ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07635654DELILAUpdated Jun 9, 2026

Disease Extent in Stage IV Lobular Carcinoma: the Aid of Imaging and Liquid Biopsy Analyses

An interventional study of whole body diffusion weighted MRI and ctDNA in Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma, sponsored by KU Leuven. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-09.

Sponsored by KU Leuven · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Metastatic invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a distinct breast cancer subtype characterized by loss of E-cadherin and a diffuse growth pattern that makes metastases difficult to detect with standard imaging such as computed tomography (CT) or 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET)/CT. As a result, disease burden in patients with ILC is frequently underestimated, progression is identified later than clinically optimal, and many patients are excluded from clinical trials due to insufficiently measurable disease.

Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) is a radiation-free imaging technique that has demonstrated improved sensitivity for detecting metastases-including peritoneal, bone, and nodal disease-in ILC. Retrospective studies suggest that WB-DWI/MRI can identify clinically relevant progression not visible on standard imaging. However, prospective evidence in ILC is lacking. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has also shown promise as a minimally invasive biomarker for monitoring treatment response, with early molecular changes often preceding radiologic progression, but data specific to ILC remain limited.

The DELILA study is a prospective, multicenter clinical trial conducted at University Hospitals Leuven and Institut Jules Bordet. The study aims to enroll 43 patients starting first-line systemic therapy for metastatic hormone receptor positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) ILC. Participants undergo serial dual imaging-WB-DWI/MRI and standard-of-care imaging-at baseline, at 1 month, and approximately every 3 months for up to 30 months or until disease progression. At each imaging time point, blood samples are collected for ctDNA analysis and Ca15.3 tumor marker assessment. Patient-reported psychological burden related to repeated imaging and blood sampling is evaluated using validated questionnaires.

The primary objective is to assess the added value of WB-DWI/MRI in detecting disease progression that informs clinical decision-making compared to standard imaging. Secondary objectives include evaluating whether ctDNA or Ca15.3 dynamics reflect disease evolution, assessing measurability of lesions with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 and MRI-specific criteria, identifying early biomarkers of treatment response using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) changes and ctDNA kinetics, and characterizing the psychological impact of trial procedures.

This study will provide the first adequately powered prospective evidence on the clinical utility of WB-DWI/MRI and liquid biopsy monitoring in metastatic ILC. Results may support implementation of WB-DWI/MRI as a routine imaging strategy, guide imaging frequency through biomarker-informed approaches, and improve patient experience and trial eligibility for individuals living with metastatic ILC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Invasive lobular carcinoma
  • Imaging
  • WB-DWI MRI
  • Liquid biopsy
03

In context

Carcinoma, Lobular

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Lobular; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 43 is below the median of 59 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Lobular.

Browse Carcinoma, Lobular studies →

Lead sponsor

KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 373 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Voluntary written of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
  2. At least 18 years of age at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  3. from 0 to 2
  4. Patient with stage IV ILC, either de novo or after prior (curative) treatment for early ILC. Histological subtype confirmed on primary tumor or on tissue. Patients that are diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer that have a mixed ILC/IBC-NST histology of the primary tumor (mixed histology within the same primary lesion) will also be able to participate and will be analyzed in an exploratory cohort.
  5. Confirmation of hormone receptor positive (HR+)/- disease either on new or archival tissue (e.g. primary tumor)
  6. Multifocal or bilateral disease is allowed if all evaluated foci present with HR+/HER2- ILC
  7. Starting of treatment for metastatic ILC

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of a to perform WB-DWI/MRI
  2. Presence of severe claustrophobia
  3. Presence of a contraindication to use IV contrast for CT or PET/CT (e.g. allergy, severe renal failure) in case a non-contrast PET/CT cannot be performed
  4. Patients considered to have oligometastatic disease who are expected to undergo locoregional treatment
  5. Presence of other in recent medical history (\<5 years)
  6. Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of and not using an adequate, highly effective
  7. Adults who are the subject of a legal protection measure or who are unable to express their consent.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
43 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Standard-of-care Imaging + Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI

    Participants will undergo dual imaging at baseline and then every three months during first-line treatment for metastatic ILC, continuing until either 30 months of follow-up or documented disease progression. At these same timepoints, ctDNA levels and Ca15.3 will also be assessed.

    Diagnostic Test: whole body diffusion weighted MRI · Diagnostic Test: ctDNA

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testwhole body diffusion weighted MRI

    Frequency: at baseline, after 1 month and every 3 months until 30 months of follow-up or disease progression

  • Diagnostic testctDNA

    Frequency: at baseline, after 1 month and every 3 months until 30 months of follow-up or disease progression

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of cases where WB-DWI/MRI contributed solely to the decision of progression and/or treatment change assessed by questionnaires filled out by the treating oncologist at the time of progression

    Time frame: At the time of progression

Secondary outcomes

  1. ctDNA dynamics

    ctDNA levels will be assessed at baseline and every 3 months. Changes in levels will be correlated with findings on imaging.

    Time frame: At baseline, after 1 month of treatment, and every 3 months of treatment until disease progression or a maximum follow-up of 30 months (end of trial).

  2. Measurability according to RECISTv1.1 criteria

    Time frame: At baseline and every 3 months of treatment until disease progression or a maximum follow-up of 30 months (end of trial).

  3. Measurability according to MRI-specific criteria

    Measurability will be assessed on MRI by use of RECIST v1.1 criteria and RECISTv1.1 extended with MRI-specific criteria (similar to MY-RADS and MET-RADS-P).

    Time frame: At baseline and every 3 months of treatment until disease progression or a maximum follow-up of 30 months (end of trial).

  4. Disease extent on WB-DWI/MRI compared to SOC imaging

    Disease extent on whole-body DWI/MRI (WB-DWI/MRI) is analyzed and compared with standard-of-care (SOC) imaging (e.g., CT, PET/CT, bone scan) using a combination of lesion detection, segmentation, and quantitative scoring methods. First, all visible lesions are identified on WB-DWI/MRI and SOC images using predefined anatomical regions. Lesions are counted and, where feasible, segmented to estimate tumor burden (e.g., total tumor volume).

    Time frame: At baseline and every 3 months of treatment until disease progression or a maximum follow-up of 30 months (end of trial).

  5. Lesion-level ADC dynamics

    Quantitative assessment using ADC measurements will be incorporated to support treatment response evaluation. Diffusion-weighted images acquired at baseline and early follow-up are used to generate ADC maps; the lesion is segmented, and quantitative metrics (e.g., mean or percentile ADC) are extracted. The change in ADC (absolute or percentage) is then calculated, with a significant increase typically indicating response, while stable or decreased ADC suggests resistance.

    Time frame: At baseline and after 1 month of treatment

  6. Scores of psychological assessment questionnaires compared to baseline

    Anxiety related to the imaging modalities will be assessed using the STAI-6 and Likert-10 scales, including evaluation of potential stressors associated with each imaging technique. The EORTC QLQ-COMU26 questionnaire will be used to assess patients' perceptions of imaging-related communication.

    Time frame: At baseline, after 1 month of treatment, and every 3 months of treatment until disease progression or a maximum follow-up of 30 months (end of trial).

  7. Scores of psychological assessment questionnaires compared between imaging modalities

    Anxiety related to the imaging modalities will be assessed using the STAI-6 and Likert-10 scales, including evaluation of potential stressors associated with each imaging technique. The EORTC QLQ-COMU26 questionnaire will be used to assess patients' perceptions of imaging-related communication.

    Time frame: At baseline and every 3 months of treatment until disease progression or a maximum follow-up of 30 months (end of trial).

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Jun 2030, 47 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 27, 2026
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
StartEst.
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2030
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2030
Last update
Jun 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07635654
Lead sponsor
KU Leuven
Responsible party
Christine Desmedt (Prof., Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 9, 2026

Study contacts

Hans Wildiers, MD/PHD
principal investigator · UZ Leuven
Philippe Aftimos, MD
principal investigator · Jules Bordet Institute
Elia Biganzoli, PHD
principal investigator · University of Milan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion