CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07628465DL_BP_RCTUpdated Jun 5, 2026

Differential Learning Enhances Motor Performance and Retention in Sport Science Students

An interventional study of Differential Learning and Blocked Practice in Healthy Volunteer Study, sponsored by The Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax. Completed at 1 site in Tunisia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-05.

Sponsored by The Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2025, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial compared differential learning (DL) versus blocked practice (BP) on motor performance and retention in 100 sport science students. Participants performed a table tennis topspin serve. DL involved continuous movement variations without corrective feedback; BP involved repetition with corrective feedback. Outcomes included accuracy (Euclidean distance) and movement variability (ApEn). Assessments at baseline, post-intervention (after 6 sessions over 3 weeks), and 7-day retention.

Read the detailed description

A two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial. One hundred undergraduate sport science students (age 18-25 years) were randomly assigned to differential learning (DL, n=50) or blocked practice (BP, n=50). The DL group performed a table tennis topspin serve with continuous pseudo-random variations across five movement dimensions (stance, backswing amplitude, execution speed, trunk rotation, wrist action) without corrective feedback. The BP group repeated a standardized movement pattern with trial-by-trial corrective feedback. Both groups completed six training sessions over three weeks (two sessions per week, 45 min each). Motor performance (accuracy measured as Euclidean distance from target center) was assessed at baseline, post-intervention (within 48h), and retention (7 days later). Movement variability was quantified using approximate entropy (ApEn) from kinematic data. Theoretical knowledge of motor learning was assessed as a potential moderator. Linear mixed-effects models, moderation analysis, and mediation analysis (bootstrapping) were performed. The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Volunteer Study

Keywords

  • differential learning
  • blocked practice
  • motor performance
  • retention
  • movement variability
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergraduate sport science student
  • Age 18 to 25 years
  • Physically active but non-expert in table tennis (less than 2 hours per week of structured practice in the past year)
  • Absence of self-reported musculoskeletal injury affecting upper or lower limbs
  • No known neurological or sleep disorders
  • No use of medication affecting motor or cognitive function
  • No irregular sleep schedules

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Regular table tennis competition
  • Injury preventing practice
  • Known sleep disorder
  • Inability to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Differential Learning Group

    Participants performed table tennis topspin serve with continuous variations across five movement dimensions (stance, backswing amplitude, execution speed, trunk rotation, wrist action) without corrective feedback.

    Behavioral: Differential Learning

  • Active comparator
    Blocked Practice Group

    Participants repeated a standardized movement pattern with trial-by-trial corrective feedback focusing on consistency and accuracy.

    Behavioral: Blocked Practice

Interventions

  • BehavioralDifferential Learning

    Participants performed table tennis topspin serve with continuous pseudo-random variations across five movement dimensions (stance, backswing amplitude, execution speed, trunk rotation, wrist action) without corrective feedback.

  • BehavioralBlocked Practice

    Participants repeated a standardized movement pattern with trial-by-trial corrective feedback focusing on consistency and accuracy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Motor Performance (Accuracy)

    Euclidean distance (in cm) between the ball's first landing point and the center of the target area during a table tennis topspin serve.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (after 3 weeks), and 7-day retention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Movement Variability

    Approximate entropy (ApEn) derived from kinematic time-series data recorded during each trial. Higher ApEn values indicate greater movement complexity and adaptability.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (after 3 weeks), and 7-day retention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax (ISSEP Sfax)
    Sfax, 3000, Tunisia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chmara P, Brzykcy A, Brazevic S, Jozwiak M. Habitual Physical Activity and Walking Endurance Following Inpatient Rehabilitation in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Cureus. 2026 May 29;18(5):e109862. doi: 10.7759/cureus.109862. eCollection 2026 May. PubMed 42371465 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07628465
Lead sponsor
The Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax
Responsible party
Kais Elabed (PhD, Associate Professor, The Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Start date
Jun 2, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Jun 5, 2026

Study contacts

Kais El Abed, Phd
principal investigator · University of Sfax, Tunisia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion