CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07628842Updated Jun 5, 2026

Exploring the Effect of taVNS on the Acute Stress Responses

An interventional study of Vagal Nerve Stimulation and Sham stimulation in Healthy Adult Participants, sponsored by Daniel Keszthelyi. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-05.

Sponsored by Daniel Keszthelyi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This single-center randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on the acute stress responses.

The primary aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of taVNS in mitigating the acute stress response induced by the Maastricht Acute Stress Task (MAST) among healthy subjects, measured by cortisol levels in saliva samples.

Secondary objectives include:

  • Evaluating taVNS's potential to counteract stress-induced sympathetic activation and thereby alleviate stress-related effects, including negative affect, as measuring using the I-PANAS-SF questionnaire, and feelings of stress, pain, and unpleasantness, as measured with 0-100 Visual Analog Scales (VAS)
  • Assessing its impact on autonomic outflow parameters, using a blood pressure monitor for blood pressure, and a FitBit smartwatch for heart rate variability, and Shimmer3 GSR sensor for heart rate variability and skin conductance.
  • Evaluating the relationship between stress responses and affective symptoms and personality traits, utilizing the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Big Five Inventory (BFI).

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the taVNS or sham stimulation group, administered 30 minutes before the MAST.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Adult Participants

Keywords

  • Vagal Nerve Stimulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Daniel Keszthelyi is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy participants (defined as those without a pre-existing medical comorbidity)
  • Aged between 18-65 years
  • Ability to understand and speak the Dutch language.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical history or condition affecting the cardiovascular, respiratory, urogenital, gastrointestinal/hepatic, haematologic/immunologic, HEENT (head, ears, eyes, nose, throat), dermatological/connective tissue, musculoskeletal, metabolic/nutritional, endocrine, neurological/psychiatric systems, as well as prior major surgeries or ongoing laboratory abnormalities that could potentially limit participation or completion of the study protocol;
  • Any use of medication, especially those that may influence the autonomic nervous system or the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (e.g., beta-agonists or corticosteroids), with the exception of contraceptives and paracetamol;
  • Current or lifetime psychopathology (including PHQ-9 and GHD-7 scores > 10);
  • Substance abuse (including excessive alcohol consumption);
  • Smoking;
  • Pregnancy, lactation, or intention to become pregnant during the study period;
  • Use of devices (e.g., cochlear implants) or other reasons (e.g. wounds, permanent ear-piercing) which complicate the use of the tVNS device;
  • Participation in another clinical study in which the MAST was used;
  • Administration of investigational drugs or participation in any scientific intervention study that might interfere with this study (to be determined by the principal investigator) within 180 days preceding the commencement of the study;
  • Students and employees of Maastricht University are not precluded from participation, unless they have a direct personal, professional or hierarchical position with regards to any of the study team members or their department.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation

    Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation, for 30 minutes

    Device: Vagal Nerve Stimulation

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham stimulation

    Sham stimulation with a non-conducting electrode, for 30 minutes

    Device: Sham stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceVagal Nerve Stimulation

    Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation

  • DeviceSham stimulation

    Sham stimulation with a non-conducting electrode

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neuroendocrine stress response

    A significant reduction in the neuroendocrine stress response triggered by the MAST following taVNS or sham treatment, assessed through saliva cortisol samples, with a defined threshold of a 35% decrease.

    Time frame: Assessed during one single test day, from pre-intervention baseline to post-MAST assessment (approximately 2-3 hours)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective stress response

    Subjective stress responses to the MAST following taVNS or sham treatment, assessed using the negative affect subscale of the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short Form (I-PANAS-SF; total score range: 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater negative affect) and 0-100 Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for stress, pain, and unpleasantness (0=not at all, 100=extremely; higher scores indicate greater perceived stress, pain, or unpleasantness).

    Time frame: Assessed during one single test day, from pre-intervention baseline to post-MAST assessment (approximately 2-3 hours)

  2. Cardiovascular stress response - blood pressure

    Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses to the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) following transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) or sham stimulation, assessed in mmHg. Blood pressure was measured four times.

    Time frame: Assessed during one single test day, from pre-intervention baseline to post-MAST assessment (approximately 2-3 hours)

  3. Autonomic stress response: heart rate variability

    Changes in heart rate variability responses to the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) following transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) or sham stimulation, assessed using Fitbit and Shimmer3 GSR. Heart rate variability was measured continuously during the test day.

    Time frame: Assessed during a single test day, from pre-intervention baseline to post-MAST assessment (approximately 2-3 hours)

  4. Electrodermal stress response: skin conductance

    Changes in skin conductance responses to the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) following transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) or sham stimulation, assessed in microsiemens (µS).

    Time frame: Assessed during a single test day, from pre-intervention baseline to post-MAST assessment (approximately 2-3 hours)

  5. Anxiety symptoms

    Anxiety symptoms assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire (GAD-7; total score range: 0-21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity).

    Time frame: Assessed once during the screening visit, prior to the experimental test day

  6. Depressive symptoms

    Depressive symptoms assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; total score range: 0-27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity).

    Time frame: Assessed once during the screening visit, prior to the experimental test day

  7. Personality traits

    Personality traits assessed using the Big Five Inventory-44 (BFI-44). The BFI-44 measures five personality domains (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience). Each domain score is computed as a sum or mean of item responses on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater expression of the respective personality trait.

    Time frame: Assessed once during the screening visit, prior to the experimental test day

  8. Adverse events

    Number and severity of adverse events

    Time frame: Assessed during one single test day, from pre-intervention baseline to post-MAST assessment (approximately 2-3 hours)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maastricht University
    Maastricht, Limburg 6229ER, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 17, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07628842
Lead sponsor
Daniel Keszthelyi
Responsible party
Daniel Keszthelyi (Prof. D. Keszthelyi, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Start date
Mar 21, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 12, 2026
Completion
Mar 12, 2026
Last update
Jun 5, 2026

Study contacts

Daniel Keszthelyi, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Maastricht University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion