CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07678697Updated Jul 1, 2026

Nd:YAG Laser Combined With Injection Sclerotherapy Versus Diode Laser in the Treatment of Reticular Veins and Telangiectasias Using CLaCS Technique

An interventional study of Nd:YAG laser and Diode laser in Nd:YAG Laser, Sclerotherapy and Diode Laser, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the efficacy (in terms of vein clearance) and safety of Nd:YAG laser combined with injection sclerotherapy versus diode laser combined with injection sclerotherapy in the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias using the Cryo-Laser and Cryo-Sclerotherapy (CLaCS) technique.

Read the detailed description

Reticular veins and telangiectasias (spider veins) represent common chronic venous disorders affecting a large proportion of the adult population, particularly women.

The Cryo-Laser and Cryo-Sclerotherapy (CLaCS) technique has emerged as an innovative method combining transdermal laser therapy, injection sclerotherapy, and skin cooling. This multimodal approach enhances visualization of feeder veins using augmented reality or vein illumination systems, allowing precise targeting and improved clearance rates. Cooling reduces pain and protects the epidermis, making the procedure more tolerable and safer.

Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) is considered the cornerstone of the CLaCS technique due to its deeper penetration and selective photothermolysis of hemoglobin. It effectively targets deeper reticular veins (up to 3-4 mm depth), induces vessel wall contraction, and facilitates subsequent sclerotherapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nd:YAG Laser
  • Sclerotherapy
  • Diode Laser
  • Reticular Veins
  • Telangiectasias
  • CLaCS Technique

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18-60 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • Presence of reticular veins and/or telangiectasias (CEAP classification C1).
  • Fitzpatrick skin types II-V.
  • Patients seeking cosmetic treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • History of deep vein thrombosis.
  • Coagulation disorders.
  • Allergy to sclerosant agents.
  • Active skin infection at treatment site.
  • Previous treatment of target veins within 6 months.
  • Great saphenous vein or short saphenous vein incompetence.
  • Deep venous insufficiency or thrombosis.
  • Abnormal venous duplex findings.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A (Nd:YAG Group):

    Patients will receive Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) + injection sclerotherapy (CLaCS).

    Device: Nd:YAG laser

  • Experimental
    Group B (Diode Group)

    Patients will receive Diode laser (980 nm) + injection sclerotherapy (CLaCS).

    Drug: Diode laser

Interventions

  • DeviceNd:YAG laser

    Patients will receive Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) + injection sclerotherapy (CLaCS).

  • DrugDiode laser

    Patients will receive Diode laser (980 nm) + injection sclerotherapy (CLaCS).

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Degree of vein clearance

    Degree of vein clearance will be assessed by immediate endpoint response during laser application, defined as either instantaneous disappearance of the vein or an immediate change in vein color.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Degree of pain

    Each patient will be instructed about postoperative pain assessment with VAS. VAS (0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable").

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

  2. Degree of patient satisfaction

    Degree of patient satisfaction will be assessed on a 5-point Likert scale patient satisfaction (1, extremely dissatisfied; 2, unsatisfied; 3, neutral; 4, satisfied; 5, extremely satisfied).

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

  3. Incidence of complications

    Incidence of complications such as hyperpigmentation, burns, and matting will be recorded.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

  4. Number of treatment sessions required

    Number of treatment sessions required will be recorded.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

  5. Recurrence rate

    Recurrence rate will be recorded.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ain Shams University
    Cairo, 11591, Egypt
    • Mohamed A Hagag, MD · Contact · hagagmohamed@med.asu.edu.eg · 00201126560324
    • Ahmed G Abdellattif, MD · Principal investigator
    • Mina G Basta, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07678697
Lead sponsor
Ain Shams University
Responsible party
MohamedAhmed (Lecturer of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt., Ain Shams University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 1, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Study contacts

Mohamed A Hagag, MD
Contact
hagagmohamed@med.asu.edu.eg
00201126560324

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion