CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07659158Updated Jul 2, 2026

Virtual Group Resilient Living Program For Patients Living With Advanced Cancer

An interventional study of Virtual Group Resilient Living Program (RLP) and Survey Completion in Advanced Cancer, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-02.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, minimal risk, non-randomized, single-arm study to determine feasibility and assess effectiveness of a Virtual Group Resilient Living Program (RLP) on anxiety, stress, quality of life (QOL), coping, and fatigue among patients with advanced cancer. The group RLP is a psychosocial intervention that consists of a total of 7 weekly sessions in which the interventionalist teaches the patients techniques on stress management and building resilience (mindfulness, uplifting emotions, reframe experiences through principles of gratitude, compassion, acceptance, meaning, and forgiveness). The group setting allows for support and connection amongst the patients, providing further support and motivation to practice the principles of the program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Cancer
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • English fluency
  • Diagnosis of advanced (stage III/IV) malignancy
  • Baseline distress score ≥ 4/10. Patients can answer questions orally rather than complete worksheet, if applicable
  • Life expectancy of ≥ 6 months
  • Provide informed consent
  • Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
  • Has a reliable internet connection
  • Has the ability to utilize technology to watch online modules, \& participate in virtual sessions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • As determined through self-report, those diagnosed with a history of a psychotic episode ≤ 5 years
  • All psychological co-morbidities such as a history of untreated schizophrenia, \& bipolar disease
  • A diagnosis of severe cognitive impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Group Resilient Living Program

    Participants will receive an invitation to 7 weekly 90-minute group RLP sessions. Study participation involves attending RLP sessions, and completing brief surveys related to health, well-being, and quality of life. There will also be online modules to watch and an accompanying journal (with prompts) to keep.

    Behavioral: Virtual Group Resilient Living Program (RLP) · Other: Survey Completion

Interventions

  • BehavioralVirtual Group Resilient Living Program (RLP)

    The Resilient Living Program (RLP) is a virtual program consisting of online modules and virtual training sessions focused on techniques for managing stress and building resilience (mindful presence, uplifting emotions, and reframing experiences through principles of gratitude, compassion, acceptance, meaning, and forgiveness).

    Also known as: RLP

  • OtherSurvey Completion

    Participants will complete study-related surveys.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Enrollment Feasibility

    Enrollment feasibility will be met if 42 patients are enrolled within a year.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  2. Completion Feasibility

    Completion feasibility will be met if at least 32 of 42 patients (≥75%) enrolled in the intervention arm attend at least 4 of the 7 program sessions.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  3. Acceptability - Was it Worth it (WIWI)

    measured by the three item responses from the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire. Acceptability will be met if at least 75% of respondents answer "Yes" to at least two out of the three items

    Time frame: After week 7 session

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Anxiety - GAD-7

    Measured using the General Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD 7) scale, which is used to assess symptoms and feelings of anxiety over the past two weeks. The GAD-7 consists of 7 questions answered on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 21 where 0 indicates no anxiety, 1-4 indicates minimal anxiety, 5-9 indicates mild anxiety, 10-14 indicates moderate anxiety, and 15-21 indicates severe anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session

  2. Change in Stress - PSS

    Measured using the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), which is used to assess global perceived stress experienced by the participant over the preceding 30 days. The PSS consists of 10 questions assessing how often the participant felt or thought a certain way during the past month. Possible answers include: 0 - never; 1 - almost never; 2 - sometimes; 3 - fairly often, and 4 - very often. Possible scores range from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating a better outcome (less stress).

    Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session

  3. Change in Quality of Life (QoL) - FACT-G

    Measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), a 27-item questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cancer patients. Responses to each question are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Possible total scores range from 0-108, with higher scores indicating a better outcome/better QoL.

    Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session

  4. Change in Coping - Brief COPE

    Measured using the Brief COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced), a 28-item questionnaire used to assess the different coping styles a person uses to manage stress. Each items is answered on a scale of 1 (I haven't been doing this at all) to 4 (I've been doing this a lot). The Brief COPE consists of 14 subscales, i.e. active coping, planning, positive reframing, acceptance, humour, religion, use of emotional support, use of instrumental support, self-distraction, denial, venting, substance use, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame, with two items per sub-scale. Scores on each subscales ranges from 2 to 8 with higher scores representing most-used coping styles. There is no overall composite score for this questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session

  5. Change in Fatigue - PROMIS-Fatigue

    Assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue questionnaire, a subscale of the PROMIS-29, which is used to assess fatigue and related symptoms over the past seven days. It consists of four items rated on a scale of 1(not at all) to 5 (very much). Higher scores indicate greater experiences of fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline, after week 7 session, 30 days after week 7 session

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07659158
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Deirdre R. Pachman (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 22, 2026
Start date
Jun 19, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 2, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Trials Referral Office
Contact
mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
855-776-0015
Deirdre R. Pachman, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion