CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07595432Updated Jun 4, 2026

The Purpose of This Clinical Study is to Evaluate Optimized Maximum Plus for Maximum Visual Acuity (MPMVA) Refractive Technique and Its Effect on Visual Performance.

An observational study in Visual Outcome, sponsored by Hoya Surgical Optics, Inc.. Recruiting at 1 site in Philippines. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Sponsored by Hoya Surgical Optics, Inc. · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, parallel groups, non-interventional, examiner masked, comparative clinical study. Patients that participated in previous Hoya studies, and patients previous implanted with Hoya non-toric monofocal IOLs (sub-study only) will be enrolled in the study. The sample size for this study is based on demonstrating the non-inferiority of the mean distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) in Group 1 (Site 1) compared with Group 2 (Site 2).

02

Conditions studied

  • Visual Outcome
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hoya Surgical Optics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes subjects who have previously undergone intraocular lens implantation in prior studies. Subjects must have clear intraocular media, good visual acuity, and be able to provide informed consent and complete study procedures.

For the exploratory sub-study, a subset of subjects with eyes from multiple prior IOL studies will be included, excluding those with oblique residual astigmatism.

Inclusion criteria

Main study:

  1. Previously implanted with intraocular lens through 2 previous IOL studies;
  2. Clear intraocular media with no clinically significant opacity, in the investigator's judgment, that would affect visual acuity;
  3. Able to provide informed consent and complete all required study procedures.

Exploratory sub-study:

1. Additional inclusion criteria: Pseudophakic eyes implanted with one of the IOLs in one eye from 3 previous IOL studies

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Main study:

  1. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) worse than 0.2 logMAR (or 20/32 Snellen)
  2. Subjects with ongoing medical conditions or treatment that might impact outcomes during the study visit as determined by the investigator.

Exploratory sub-study:

1. Additional exclusion criteria: Pseudophakic eyes with oblique residual astigmatism.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Subjects to participate in main study only

    Evaluate visual outcomes in extension cohort

    Other: Non-Interventional Study

  • Subjects to participate in exploratory sub-study only

    Evaluate visual outcomes in extension cohort

    Other: Non-Interventional Study

  • Subjects to participate in both main and sub-study

    Evaluate visual outcomes in extension cohort

    Other: Non-Interventional Study

Interventions

  • OtherNon-Interventional Study

    This clinical investigation is non-interventional and does not involve the use of any new medical device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity

    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether visual performance in eyes from Group 1 (Site 1) is non-inferior to eyes from Group 2 (Site 2) with respect to distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), using a predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.10 logMAR.

    Time frame: Up to 15 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Corrected distance visual acuity and distance-corrected near acuity

    The secondary objective of the study is to evaluate whether visual performance in eyes from Group 1 (Site 1) is non-inferior to eyes from Group 2 (Site 2) with respect to corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and distance-corrected near acuity (DCNVA), using a non-inferiority margin of 0.10 logMAR.

    Time frame: Up to 15 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Peregrine Eye Laser Institute
    Manila, Philippines
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07595432
Lead sponsor
Hoya Surgical Optics, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 19, 2026
Start date
May 13, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

Srividhya Medical Monitor
Contact
srividhya.vilupuru@hoya.com
+1-909-680-3900
Srividhya Vilupuru
study director · Hoya Surgical Optics, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion