CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07634783DELTA-EXTUpdated Jun 25, 2026

Delta Pocc During Spontaneous Breathing Trial to Predict Extubation Failure in Mechanically Ventilated Adults (DELTA-EXT)

An observational study in Mechanical Ventilation Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation Extubation Failure Critical Illness, sponsored by Sanatorio Parque, Argentina. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Argentina. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-25.

Sponsored by Sanatorio Parque, Argentina · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective observational single-center study will evaluate whether dynamic respiratory stress estimated by delta airway occlusion pressure deflection (Delta Pocc) during a standardized spontaneous breathing trial can predict extubation failure in mechanically ventilated adult intensive care unit patients.

Liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation is a critical step in ICU care. Although spontaneous breathing trials are routinely used to assess readiness for extubation, some patients may successfully complete the trial despite experiencing excessive respiratory effort and physiological stress, which may increase the risk of extubation failure.

This study will include adult ICU patients who have received invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours and are considered ready for a spontaneous breathing trial according to the treating clinical team. During the trial, respiratory, ventilatory, and hemodynamic variables will be recorded at predefined time points, including measurements of Delta Pocc as a non-invasive estimate of inspiratory effort and dynamic stress.

The primary outcome is extubation failure within 48 hours after extubation, defined as reintubation and/or the need for rescue non-invasive respiratory support due to post-extubation respiratory deterioration.

The study aims to determine whether this physiological measurement may improve risk stratification during weaning and complement conventional clinical decision-making.

Read the detailed description

Background

Liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation requires integration of clinical, hemodynamic, gas exchange, and physiological criteria. The spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is a standard component of the weaning process and is commonly used to assess readiness for extubation. However, conventional clinical parameters may not fully capture the true respiratory workload experienced by the patient during the trial.

Some patients may tolerate a spontaneous breathing trial according to standard criteria while still developing excessive inspiratory effort and elevated dynamic respiratory stress, potentially predisposing them to post-extubation respiratory failure. Identifying these patients before extubation remains a major clinical challenge.

Delta airway occlusion pressure deflection (Delta Pocc), obtained during a brief expiratory occlusion maneuver, has emerged as a non-invasive physiological surrogate for inspiratory effort and dynamic transpulmonary stress. Incorporating this measurement into routine spontaneous breathing trial assessment may improve identification of patients at increased risk of extubation failure.

Objective

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the predictive ability of Delta Pocc measured during a standardized spontaneous breathing trial to identify patients at risk of extubation failure within 48 hours.

Secondary objectives include:

To describe the temporal evolution of Delta Pocc and other respiratory physiological variables during the spontaneous breathing trial.

To compare respiratory effort and physiological measurements between patients with successful extubation and those with extubation failure.

To explore the discriminatory performance of Delta Pocc compared with conventional weaning variables.

To evaluate associations between Delta Pocc and clinically relevant outcomes including reintubation, rescue respiratory support, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and mortality.

Study Design

This is a prospective, observational, single-center physiological study conducted in the adult intensive care unit of Sanatorio Parque.

The study does not modify standard clinical management. Participation will not delay extubation decisions or replace the clinical judgment of the treating team.

Study Population

Adult ICU patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours who meet clinical criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial according to routine clinical practice will be eligible.

Inclusion Criteria Age 18 years or older Invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours Clinical indication for spontaneous breathing trial Hemodynamic and clinical stability Technical feasibility for physiological measurements Exclusion Criteria Significant hemodynamic instability Severe uncontrolled hypoxemia Major arrhythmias Agitation or patient-ventilator asynchrony preventing reliable measurements Significant air leak Technical inability to perform expiratory occlusion maneuver Limitation of life-sustaining treatment Procedures

Baseline respiratory, ventilatory, and hemodynamic variables will be recorded under current ventilatory settings.

A standardized spontaneous breathing trial will then be performed using:

Pressure support ventilation (PSV): 8 cmH2O Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP): 0 cmH2O

Measurements will be recorded at:

Baseline 15 minutes 30 minutes

Collected variables include:

Delta Pocc P0.1 Estimated inspiratory muscle pressure Negative inspiratory force Respiratory rate Rapid shallow breathing index Minute ventilation Peak airway pressure Mean airway pressure Oxygen saturation Heart rate Blood pressure Mean arterial pressure Fraction of inspired oxygen

Extubation decisions, preventive non-invasive respiratory support, rescue respiratory support, and reintubation will remain entirely at the discretion of the treating clinical team according to institutional practice.

Outcomes Primary Outcome

Extubation failure within 48 hours after extubation, defined as:

Reintubation, and/or Rescue non-invasive respiratory support due to respiratory deterioration after extubation Secondary Outcomes Spontaneous breathing trial success or failure Cause of spontaneous breathing trial failure Preventive non-invasive respiratory support Reintubation Rescue non-invasive respiratory support Duration of mechanical ventilation ICU length of stay Total hospital length of stay In-hospital mortality Statistical Considerations

The study is designed to evaluate the discriminative performance of Delta Pocc as a predictor of extubation failure.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis will be used to assess predictive performance. Repeated physiological measurements will be analyzed using appropriate repeated-measures statistical methods. Multivariable logistic regression may be performed if the number of outcome events is sufficient.

A planned sample size of approximately 110 to 120 patients is expected to provide adequate event capture for exploratory predictive modeling.

Safety

This is a minimal-risk observational study. The only study-specific physiological maneuver is a brief expiratory occlusion measurement performed within standard ventilatory monitoring conditions.

No investigational drugs or devices are involved.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Ventilation Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation Extubation Failure Critical Illness

Keywords

  • ΔPocc Spontaneous Breathing Trial Extubation Failure Weaning Respiratory Effort
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Sanatorio Parque, Argentina as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult intensive care unit patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours who are considered clinically ready for a spontaneous breathing trial as part of routine weaning assessment.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours
  • Clinical indication for spontaneous breathing trial according to the treating clinical team
  • Hemodynamic and clinical stability
  • Technical feasibility for respiratory physiological measurements, including expiratory occlusion maneuver

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant hemodynamic instability
  • Severe uncontrolled hypoxemia
  • Major cardiac arrhythmias
  • Agitation or patient-ventilator asynchrony preventing reliable measurements
  • Significant air leak interfering with respiratory measurements
  • Technical inability to perform expiratory occlusion maneuver
  • Limitation of life-sustaining treatment
  • Incomplete primary outcome follow-up
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Mechanically Ventilated Adult ICU Patients Undergoing Spontaneous Breathing Trial

    Diagnostic Test: Delta Pocc Measurement During Spontaneous Breathing Trial

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDelta Pocc Measurement During Spontaneous Breathing Trial

    Delta airway occlusion pressure deflection will be measured during a standardized spontaneous breathing trial using pressure support ventilation of 8 cmH2O and PEEP of 0 cmH2O. Delta Pocc will be obtained through a brief expiratory occlusion maneuver and analyzed as a non-invasive physiological estimate of inspiratory effort and dynamic respiratory stress. The measurement will not replace clinical judgment or modify standard extubation decisions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Extubation Failure Within 48 Hours

    Number of participants experiencing extubation failure, defined as reintubation and/or the need for rescue non-invasive respiratory support due to respiratory deterioration after extubation.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours after extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Delta Pocc During the Spontaneous Breathing Trial

    Delta airway occlusion pressure deflection (Delta Pocc) measured at baseline, 15 minutes, and 30 minutes during the spontaneous breathing trial. The change from baseline and the highest value recorded during the trial will be analyzed.

    Time frame: Baseline, 15 minutes, and 30 minutes during the spontaneous breathing trial

  2. P0.1 During the Spontaneous Breathing Trial

    Airway occlusion pressure measured 100 milliseconds after the onset of inspiration (P0.1) at baseline, 15 minutes, and 30 minutes during the spontaneous breathing trial.

    Time frame: Baseline, 15 minutes, and 30 minutes during the spontaneous breathing trial

  3. Number of Participants Requiring Reintubation

    Number of participants requiring reintubation due to post-extubation respiratory failure.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours after extubation

  4. Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Non-Invasive Respiratory Support

    Number of participants requiring rescue non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and/or high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) because of respiratory deterioration following extubation.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours after extubation

  5. Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay

    Total number of days spent in the intensive care unit from ICU admission until ICU discharge.

    Time frame: Through ICU discharge, an average of 30 days

  6. Number of Participants Who Died During Hospitalization

    Number of participants who died during the index hospitalization.

    Time frame: Through hospital discharge, an average of 60 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sanatorio Parque
    Rosario, Santa Fe Province 2000, Argentina
    • Gabriel A Musso, PT, MSc · Contact · gmusso@ugr.edu.ar · +54 9 3413068143
    • Maria C Gomez, PT, MSc · Contact · cgomez@ugr.edu.ar · +5493415462918
    • Maria C Gomez, PT, MSc · Sub investigator
    • Gabriel Appendino, PT, MSc · Sub investigator
    • Martin J Managó, PT, MSc · Sub investigator
    • Matias Basso, PT, MSc · Sub investigator
    • Axel Rubies, PT, MSc · Sub investigator
    • Emanuel Giardini, PT, MSc · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Thille AW, Gacouin A, Coudroy R, Ehrmann S, Quenot JP, Nay MA, Guitton C, Contou D, Labro G, Reignier J, Pradel G, Beduneau G, Dangers L, Saccheri C, Prat G, Lacave G, Sedillot N, Terzi N, La Combe B, Mira JP, Romen A, Azais MA, Rouze A, Devaquet J, Delbove A, Dres M, Bourenne J, Lautrette A, de Keizer J, Ragot S, Frat JP; REVA Research Network. Spontaneous-Breathing Trials with Pressure-Support Ventilation or a T-Piece. N Engl J Med. 2022 Nov 17;387(20):1843-1854. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2209041. Epub 2022 Oct 26. PubMed 36286317 ↗
  • van Oosten JP, Akoumianaki E, Jonkman AH. Monitoring respiratory muscles effort during mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2025 Feb 1;31(1):12-20. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001229. Epub 2024 Nov 14. PubMed 39560150 ↗
  • Bertoni M, Telias I, Urner M, Long M, Del Sorbo L, Fan E, Sinderby C, Beck J, Liu L, Qiu H, Wong J, Slutsky AS, Ferguson ND, Brochard LJ, Goligher EC. A novel non-invasive method to detect excessively high respiratory effort and dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2019 Nov 6;23(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2617-0. PubMed 31694692 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data are not planned to be shared because this is a single-center observational study and no formal institutional data-sharing infrastructure is currently in place. De-identified aggregate study results will be reported in scientific publications.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07634783
Lead sponsor
Sanatorio Parque, Argentina
Responsible party
Musso Gabriel Andres (Principal Investigator, Adult Intensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Parque, Argentina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 9, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2026

Study contacts

Gabriel A Musso, PT, MSc
Contact
udikcar@ugr.edu.ar
+54 9 3413068143
Maria C Gomez, PT, MSc
Contact
cgomez@ugr.edu.ar
+54 9 3415462918
Gabriel A Musso, PT, MSc
principal investigator · Sanatorio Parque

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion