ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07615205Updated Jun 8, 2026

Strength for Caregiving

An interventional study of Tailored nutritional counselling intervention in Mental Well-being, Muscle Strengh and Dietary Habits, sponsored by Susanna Kunvik. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Primary conditionFeeding BehaviorRegistry: Psychological Well-BeingReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Psychological Well-Being — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Feeding Behavior
Why
  1. Psychological Well-Being is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Feeding Behavior.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Susanna Kunvik · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this single-arm pre-post study is to promote elderly (≥ 65 years) family caregivers' dietary habits, well-being and functional capacity through comprehensive nutritional guidance. The main goals of the project are to:

  • Improve the well-being, resilience, and functional capacity of the participating family caregivers through the comprehensive nutritional counseling implemented as part of the project.
  • Create a nutrition counseling model that promotes the well-being and coping of family caregivers and can also be utilized in well-being services counties after the project concludes.
  • Produce up-to-date and practical nutrition materials for family caregivers.

The project participants will participate in two individual nutrition counselling sessions and three group nutrition counseling sessions over a period of ten months.

Researchers will compare the results of the participants' baseline and final measurements to see if nutrition counseling is effective in improving family caregivers' well-being, resilience, and functional capacity.

Read the detailed description

Background: A large proportion of Finnish family caregivers are older adults. Serving as a family caregiver places both psychological and physical strain on the caregiver. As a result, taking care of one's own well-being may be overlooked. Previous studies have shown that up to 40% of family caregivers may be at risk of malnutrition. Inadequate nutrition weakens family caregivers' health and functional capacity, potentially threatening their ability to continue providing care. At present, there is no structured and clearly defined approach to systematically addressing the nutritional status and nutritional needs of family caregivers as part of family caregivers services. Consequently, family caregivers may not receive easily accessible, targeted, and reliable nutritional guidance or materials, even though nutrition is an important factor in maintaining health, functional capacity and the ability to continue caregiving.

Aims: The aim of the Strength for Caregiving project is to promote elderly (≥ 65 years) family caregivers' dietary habits, well-being, and functional capacity through comprehensive nutritional counseling. In addition, the project aims to develop and pilot a nutritional counseling model targeted at family caregivers. The project will also produce nutrition materials for family caregivers.

Methods: The study examines the effectiveness of a 10-month tailored nutritional counseling intervention on well-being, functional capacity, nutritional status and dietary habits among elderly caregivers living in the Satakunta region, Finland. The planned sample size is 100 participants.

The 10-month intervention includes two individual counseling sessions and three group counseling sessions. The individual sessions are conducted by a nutritionist and include a personal nutrition plan. Based on the participants' preferences, the group sessions consist of either nutrition lectures or practical cooking courses.

Study outcomes are assessed at baseline and after 10 months. Outcomes are measured using questionnaires and three-day food records. Nutritional status, weight, blood pressure and muscle strength are measured at the same time points during appointments with research nurse.

Expected outcomes: The project is expected to improve family caregivers' dietary habits, well-being, and functional capacity. The nutrition coaching model will include individual and group counseling, practical cooking courses, and materials for implementing these activities, enabling different organizations and professionals to use the model and continue providing counseling after the project has ended. The materials produced will be publicly available and widely usable after the project.

Discussion: The study will support family caregivers' ability to continue their caregiving role and help reduce nutrition-related health risks. Integrating the nutrition counseling model into family caregiver services in the well-being services county will lay the foundation for long-term change. Openly available materials may help ensure that the project's impact continues beyond the project period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mental Well-being
  • Muscle Strengh
  • Dietary Habits
  • Quality of Life
  • Nutritional Status
  • Functional Capacity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Nutrition
  • Caregiver
  • mental well-being
  • Functional capacity
  • Quality of life
  • Nutritional counseling
  • Intervention
03

In context

Feeding Behavior Reclassified

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Feeding Behavior; 178 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 77 across 700 interventional studies indexed under Feeding Behavior.

Browse Feeding Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Susanna Kunvik as lead sponsor.

Compared within Feeding Behavior, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Psychological Well-Being. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Born in 1961 or earlier (i.e. aged over 65 years)
  • Adequate Finnish language skills
  • Able to give informed written consent
  • Acting as a caregiver (with or without a formal caregiver contract) in the areas of Pori, Rauma, or Kankaanpää
  • Normal cognition (participants with an score below 24 will be assessed by the responsible physician)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious acute illness or inability to act as an informal caregiver
  • A condition, ailment, or underlying health risk that is poorly controlled and that participation in the study could exacerbate, or a terminal illness (Consultation of the doctor in charge, if necessary, in unclear cases)
  • Born in 1961 or later (i.e. aged under 65 years)
  • Substance abuse based on the AUDIT-C score (consultation of the doctor in charge)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tailored nutritional counselling intervention

    This is a single-arm pre-post study. Participants in this arm are elderly family caregivers living in the Satakunta region. All participants receive a 10-month tailored nutritional counselling intervention aimed at improving well-being, functional capacity, and dietary habits. The intervention includes two individual dietary counselling sessions conducted by a nutrition specialist and three group counselling sessions. Based on participants' preferences, the group sessions consist of either group-based nutrition lectures or practical cooking courses. The individual counselling includes a personal nutrition plan.

    Behavioral: Tailored nutritional counselling intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralTailored nutritional counselling intervention

    The intervention is a 10-month tailored nutritional counselling programme for elderly family caregivers. It includes two individual dietary counselling sessions conducted by a nutrition specialist and three group counselling sessions. The individual counselling sessions include a personal nutrition plan based on the participant's needs. According to participants' preferences, the group counselling sessions consist of either nutrition lectures or practical cooking courses. The intervention aims to improve participants' well-being, functional capacity, and dietary habits.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mental well-being measured with the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)

    Psychological well-being of participating informal caregivers will be assessed using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. The WHO-5 consists of five positively worded items measuring mood, vitality, positive affect, and general psychological well-being during the previous two weeks. Each item is scored on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 to 5, giving a total raw score range of 0-25. The raw score may be multiplied by 4 to obtain a transformed score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better psychological well-being.

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Psychological burden measured with the Zarit Burden Interview, 4-item version (ZBI-4)

    Psychological burden of participating caregivers will be assessed using the 4-item version of the Zarit Burden Interview. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater psychological burden. A score of 8 or higher indicates high caregiver burden.

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 months

  2. Physical functioning measured with the five-times sit-to-stand test and hand grip strength measured with a grip dynamometer

    Physical functioning and lower-limb muscle strength will be assessed using the five-times sit-to-stand test. Participants rise from a chair and sit down five times as quickly as possible, with arms crossed over the chest. The outcome is the time needed to complete the test, measured in seconds. A longer completion time indicates poorer lower-limb muscle strength and physical functioning. Muscle strength will also be assessed using hand grip strength measured with a grip dynamometer. The outcome is grip strength, with higher values indicating better muscle strength.

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 months

  3. Protein intake measured with a 3-day food diary

    Protein intake will be assessed using a 3-day food diary including two weekdays and one weekend day. The outcomes include total daily protein intake and protein intake relative to body weight. Protein intake will be reported as grams per day and grams per kilogram of body weight per day.

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 months.

  4. Nutritional status measured with the Mini Nutritional Assessment, long form (MNA)

    Nutritional status will be assessed using the long form of the Mini Nutritional Assessment. The MNA includes anthropometric measurements, dietary assessment, general health and functioning, and self-perceived health and nutritional status. The maximum score of the long version of the MNA is 30 points. A score of 24-30 points indicates normal nutritional status, 17-23.5 points indicates an increased risk of malnutrition, and a score below 17 points indicates malnutrition.

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 months

  5. Quality of life measured with the 15D instrument

    Quality of life will be assessed using the 15D instrument which is a self-assessment-based quality of life measure developed, validated, and widely used in Finland. The 15D includes 15 dimensions of health and functioning, each scored on five levels. The responses are combined into a single 15D index score ranging from 0 to 1, where 0 represents death and 1 represents full health. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and 10 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — It has not yet been determined whether individual participant data will be shared. The decision will depend on participant consent, ethics approval, data protection requirements, and institutional policies.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 14 months later.

Of 503 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Feeding Behavior, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 14 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 515 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 22, 2026
First posted
May 29, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 2027
Last update
Jun 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07615205
Lead sponsor
Susanna Kunvik
Collaborators
City of Pori, City of Rauma, The Martha association of South West Finland, City of Kankaapää, Satakunta Wellbeing Services County, Adult education centre of Pori, Adult education centre of Rauma, Petäjä Adult Education Centre, Satakunta Caregivers Association
Responsible party
Susanna Kunvik (Principal researcher, Satakunta University of Applied Sciences) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 29, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Study contacts

Susanna Kunvik, PhD
Contact
susanna.kunvik@samk.fi
+358447103204
Petra Rautakallio-Järvinen, MSc
Contact
petra.rautakallio-jarvinen@samk.fi
+358 50 359 7196
Susanna Kunvik
principal investigator · Satakunta University of Applied Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion