care.

    Time frame: 1-6 Weeks

  8. Quality of Life

    Change in quality of life, using the Wound Quality of Life Questionnaire, with items scored 0-4, where higher scores indicate worse quality of life.

    Time frame: 1- 6 Weeks

  9. Scare and Cosmetic Outcomes

    Scar and cosmetic outcomes at 12 months using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). 0 being normal and 10 being very different.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  10. Time to Complete Granulation Tissue

    Time to complete granulation tissue confirmed by independent assessment.

    Time frame: 1-6 Weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Perfusion

    Changes in local perfusion at the surgical site over the 6-week treatment period, assessed via near-infrared spectroscopy.

    Time frame: 1-6 Weeks

  2. Rate of Recurrence

    The rate of recurrence within 12 months of closure when applicable.

    Time frame: 12 Months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Southside Dermatology Mohs and Skin Surgery
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74132, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 1, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in United States
Show site
  • Southside Dermatology Mohs and Skin Surgery · Tulsa, United States
Oct 1, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026→Sep 18, 2026 (actual)
Oct 1, 2026
Eligibility
3 exclusion criteria edited
What changed in the criteria
Exclusion criteria
  • EditedThe potential subject's target wound is not secondary to a Mohs excision. -
  • Edited-. The target wound is infected or there is cellulitis in the surrounding skin.
  • EditedExposes tendon, bone, or joint space, and/or[MM6.1][RB6.2]
Oct 1, 2026
Secondary outcomes
2 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionQuality of Life: how it is measured was reworded
  • Descriptionother outcomeChange in Perfusion: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 1, 2026
Title
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy of a Novel Cellular, Acellular, Matrix-like Product (CAMP) Plus Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Post-Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects.
Oct 1, 2026
Design
Phase 4→Not applicable
Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in United States
    Show site
    • Southside Dermatology Mohs and Skin Surgery · Tulsa, United States
    Start date Jul 1, 2026→Sep 18, 2026 (now actual)
    Eligibility 3 exclusion criteria edited
    What changed in the criteria
    Exclusion criteria
    • EditedThe potential subject's target wound is not secondary to a Mohs excision. -
    • Edited-. The target wound is infected or there is cellulitis in the surrounding skin.
    • EditedExposes tendon, bone, or joint space, and/or[MM6.1][RB6.2]
    Secondary outcomes 2 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionQuality of Life: how it is measured was reworded
    • Descriptionother outcomeChange in Perfusion: how it is measured was reworded
    Design Phase 4→Not applicable
    Title A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy of a Novel Cellular, Acellular, Matrix-like Product (CAMP) Plus Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Post-Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects.
    + 4 other changes: verification date, description, conditions and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07695389
Lead sponsor
BioLab Holdings
Collaborators
SerenaGroup, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
Start date
Sep 18, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Bennett Sarver
Contact
info@serenagroups.com
1-833-865-6300
Thomas Serena, MD
principal investigator · Serena Group, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion