CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07605689Updated May 26, 2026

Pain Perception of Novel Chemo-mechanical Caries Remove Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Method in Primary Molars

An interventional study of Group A: Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal (CMCR) and Group 2 :Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in Carious Primary Molars, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 9 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-26.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare pain Perception, patient acceptability, and cavity preparation time between chemo-mechanical caries removal and Atraumatic restorative treatment Method in Primary Molars.

The main questions it aims to answer: "Does chemo-mechanical caries removal show similar results compared to Atraumatic restorative treatment Method in terms of pain perception in Primary Molars?

Read the detailed description

The principles of the caries removal have changed greatly in the last decade. The use of local anesthesia with conventional techniques "high-speed hand piece" increase the fear and anxiety of the child. Minimally invasive techniques reduce the pain and anxiety of the child by eliminating the use of local anesthesia

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) is one of the approaches based on this philosophy. It involves the manual removal of carious tissue without the use of local anesthesia or rotary instruments, followed by restoration with glass ionomer cement, an adhesive material that chemically bonds to tooth structure and releases fluoride, promoting remineralization.

Chemo mechanical caries removal (CMCR) is another minimally invasive technique that utilizes chemical agents with proteolytic action to degrade denatured collagen within carious dentin, facilitating its removal without the need for rotary instruments. This technique reduces pain, discomfort, and anxiety, making it particularly suitable for pediatric patients. Additionally, CMCR minimizes the risk of unnecessary removal of healthy tooth structure and may reduce the need for local anesthesia, thereby improving patient cooperation and the overall treatment experience.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carious Primary Molars
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Healthy children aged between 5 and 9 years.
  2. Children presenting with occlusal caries in mandibular and/or maxillary primary molars Carious lesions without any pulpal involvement.
  3. Children whose parents or guardians have provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1-Children with teeth exhibiting: pulpal exposure, mobility, spontaneous pain, swelling or fistula adjacent to the tooth, furcation involvement, ervical lesions, teeth with sealants, restorations, or enamel defects also exclude .

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal (CMCR)

    Participants in this arm will receive chemo-mechanical caries removal using REMOVE gel. The procedure includes cleaning the tooth surface with wet cotton pellets, application of REMOVE gel into the cavity, and allowing it to act for approximately 30 seconds. The softened carious tissue is then removed gently without pressure. Remaining Caries become fluorescence under light cure source, and the absence of color change indicates complete removal. Residual gel is removed using sterile wet cotton pellets. Finally, the cavity is restored with high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

    Other: Group A: Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal (CMCR)

  • Experimental
    Group B: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)

    Participants in this arm will receive atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). The procedure involves opening the cavity and removal of carious dentin using a dental excavator . The cavity is clinically evaluated using a sharp explorer, and caries removal is considered complete when the explorer does not stick to dentin or produce a tug-back sensation. The cavity is then restored with high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

    Other: Group 2 :Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Interventions

  • OtherGroup A: Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal (CMCR)

    Removal of dental caries using REMOVE gel followed by restoration with high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX)

  • OtherGroup 2 :Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

    Removal of dental caries using hand instruments followed by restoration with high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Perception Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores represent greater pain intensity. 0: No pain 1-3: mild 4-5: moderate 6-7: Severe 8-9: very severe 10: Worst Pain possible

    Time frame: immediately after caries removal

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Acceptability Assessed by Likert Scale

    Patient acceptability will be evaluated using a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates very happy and 5 indicates very unhappy. Higher scores indicate lower patient acceptability. 1. Very Happy 2. Happy 3. Neither 4. Unhappy 5. Very Unhappy

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment procedure

Other outcomes

  1. Caries removal time measured by stopwatch per minutes

    The duration of the treatment procedure will be measured in minutes from the beginning of caries removal until completion of the restorative procedure. Higher values indicate longer treatment time.

    Time frame: During the caries removal procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faulty of Dentistry Cairo University
    Cairo, 12613, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • -Abdel Sattar, R., Nasr, R., Hanafy, R. (2026). 'Pain Assessment During Chemo-Mechanical and Smart Burs Caries Removal Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in Carious Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial', Egyptian Dental Journal, 72(1), pp. 25-33. doi: 10.21608/edj.2025.417407.3615

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07605689
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Maram malik osman alabd (Principle Investigator, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 26, 2026

Study contacts

Maram Malik Osman Alabd, Bachelor of dental science
Contact
maram.alabd@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
00201279666507
Manal Ahmed Elsheikh, prof, PhD
Contact

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion