ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07624929EVLA+VRUpdated Jun 9, 2026

The Use of Immersive Virtual Reality as a Method of Treating Anxiety and Procedural Pain During Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) of Lower Varicose Veins Under Tumescent Anesthesia

An interventional study of VR (VR-Control) in Chronic Venous Insufficiency, CVI, sponsored by Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-09.

Sponsored by Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, single-arm, pre-post interventional study designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and impact of immersive virtual reality (VR) as an adjunct to tumescent local anesthesia during endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins / chronic venous insufficiency. All eligible and consenting participants will receive the same intervention (immersive VR during the entire EVLA procedure). There is no randomization, no control group, and no allocation to different arms. Each participant serves as their own control through before-and-after comparisons

Read the detailed description

This prospective single-arm interventional study with a pre-post design aims to assess the effect of immersive virtual reality (VR) on procedural anxiety, pain perception, cybersickness, sense of presence, usability, and overall patient satisfaction during ambulatory endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) performed under tumescent local anesthesia (TLA).

All consenting adult patients scheduled for unilateral or bilateral EVLA of the great saphenous vein (GSV), small saphenous vein (SSV), or accessory veins due to symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency (CEAP C2-C6) will be enrolled. There is no control group: every participant who provides informed consent will receive immersive VR (using a head-mounted display with relaxing/immersive nature-based content) starting 5-10 minutes before tumescent infiltration and continuing throughout the procedure (\~30-60 minutes).

Key outcome measures will be collected at multiple time points:

Baseline (pre-procedure): hemodynamic parameters, saturation, technology experience, baseline anxiety and pain (VAS / NRS), every 5 minutes during the procedure and right after the surgical procedure, cybersickness (SSQ), satisfaction and any adverse events.

Technology-Focused Objective

  • To evaluate usability and tolerability of VR technology in a real clinical setting, including:
  • comfort of use during a medical procedure
  • interaction with the device during limited mobility
  • feasibility of VR integration into procedural workflow

Follow-up (4-6 weeks): delayed pain, satisfaction, technology experience, and adverse events.

The primary endpoint is the change in procedural anxiety (VAS) from pre- to post-procedure. Secondary endpoints include change in pain (NRS) and hemodynamic profile, cybersickness severity, presence scores, usability, patient satisfaction, and safety profile of VR in this setting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Venous Insufficiency, CVI

Keywords

  • EVLA
  • VR
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • adults people scheduled to EVLA under local anesthesia and signed for VR interventiion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • exclusion of epilepsy, severe motion sickness, previous severe cybersickness
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adult patients, scheduled to EVLA procedure under local anesthesia.

    exclusion of epilepsy, severe motion sickness, previous severe cybersickness

    Device: VR (VR-Control)

Interventions

  • DeviceVR (VR-Control)

    Immersive Virtual reality

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Procedural anxiety

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 0-10 points, 0-no anxiety, 10-max anxiety level. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline (0), at the beginning of surgical procedure (1), at the end of surgical procedure (2) to the end of treatment at 8 weeks (3).

  2. Level of procedural pain

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 0-10, 0- no pain, 10-max pain ever. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline (0), at the beginning of surgical procedure (1), at the end of surgical procedure (2).

  3. Heart Rate

    Heart Rate is the number of times a heart beats in one minute (bpm). Normal heart rate is 60-100 bpm.

    Time frame: Baseline, at the beginning of surgical procedure and every 5 minutes during EVLA and in the end of surgical procedure.

  4. Cybersickness severity

    SSQ The Simulator Sickness Questionnaire is the standard tool used to measure cybersickness. Patients rate 16 symptoms on a scale from 0 to 3- no, moderate, severe. These scores are mathematically weighted and aggreagated into a total scowe ranges 0-48 points. 0-5 severity level negligible, no symptoms, the VR experience is perfectly comfortable. 5-10 severity evel minimal, mild discomfort 10-15 significant, definitive sensory mismatch, patients may experiance slight nausea or disorientation 15-20 concerning, noticeable sickness, the experiance is moderately uncomfortable more than 20- high, the VR application causes severe discomfort and requires a redesign to reduce visual motion. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. The 16 symptoms are mapped into 3 subscales: nausea or stomach awareness, occulomotor- eye strain and difficulty focusing, disorientation- dizziness, vertigo,

    Time frame: Day 1- after completing the surgical procedure.

  5. Patient satisfaction

    SUS- usability questionnaire is the system usability scale, which measures the feeling of usability of the users when using computer systems, navigate patient portals, telemedicine platforms, or self-management apps. A reliable tool that measures how easy to use, complex, or efficient a patient or user finds a digital health application. It is composed of 10 questions with a five-point Likert attitude scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree), typically ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very much"). Calculation: Scores range from 0 to 100. A score above 68 is generally considered above-average usability.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks"

  6. Systolic blood pressure

    Systolic blood pressure measures the maximum pressure of blood exerts against your artery walls when your heart beats and pumps blood out to the body. Key Ranges (in mm Hg) Normal: Below 120, Elevated: 120-129, Hypertension (High Blood Pressure): 130 or higher.

    Time frame: From enrollment, at the beginning of surgical procedure and every 5 minutes during EVLA and in the end of surgical procedure.

  7. Diastolic blood pressure

    Diastolic blood pressure is the bottom (lower) number in a blood pressure reading. It measures the minimum pressure exerted against artery walls when a heart muscle is resting and refilling with blood between beats. A standard blood pressure reading is measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). According to standard cardiovascular guidelines, blood pressure is categorized by the following diastolic ranges:Normal: Less than \\(80\\) mm Hg.Elevated: Less than \\(80\\) mm Hg (with systolic between \\(120-129\\)).Hypertension Stage 1: \\(80-89\\) mm Hg.Hypertension Stage 2: \\(90\\) mm Hg or higher.Hypertensive Crisis: Higher than \\(120\\) mm Hg.

    Time frame: From enrollment, at the beginning of surgical procedure and every 5 minutes during EVLA and in the end of surgical procedure.

  8. Oxygen saturation

    Oxygen saturation measured by Pulse Oximetry Sp02 measures the percentage of hemoglobin in red blood cells that is actively carrying oxygen. It indicates how effectively is blood transports oxygen from the lungs throughout the body.Typical Ranges \& Interpretation Normal Range: 95% to 100% for a healthy adult. Low (Hypoxemia): Values below 90% are considered low and typically require external oxygen supplementation or medical evaluation.

    Time frame: From enrollment, at the beginning of surgical procedure and every 5 minutes during EVLA and in the end of surgical procedure.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bydgoszcz Univ of Science and Technology
    Bydgoszcz, 85-796, Poland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plan to share individual participant data (IPD) to other researchers. Aggregated study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07624929
Lead sponsor
Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology
Responsible party
Katarzyna Sierakowska (University Professor, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 3, 2026
Start date
Jun 10, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 10, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 10, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion