An interventional study of lateral decubitus head-up position (LH group) and supine head-up position (SH group) in Postoperative Hypoxemia, sponsored by General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-17.
Sponsored by General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Through a multicenter, three-arm randomized controlled trial design, this study aimed to compare the effects of three positioning strategies-side-lying with elevated head position, supine with elevated head position, and standard side-lying position-on the incidence of hypoxemia during the recovery phase in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy. The goal was to provide clinicians with a simple, non-invasive, and cost-effective optimization strategy.
Painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy have become the gold standard for screening and diagnosing gastrointestinal diseases due to their high patient comfort and excellent compliance rates, with their clinical application expanding annually. This procedure is performed under intravenous general anesthesia to achieve painlessness; however, anesthetic agents exert inhibitory effects on the patient's respiratory center. Additionally, the procedural manipulation causes irritation to the airways and gastrointestinal tract, leading to a high incidence of hypoxemia during the postoperative recovery phase-the most common respiratory adverse event associated with painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Mild cases may prolong patient recovery time, while severe cases can result in serious complications such as hypoxic brain injury or cardiac arrest, directly compromising patient safety and healthcare experience.
Positioning is a critical non-pharmacological intervention factor influencing perioperative respiratory function in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Different positions alter thoracic compliance, airway patency, and diaphragmatic position, thereby affecting the patient's ventilation and oxygenation status. Currently, the standard lateral decubitus position is routinely used for painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy, and it has been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of hypoxemia. However, this position presents challenges such as difficulties in patient monitoring and localized pressure-related discomfort. In contrast, the supine head-up and lateral decubitus head-up positions, by elevating the head and adjusting the body angle, effectively mitigate tongue base prolapse and improve thoracic expansion, theoretically reducing the risk of hypoxemia. Nevertheless, there is currently a lack of multicenter, large-sample, prospective randomized controlled studies to compare the efficacy and safety of these three positions in preventing hypoxemia in recovery rooms for painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy patients. Consequently, there is no unified evidence-based guideline for selecting the optimal clinical positioning.
Based on this, this study focuses on three clinically common positions and employs a multicenter, three-arm, randomized controlled parallel design to systematically investigate the effects of lateral supine with head elevated, supine with head elevated, and standard lateral position on postoperative hypoxemia in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy. The aim is to fill a research gap in this field and provide high-quality evidence-based medical data to optimize postoperative position management during recovery and reduce adverse respiratory events following painless gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Special Note：Prespecified subgroup analyses will be conducted based on age (\<65 vs ≥65), sex, BMI, ASA class, smoking and alcohol use, Mallampati score, anesthetic agent (clobupol or propofol), type of endoscopy (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, or gastroenteroscopy), Ramsay sedation score (2-4), pre-procedure hypoxemia, prior pulmonary surgery, OSA, respiratory disease, and intra-procedural hypoxemia (SpO₂ ≤90% for >10 seconds). The influence of heterogeneity on the primary outcome will also be evaluated.
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University is the lead sponsor of 102 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Withdrawal Criteria:
The patient maintains the predetermined lateral position with the head of the bed elevated at 30 degrees.
Procedure: supine head-up position (SH group) · Procedure: standard lateral decubitus position group (SL group)
The patient was transferred from a pre-existing lateral decubitus position to a supine position without a headrest, with the head of the bed elevated at 30 degrees.
Procedure: lateral decubitus head-up position (LH group) · Procedure: standard lateral decubitus position group (SL group)
Patients should maintain their original left lateral position with the head of the bed elevated at 0 degrees.
Procedure: lateral decubitus head-up position (LH group) · Procedure: supine head-up position (SH group)
An angle measuring device is placed beside the head of the examination bed to facilitate precise adjustment of the head position. Upon admission to the recovery room, the patient's Ramsay Sedation Scale score is assessed by an independent investigator (the attending anesthesiologist): 1 = agitated; 2 = fully awake, calm and cooperative; 3 = drowsy but responsive to verbal commands; 4 = drowsy but responsive to touch or pain; 5 = asleep but slow to respond to touch or pain; 6 = deep sleep with no response. Patients scoring 2-4 are immediately randomized into the study group, while those below this range are randomized after achieving the required score. Prior to enrollment, all patients remain in the left lateral position (bed head elevated 0°, consistent with the examination position). Patients assigned to the lateral supine head-elevated group (LH group) maintain their pre-assigned lateral position with the head elevated 30°.
An angle measuring device is placed beside the head of the examination bed to facilitate precise adjustment of the head position. Upon admission to the recovery room, the patient's Ramsay Sedation Scale score is assessed by an independent investigator (the attending anesthesiologist): 1 = agitated; 2 = fully awake, calm and cooperative; 3 = drowsy but responsive to verbal commands; 4 = drowsy but responsive to tactile or pain stimuli; 5 = asleep but slow to tactile or pain responses; 6 = deep sleep with no response. Patients scoring 2-4 are immediately randomized into the study group, while those below this range are randomized after achieving the required score. All patients are initially positioned in the left lateral decubitus position (head elevated at 0°, the same as during examination). Patients assigned to the supine head-elevated group (SH group) are transitioned from the lateral position to supine without a headrest, with the head elevated at 30°.
An angle measuring device was placed beside the head of the examination bed to facilitate precise adjustment of the head position. Upon admission to the recovery room, the patient's Ramsay Sedation Scale was assessed by an independent investigator (the attending anesthesiologist): 1 = agitated; 2 = fully awake, calm and cooperative; 3 = drowsy but responsive to verbal commands; 4 = drowsy but responsive to touch or pain; 5 = asleep but slow to respond to touch or pain; 6 = deep sleep with no response. Patients scoring 2-4 were immediately randomized into the study group, while those below this range were randomized after achieving the required score. All patients were initially positioned in the left lateral decubitus position (head elevated at 0°, the same as during examination). Patients in the Standard Lateral Position Group (SL group) maintained their original left lateral position with the head elevated at 0°.
Incidence of recovery-phase hypoxemia
Proportion of participants experiencing hypoxemia (SpO₂ ≤ 90% lasting \>10 seconds) during the post-procedure recovery period
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Incidence of Subclinical Respiratory Depression during Recovery
Proportion of participants experiencing subclinical respiratory depression, defined as any episode of pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂) in the range of 90% to \<95% (inclusive of 90%, exclusive of 95%) during the post-procedure recovery period
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Overall Incidence of Airway Intervention During Recovery
Proportion of participants requiring any grade of airway intervention (increase oxygen flow, chin lift, mask ventilation, or reintubation) during recovery.
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Cough Severity Grade During Recovery
Severity of cough assessed during the recovery period, graded as: Grade I: No cough, smooth breathing; Grade II: Single mild cough; Grade III: Multiple coughs lasting \<15 seconds; Grade IV: Continuous coughing lasting ≥15 seconds. Reported as the proportion of participants reaching each grade (I-IV).
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Length of Stay in Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Time from admission to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) until discharge criteria are met (modified Aldrete score ≥9 on three consecutive assessments), recorded in minutes.
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Respiratory Comfort Score During Recovery
Patient-reported respiratory comfort assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (worst discomfort) to 10 (greatest comfort)
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
PACU Nurse Satisfaction Score
Nurse-assessed satisfaction with patient respiratory stability and overall recovery management, rated using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (lowest satisfaction) to 10 (highest satisfaction), recorded at patient discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Incidence of Tachycardia During Recovery
Proportion of participants experiencing tachycardia (heart rate \>100 beats/min) during the post-procedure recovery period.
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Incidence of Bradycardia During Recovery
Proportion of participants experiencing bradycardia (heart rate \<50 beats/min) during recovery.
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Incidence of Hypotension During Recovery
Proportion of participants experiencing hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<80 mmHg) during recovery.
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Incidence of Nausea or Vomiting During Recovery
Proportion of participants experiencing nausea (subjective complaint) or vomiting (objective expulsion of gastric contents) during recovery.
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Incidence of Laryngospasm During Recovery
Proportion of participants experiencing laryngospasm (acute upper airway obstruction with stridor/inability to ventilate, resolving with intervention) during recovery.
Time frame: From PACU admission until discharge, assessed up to 30 minutes
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University