A Phase 2 interventional study of DBFC with 150g of Alpha-gal Knock Out (KO) pork and DBFC with 150g of Wild Type (WT) pork in Alpha-Gal Syndrome and Allergy, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.
Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This is a multisite, randomized, double-blind, controlled cross-over trial with detailed characterization of participants with varying clinical sub-phenotypes of Alpha-gal Syndrome (AGS) who are then evaluated by oral food challenges with alpha-gal Knock Out (KO) pork versus Wild Type (WT) pork. Each participant will serve as their own control and ingest both alpha-gal-KO and WT pork on different days, with a minimum of an 8-day washout period between oral food challenges.
The primary objective is to determine whether the odds of positive challenges among participants with suspected alpha-gal syndrome are lower with alpha-gal Knock Out (KO) pork as compared to Wild Type (WT) pork during Double Blind Food Challenge (DBFC)
1,055 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 149 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 73 across 691 interventional studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.
Browse Hypersensitivity studies →National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,446 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.
Of its 405 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 302 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.
Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Reproductive potential
Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.
Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Corticosteroids (steroids)
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Each participant will serve as their own control and undergo a DBFC to alpha-gal KO pork, followed by a minimum of a 8-day washout period, then a DBFC to WT pork.
Diagnostic Test: DBFC with 150g of Alpha-gal Knock Out (KO) pork · Diagnostic Test: DBFC with 150g of Wild Type (WT) pork
Each participant will serve as their own control and undergo a DBFC to WT pork, followed by a minimum of a 8-day washout period, then a DBFC to alpha-gal KO pork.
Diagnostic Test: DBFC with 150g of Alpha-gal Knock Out (KO) pork · Diagnostic Test: DBFC with 150g of Wild Type (WT) pork
Each participant will serve as their own control and ingest both alpha-gal-KO and WT pork on different days, with a minimum of an 8-day washout period between oral food challenges
Each participant will serve as their own control and ingest both alpha-gal-KO and WT pork on different days, with a minimum of an 8-day washout period between oral food challenges
Positive Double Blind Food Challenge (DBFC) result to 150 grams of either alpha-gal knockout (KO) pork or wild type (WT) pork.
A positive challenge will be defined as experiencing symptoms grade 2 or higher on the Consortium for Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions (scale range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a more severe reaction) within 6 hours of ingestion.
Time frame: At Visit 1 (within 2 months of screening) or Visit 2 (between 8 and 30 days of Visit 1)
Alpha-gal sub-phenotype as determined by symptoms resulting from Double Blind Food Challenge (DBFC) to wild-type (WT) pork.
Post-challenge alpha-gal sub-phenotypes as defined by reaction to their first DBFC to WT pork: anaphylaxis, cutaneous-only, or GI-only.
Time frame: At Visit 1 (within 2 months of screening) or Visit 2 (between 8 and 30 days of Visit 1)
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale - Irritable Bowel Syndrome (GSRS-IBS) scores in response to 150 grams of Knock Out (KO) or Wild Type (WT) pork at each challenge visit
Validated patient-reported outcome measures: gastrointestinal symptoms based on GSRS-IBS score (score range from 15 to 105, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome).
Time frame: At 7 days following completion of Double Blind Food Challenge (DBFC) at Visit 1 (within 2 months of screening) or Visit 2 (between 8 and 30 days of Visit 1)
Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) in response to 150 grams of Knock Out (KO) or Wild Type (WT) pork at each challenge visit.
Validated patient-reported outcome measures: urticaria symptoms based on UAS7 score (score range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome).
Time frame: At 7 days following completion of Double Blind Food Challenge (DBFC) at Visit 1 (within 2 months of screening) or Visit 2 (between 8 and 30 days of Visit 1)
Plan to share: Yes — The plan is to share data upon completion of the study in: Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort), a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts.
Time frame: On average, within 24 months after database lock for the trial.
Access criteria: Open access.
Data sharing details ↗ · www.immport.org
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) →