CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07602374Updated Jun 12, 2026

Efficacy of Written Versus Video Patient Education Materials for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction

An interventional study of Questionnaires and Video Health Education Materials in Breast Surgery, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-12.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial evaluating the comparative efficacy of written, video, and combined written and video patient education materials relative to no supplemental education for University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) patients presenting for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction consultation.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Assess baseline knowledge, procedural confidence, and anxiety in patients presenting for breast reconstruction consultation.
  2. Compare post-intervention outcomes between patients receiving written, video, or combined educational materials relative to no supplemental education.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

1. Examine whether the relative efficacy of each modality differs across patient subgroups defined by age, area deprivation index score, and prior health literacy.

OUTLINE:

Participants will be randomized into 1 of 4 groups:

  1. Written educational intervention
  2. Video educational intervention
  3. Combined written and video educational intervention
  4. No additional educational intervention

Outcome measures are assessed at a single timepoint following participant review of assigned materials and prior to the clinical consultation. Enrolled participants who do not review their assigned educational materials prior to the clinical consultation will be excluded from primary analysis but will be included in secondary intent-to-treat analysis

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Surgery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Health Education
03

In context

Health Education

182 studies on the registry are indexed under Health Education; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 120 across 174 interventional studies indexed under Health Education.

Browse Health Education studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 or older
  • Presenting as a new patient to the UCSF plastic surgery breast reconstruction clinic
  • Considering mastectomy, including:
  • - Therapeutic mastectomy in the setting of a breast cancer diagnosis
  • - Prophylactic mastectomy in the setting of a confirmed high-risk genetic variant
  • - Staged procedures, including delayed mastectomy with initial reduction
  • Participants who are undecided between lumpectomy and mastectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Established patients returning for follow-up, in order to minimize confounding variables of individual surgeon education style on outcome measures
  • Participants who are primarily considering lumpectomy or oncoplastic reduction at the time of their visit
  • Non-English speakers, as educational materials are currently available in English only
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Written Educational Intervention

    On the day of consultation prior to meeting with the plastic surgeon, participants will receive a 20-page illustrated brochure covering the full range of reconstructive options and be asked to complete surveys. Following the appointment, a medical chart review will be conducted.

    Other: Questionnaires · Other: Written Health Education Materials · Other: Medical Chart Review

  • Experimental
    Video Educational Intervention

    On the day of consultation prior to meeting with the plastic surgeon, participants will receive a five-module video series totaling approximately 20 minutes featuring the senior author and will be asked to complete surveys; expected to take no longer than 10 minutes to complete. Following the appointment, a medical chart review will be conducted.

    Other: Questionnaires · Other: Video Health Education Materials · Other: Medical Chart Review

  • Experimental
    Combined Educational Intervention

    On the day of consultation prior to meeting with the plastic surgeon, participants in the combined arm will receive both written and video materials and will be asked to complete surveys. Following the appointment, a medical chart review will be conducted.

    Other: Questionnaires · Other: Video Health Education Materials · Other: Written Health Education Materials · Other: Medical Chart Review

  • Other
    No Supplemental Education / Control Arm

    On the day of consultation prior to meeting with the plastic surgeon, participants will be asked to complete surveys. Following the appointment, a medical chart review will be conducted.

    Other: Questionnaires · Other: Medical Chart Review

Interventions

  • OtherQuestionnaires

    Participants will complete health related questionnaires.

    Also known as: Surveys

  • OtherVideo Health Education Materials

    Five-module video series

    Also known as: Health Education Materials

  • OtherWritten Health Education Materials

    20-page illustrated brochure

    Also known as: Health Education Materials

  • OtherMedical Chart Review

    Participants may have data collected from the medical record.

    Also known as: Chart Review

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean scores on the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), State Form

    STAI is a 20 items instrument for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety for a total of 40 items. State anxiety items include: "I am tense; I am worried" and "I feel calm; I feel secure." Trait anxiety items include: "I worry too much over something that really doesn't matter" and "I am content; I am a steady person." All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "1=Almost Never" to 4="Almost Always") with a maximum score range of 40-160 when all 40 items are administered. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety. Participants will complete STAI at baseline and during clinic visit with surgeon. Means, standard deviation, and group differences of the scores with confidence intervals will be reported.

    Time frame: 1 day, during appointment immediately prior to meeting with surgeon

  2. Mean scores on the Preparation for Decision Making (PrepDM) Scale -

    The PrepDM is a validated 10-item tool that assesses a patient's perception of how well a decision aid or intervention, such as a decision aid, educational material, or clinical consultation, helps a patient feel prepared to make a health decision and discuss it with their practitioner. It evaluates a patient's perceived readiness across several aspects of decision-making, including understanding available options, recognizing benefits and risks, clarifying personal values, and feeling confident about communicating with healthcare providers. It uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=Not at all, 5=A great deal), with higher score reflecting greater perceived preparation for decision-making. Participants will complete PrepDM at baseline and during clinic visit with surgeon. Means, standard deviation, and group differences of the scores with confidence intervals will be reported.

    Time frame: 1 day, during appointment immediately prior to meeting with surgeon

  3. Mean scores on Reconstruction-Specific Knowledge Quiz

    Reconstruction-specific knowledge quiz is a 7-item quiz. It is an author-developed instrument assessing knowledge of the reconstructive options covered in the educational materials, including implant-based reconstruction, autologous reconstruction, Goldilocks reconstruction, and the option of going flat. Participants will complete Reconstruction-Specific Knowledge Quiz at baseline and during clinic visit with surgeon. Means, standard deviation, and group differences of the scores with confidence intervals will be reported.

    Time frame: 1 day, during appointment immediately prior to meeting with surgeon

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of California, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07602374
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2026
Start date
Jun 6, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 12, 2026

Study contacts

Reta Behman, BA
Contact
Reta.Behman@ucsf.edu
877-827-3222
Merisa Piper, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion