CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07627789Updated Jun 4, 2026

This Study Aims to Assess the Impact of 50°C Saline Irrigation on the Overall Intraoperative Blood Loss and Surgical Visualization During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Rhinosinusitis.

An interventional study of Hot saline irrigation and Room-temperature saline irrigation in Rhinosinusitis Chronic and Bleeding, sponsored by Military Institute of Aviation Medicine. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Sponsored by Military Institute of Aviation Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2023, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
59
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objectives: Intraoperative bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery for severe rhinosinusitis may significantly compromise the surgical field. Saline heated to 50°C promotes transient vessel vasodilation and mucosal edema without causing nasal mucosal necrosis. The brief thermal exposure may induce superficial protein denaturation and facilitate local hemostasis, thereby improving endoscopic visibility. This study aims to assess the impact of 50°C saline irrigation on the overall intraoperative blood loss and surgical visualization during endoscopic sinus surgery for rhinosinusitis.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial study is going to assign the patients to three groups. In the interventional hot saline group (HSI), intraoperative irrigation will be performed with heated saline at 50°C. In the room-temperature saline group (RTSI), saline at 22°C will be used; in the third one group (Control), no irrigation will be administered. Intraoperative blood loss will be recorded in milliliters and milliliters per minute of operative time, and the surgical field will be evaluated using the Boezaart scale.

HSI is hypothesized to be more effective than RTSI in minimizing intraoperative bleeding during FESS.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects approximately 5-15% of the European population and significantly reduces quality of life. While pharmacological treatment, including intranasal corticosteroids, nasal irrigation, and antibiotics, may be effective in many cases, some patients will require functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Compared with traditional surgery, FESS will provide better visualization, reduced tissue trauma, fewer complications, and shorter hospitalization. However, intraoperative bleeding will remain a major challenge, as even minor bleeding may impair endoscopic visibility and increase the risk of complications. Various methods, including controlled hypotension, vasoconstrictors, corticosteroids, and reverse Trendelenburg positioning, will be used to reduce bleeding. Heated saline irrigation may also represent a useful supportive technique.

Aim This prospective study will evaluate the effect of intraoperative hot saline irrigation (HSI) on blood loss and surgical field visibility during FESS compared with room-temperature saline irrigation (RTSI) and no irrigation.

Materials and Methods Adult patients with CRS meeting EPOS 2020 criteria and requiring FESS after unsuccessful conservative treatment will be included in this randomized, patient-blinded study. Patients with fungal disease, immunodeficiency, coagulation disorders, neoplastic or autoimmune disease, or preoperative systemic steroid use will be excluded.

Participants will be randomized into three groups: HSI (0.9% NaCl at 50°C), RTSI (0.9% NaCl at 22°C), and control (no irrigation) using coin-toss allocation. Randomization will be conducted by an independent researcher not involved in surgery or postoperative assessment. Separation of responsibilities and independent surgical scheduling will be applied to reduce the risk of selection bias.

Surgical Procedure Surgical procedures will include middle meatal antrostomy, anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy, Draf I-IIa procedure, and bilateral sphenoidectomy performed without preoperative topical decongestants. A 2.7-mm Hopkins nasal endoscope (0°, 30°, 45°, or 70°; Karl Storz) and a microdebrider will be used during all procedures.

Anesthesia General anesthesia will be administered according to a standardized protocol. Anesthesia induction will be achieved with propofol, analgesia with fentanyl or remifentanil, maintenance with sevoflurane or desflurane, neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium bromide, and reversal with atropine plus neostigmine or sugammadex, depending on individual patient requirements.

Study Procedure Nasal irrigation will be performed using 0.9% NaCl at either 22°C or 50°C at least three times during surgery at 10-minute intervals. The 50°C saline solution will be stored in a laboratory incubator, while the 22°C solution will be maintained at room temperature. Irrigation will be delivered through a metal cannula connected to a syringe and inserted into the middle nasal meatus over approximately 5 seconds.

Following each irrigation, the surgical field will be evaluated using the 6-point Boezaart scale after suctioning the irrigation fluid mixed with blood from the nasopharynx. In the control group, surgical field visibility will be assessed every 10 minutes. Total blood loss will be calculated as the difference between the irrigation volume and the total suctioned fluid volume, and mean blood loss per minute will also be recorded.

The primary outcome measure will be total intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes will include blood loss per minute of operative time and surgical field quality assessed using the Boezaart scale.

Data collection and analysis:

This is a pilot study; hence the statistical analysis will be completed at the end of the study.

Each participant will receive a unique study identification number to ensure anonymity and prevent the collection of directly identifiable personal data. Study data will be recorded in a Microsoft Excel database and will include demographic characteristics, comorbidities, current pharmacological treatment, Lund-Mackay CT score, CRS phenotype with or without nasal polyps, type of surgery (primary or revision), anesthetic infusion details, mean arterial pressure and pulse rate measured at 15-minute intervals, endoscopic surgical field assessment scores recorded every 10 minutes, intraoperative complications, use of a microdebrider, total intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, and total volume of saline irrigation used.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rhinosinusitis Chronic
  • Bleeding

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • bleeding
  • boezaart scale
  • saline irrigation
  • surgical endoscopic visibility
  • fess
03

In context

Hemorrhage

3,000 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhage; 474 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 59 is below the median of 100 across 1,985 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhage.

Browse Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Military Institute of Aviation Medicine is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic rhinosinusitis diagnosed according to the EPOS 2020 criteria;
  • Confirmed failure of conservative treatment, defined as persistence of CRS symptoms for more than 12 weeks despite optimal pharmacological therapy;
  • Age over 18 years and ability to provide informed consent;
  • Written informed consent to participate in the study;
  • Presence of inflammatory changes on sinus computed tomography scans.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of patient consent;
  • Disease limited to a single sinus;
  • Conditions associated with ciliary dyskinesia (e.g., cystic fibrosis);
  • Suspected fungal infection or fungal ball;
  • Poor adherence to medical recommendations or noncompliance with treatment;
  • Suspected neoplastic disease;
  • Suspected or confirmed autoimmune disorders, particularly granulomatosis with polyangiitis;
  • - Confirmed or clinically suspected immunodeficiency; Diagnosed coagulation disorders or preoperative hemostasis test results outside laboratory reference ranges; Preoperative systemic glucocorticosteroid therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
59 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hot Saline Irrigation

    Participants undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) will receive intraoperative irrigation with 0.9% sodium chloride solution heated to 50°C at 10-minute intervals during surgery.

    Procedure: Hot saline irrigation

  • Experimental
    Room-Temperature Saline Irrigation

    Participants undergoing FESS will receive intraoperative irrigation with 0.9% sodium chloride solution at room temperature (22°C).

    Procedure: Room-temperature saline irrigation

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Participants undergoing FESS without intraoperative saline irrigation.

Interventions

  • ProcedureHot saline irrigation

    Intraoperative irrigation of the sinonasal cavity using 0.9% NaCl heated to 50°C during FESS.

  • ProcedureRoom-temperature saline irrigation

    Intraoperative irrigation of the sinonasal cavity using 0.9% NaCl at 22°C during FESS.

    Also known as: 2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total intraoperative bleeding

    The effect of intraoperative irrigation with hot 0.9% NaCl on total intraoperative blood loss during FESS, compared with room-temperature NaCl irrigation and no irrigation, that will be measured in mililiters (ml).

    Time frame: From the beginning until the end of the surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical field visibility

    The effect of intraoperative irrigation with hot 0.9% NaCl on surgical field visibility of operative time during FESS, compared with room-temperature NaCl irrigation and no irrigation. To measure this visibility - Boezaart score (from 0-5) will be used.

    Time frame: From the beginning of the operation until the end.

  2. The effect of intraoperative irrigation with hot 0.9% NaCl surgical field visibility and blood loss per minute of operative time during FESS, compared with room-temperature NaCl irrigation and no irrigation.

    The effect of intraoperative irrigation with hot 0.9% NaCl on blood loss per minute of operative time during FESS, compared with room-temperature NaCl irrigation and no irrigation. Unit of measure: ml/min.

    Time frame: From the beginning to the end of surgery.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Military Institute of Aviation Medicine
    Warsaw, Mazovian 01-755, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Altaf J, Ashfaq AH, Riaz N, Arshad M, Ayub N, Rehman A, Maqbool S. Effect of hot saline irrigation on the operative field during endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan;282(1):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09005-0. Epub 2024 Oct 1. PubMed 39354187 ↗
  • Stangerup SE, Thomsen HK. Histological changes in the nasal mucosa after hot-water irrigation. An animal experimental study. Rhinology. 1996 Mar;34(1):14-7. PubMed 8739861 ↗
  • Nagarajah D, Kueh YC, Lazim NM, Abdullah B. The hemostatic effect of hot saline irrigation in endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 18;11(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02113-0. PubMed 36401259 ↗
  • Al-Qudah MA. The effect of intranasal irrigation with epinephrine solution on intraoperative visualization and bleeding during FESS. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;279(4):1911-1917. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06952-w. Epub 2021 Jun 27. PubMed 34175968 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data collected during the study will not be made publicly available.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07627789
Lead sponsor
Military Institute of Aviation Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025
Completion
May 28, 2026
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

Agnieszka Witkowska-Janik, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Military Institute of Aviation Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion