ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07618234DEPROUpdated Oct 8, 2026

Dermocosmetic Evaluation of Propolis Ointments in Atopic-Prone Dry Skin

An interventional study of Ethanolic extract of propolis and Crude propolis in Dry Skin, Atopic Dermatitis and Xerosis Due to Atopic Dermatitis, sponsored by Manara University. Completed at 1 site in Syria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.

Sponsored by Manara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Updated Oct 8, 2026Now CompletedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if propolis ointments work to improve dry, atopic-prone skin in adults. Propolis is a natural substance made by honeybees. It will also learn about the safety of these ointments.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does propolis ointment lower dryness, scaling, and roughness better than a base ointment with no propolis? Is there a difference between crude propolis and ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP)?

Researchers will compare three ointments to see if they improve skin condition:

A propolis ointment made with 3% ethanolic extract A propolis ointment made with 5% crude propolis A base ointment with no propolis (look-alike)

Participants will:

Apply the ointment to dry skin areas twice a day for 4 weeks Visit the clinic 4 times: for screening, at the start, at week 2, and at week 4 Have their skin checked by a researcher using a standard dryness score Answer questions about skin comfort, itching, and satisfaction Have a patch test before starting to check for allergy to propolis

Read the detailed description

This exploratory dermocosmetic study is a graduation project conducted by pharmacy students at Manara University in collaboration with the Syrian Scientific Society for Medicinal Herbs (SHAMNA). It evaluates two propolis-based ointments against a vehicle control in adults with atopic-prone dry skin.

STUDENT INVESTIGATORS:

Mahmoud Bitar, Haya Farhat, Nagham Saleh - supervised by Chadi Khatib, PhD, Faculty of Pharmacy, Manara University.

RATIONALE:

Atopic-prone dry skin presents with chronic dryness, scaling, roughness, mild itching, and impaired barrier function. In Syria and similar settings, topical corticosteroids are frequently used for minor skin conditions, often through over-the-counter combination products whose steroid content is not clearly labeled. This study addresses the need for evidence-based, non-steroidal alternatives for mild xerotic and atopic-prone skin.

INTERVENTIONS:

Three ointments are prepared under GMP-like conditions with identical packaging and appearance:

  1. EEP Ointment 3%: ethanolic extract of propolis (3%), white soft paraffin (67%), liquid paraffin (20%), anhydrous lanolin (10%)
  2. Crude Propolis Ointment 5%: micronized crude propolis (5%), white soft paraffin (65%), liquid paraffin (20%), anhydrous lanolin (10%)
  3. Vehicle Ointment: white soft paraffin (70%), liquid paraffin (20%), anhydrous lanolin (10%)

Propolis is standardized by total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and HPLC fingerprinting (reference compounds: CAPE, artepillin C, galangin, pinocembrin).

DESIGN:

Randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group. Allocation ratio 1:1:1. Computer-generated block randomization.

POPULATION:

Adults aged 18-60 years with atopic-prone dry skin or mild xerotic condition. Exclusion: acute eczema, infected dermatitis, psoriasis, known propolis/honey/lanolin allergy, pregnancy, breastfeeding, recent systemic corticosteroids (2 weeks), immunosuppressants (4 weeks), biologics (3 months), topical corticosteroids (1 week), topical calcineurin inhibitors (1 week), phototherapy (2 weeks).

PROCEDURES:

  • Visit 0: Screening, 48-hour patch test (forearm or upper back), informed consent
  • Visit 1 (Week 0): Randomization, baseline clinical photography, dryness score
  • Visit 2 (Week 2): Safety and cosmetic evaluation
  • Visit 3 (Week 4): Final evaluation

OUTCOMES:

Primary: Change in clinical dryness score (5-point scale: 0=None, 1=Very mild, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe) from baseline to Week 4, assessing dryness, scaling, and roughness.

Secondary: Pruritus VAS (0-10), skin comfort (Likert 1-5), cosmetic acceptability, subject satisfaction (Likert 1-5), standardized clinical photography.

SAFETY:

Erythema, burning, stinging, edema, allergic dermatitis, irritation at each visit. Adverse events: mild (continue), moderate (monitor), severe (discontinue).

ANALYSIS:

Mixed-effects repeated measures model, Tukey post hoc, Fisher exact or Chi-square for categorical variables. Significance: p \< 0.05. Software: SPSS, GraphPad Prism.

SAMPLE SIZE: 30 participants (10 per group).

COMPLIANCE: Package weighing, patient diary, usage frequency. Poor compliance: \<80% adherence.

ETHICS: Declaration of Helsinki, GCP. Written informed consent. Approved by Biomedical Ethics Committee, Syrian Scientific Society for Medicinal Herbs (SHAMNA), approval SHAMNA-2026-027.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Skin
  • Atopic Dermatitis
  • Xerosis Due to Atopic Dermatitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • propolis
  • apitherapy
  • dermocosmetic
  • skin barrier
  • natural product
  • corticosteroid-sparing
  • atopic dermatitis
  • xerosis
  • topical ointment
  • bee product
03

In context

Dermatitis, Atopic

1,591 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic; 286 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 82 across 1,246 interventional studies indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic.

Browse Dermatitis, Atopic studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Manara University as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-60 years
  • Atopic-prone dry skin or mild xerotic skin condition
  • Mild-to-moderate skin dryness, scaling, roughness, and mild itching
  • No acute inflammatory skin disease
  • Ability to attend follow-up visits and comply with application instructions
  • Signed form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to propolis, honey, or bee products
  • Known allergy to lanolin
  • Acute eczema flare, infected dermatitis, psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, fungal infections, herpes simplex, or scabies
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Recent use of systemic (within 2 weeks)
  • Recent use of (within 4 weeks)
  • Recent use of biologics (within 3 months)
  • Recent use of topical corticosteroids (within 1 week)
  • Recent use of topical calcineurin inhibitors (within 1 week)
  • Recent phototherapy (within 2 weeks)
  • Severe systemic diseases not under control
  • Poor compliance or inability to cooperate
  • Use of other skin products during the study period
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EEP Ointment 3%

    Ointment containing 3% ethanolic extract of propolis, white soft paraffin 67%, liquid paraffin 20%, anhydrous lanolin 10%. Applied twice daily for 4 weeks.

    Other: Ethanolic extract of propolis

  • Experimental
    Crude Propolis Ointment 5%

    Ointment containing 5% micronized crude propolis, white soft paraffin 65%, liquid paraffin 20%, anhydrous lanolin 10%. Applied twice daily for 4 weeks.

    Other: Crude propolis

  • Placebo comparator
    Vehicle Ointment

    Base ointment containing white soft paraffin 70%, liquid paraffin 20%, anhydrous lanolin 10%. No propolis. Applied twice daily for 4 weeks.

    Other: Vehicle ointment

Interventions

  • OtherEthanolic extract of propolis

    3% ethanolic extract of propolis in ointment base

    Also known as: EEP, Propolis extract, Bee propolis extract

  • OtherCrude propolis

    5% micronized crude propolis in ointment base

    Also known as: Raw propolis, Natural propolis, Micronized propolis, Bee glue

  • OtherVehicle ointment

    Ointment base without propolis

    Also known as: Placebo ointment, Base ointment, Control ointment, White soft paraffin base

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Clinical Dryness Score

    Clinical assessment of skin dryness, scaling, and roughness using a 5-point scale where 0=None, 1=Very mild, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe. Lower scores indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Self-reported itching intensity on a 0-10 scale, where 0=no itching and 10=worst possible itching.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, and Week 4

Other outcomes

  1. Skin Comfort Assessment

    Self-reported assessment of skin tightness, burning, soothing sensation, and softness using a Likert scale (1=Very uncomfortable, 5=Very comfortable).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, and Week 4

  2. Cosmetic Acceptability

    Self-reported assessment of ointment spreadability, greasiness, absorption, texture, and ease of application.

    Time frame: Week 2 and Week 4

  3. Subject Satisfaction Score

    Overall satisfaction with treatment using a Likert scale (1=Very dissatisfied, 5=Very satisfied).

    Time frame: Week 4

  4. Standardized Clinical Photography

    Digital photography of affected skin areas under standardized lighting, distance, angle, and camera settings at baseline and Week 4 for visual comparison.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Manara University, Faculty of Pharmacy
    Latakia, Syria
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form will be shared with other researchers following publication of primary results. Clinical photographs will be excluded from shared datasets to protect participant privacy.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Within 6 months following publication of primary results. Data will remain available indefinitely through the institutional repository.

Access criteria: Available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and agree to data use terms. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author at chadi.khatib@gmail.com

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 8, 2026
Study completion
Jun 2026→May 24, 2026 (actual)
Oct 8, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 8, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Study completion Jun 2026→May 24, 2026 (now actual)
    + 3 other changes: verification date, design details and references

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07618234
Lead sponsor
Manara University
Responsible party
Chadi Khatib (Principal Investigator, Manara University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 1, 2026
Start date
Apr 15, 2026
Primary completion
May 24, 2026
Completion
May 24, 2026
Last update
Oct 8, 2026

Study contacts

Mahmoud Bitar, BPharm St.
study director · Manara University
Haya Farhat, BPharm St.
study director · Manara University
Nagham Saleh, BPharm St.
study director · Manara University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion