An interventional study of hydrogel plaster with dexpanthenol and Standard plaster in Skin Wounds and Abrasion, sponsored by Wooshin Labottach Co., Ltd.. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-16.
Sponsored by Wooshin Labottach Co., Ltd. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Clinical evaluation of a Dexpanthenol-medicated wound plaster on standardized superficial skin abrasions
By utilizing a standardized abrasion model (based on the Wigger-Alberti methodology), the study aims to quantify the superior clinical performance of the Plaster compared to a standard plaster (conventional dry) and dry healing (no plaster). This evidence is crucial to demonstrate that the presence of Dexpanthenol provides a significant clinical benefit in terms of healing speed and aesthetic quality of the repaired tissue.
Wooshin Labottach Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
On the wound will be applied an experimental Hydrogel plaster with Dexpanthenol
Device: hydrogel plaster with dexpanthenol
On the wound will be applied a standard plaster, with no active ingredients
Device: Standard plaster
The wound is not covered or medicated
On the wound will be applied daily an hydrogel plaster with Dexpanthenol
On the wound will be daily applicated a standard plaster on the market
Re-epithelialization Rate
Measured as the percentage of wound closure compared to baseline (T0) with standardized photography
Time frame: day 5 day 7 day 15
Kinetics of Wound Closure
Time to 50% re-epithelialization
Time frame: Day 5 day 7
Subject-Reported Pain
Pain during wear and upon plaster removal assessed via a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: day 5 day 7
Scar Quality Assessment
using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) (scoring vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, and height)
Time frame: day 5 day 7 day 15
general usability
Assessment of the plaster adherence to the perilesional skin over the treatment period using a 5-Point Adhesion Score 0 (100%) to 4 (0% fallen)
Time frame: Day 1, day 5, day 7
Number of AE
Safety outcome
Time frame: from day 1 to day 15 (all the study duration)
Plan to share: Yes — When study will be closed and published
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Wooshin Labottach Co., Ltd.