CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07582913Updated May 15, 2026

Manual Versus Autoflow Ventilation During Anesthesia Inductıon in Geriatric Patients

An interventional study of Manual Mask Ventilation and AutoFlow Mechanical Mask Ventilation in Cerebral Oxygenation, Peripheral Oxygenation and Geriatrics, sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-15.

Sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
106
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to compare the effects of manual ventilation and AutoFlow ventilation, administered during the induction of general anesthesia, on cerebral (s-rSO₂) and peripheral (somatic) oxygenation (p-rSO₂) in geriatric patients.

Read the detailed description

Ventilation strategies applied during the induction of general anesthesia have a significant impact on cerebral and peripheral oxygenation in geriatric patients. During the induction phase, respiratory and hemodynamic changes become more pronounced due to age-related physiological alterations such as diminished cardiopulmonary reserve, increased chest wall rigidity, decreased pulmonary elasticity, and impaired cerebral autoregulation. These changes increase the vulnerability of elderly patients to hypoxemia, hypocapnia, and imbalances in oxygen delivery. In particular, even brief episodes of hypoxemia or hypocapnia during induction may adversely affect cerebral oxygenation in this population.

Manual mask ventilation may result in unintentional hyperventilation or hypoventilation, potentially leading to hypocapnia and subsequent disturbances in cerebral oxygenation. In contrast, AutoFlow ventilation provides controlled ventilation with predefined parameters and may ensure more stable oxygen delivery.

This study is designed as a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of manual ventilation and AutoFlow ventilation applied during the induction of general anesthesia on cerebral regional oxygen saturation (s-rSO₂) and peripheral (somatic) regional oxygen saturation (p-rSO₂) in geriatric patients. The primary hypothesis is that AutoFlow ventilation provides more stable cerebral and peripheral oxygenation compared to manual ventilation during the induction period.

The study will be conducted in the General and Oncology Operating Rooms of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital. Patients aged 65 years and older, of both sexes, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, and scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia will be included. A total of 106 patients (53 per group) will be enrolled based on power analysis, accounting for a potential 10% data loss.

Upon arrival in the operating room following standard preoperative fasting, demographic data (age, sex, height, weight, body mass index) and clinical characteristics (comorbidities, ASA classification) will be recorded. Standard ASA monitoring, including electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry, will be applied. Cerebral and peripheral oxygenation will be continuously monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with sensors placed bilaterally on the frontal region and on the volar surface of the forearms. Baseline values will be recorded before preoxygenation (T1).

Preoxygenation will be performed using 100% oxygen with a flow rate of 10 L/min until end-tidal oxygen (ETO₂) reaches 85% and plateaus for at least 30 seconds. Measurements at this stage will be recorded as T2.

Anesthesia induction will be standardized using fentanyl (1 µg/kg), lidocaine (1 mg/kg), propofol (2-3 mg/kg), and rocuronium (0.6-1 mg/kg), while maintaining hemodynamic stability within ±20% of baseline values. Following induction, mask ventilation with 100% oxygen will be applied for 2 minutes.

Patients will be randomly assigned using a computer-based block randomization method into two groups: manual ventilation and AutoFlow ventilation. In the manual ventilation group, ventilation will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist or anesthesia resident using a reservoir bag. In the AutoFlow group, ventilation will be delivered by the anesthesia machine using predefined settings: tidal volume of 6 mL/kg (ideal body weight), respiratory rate of 12 breaths per minute, peak pressure limit of 30 cmH₂O, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O.

At the end of the 2-minute ventilation period before laryngoscopy, measurements will be recorded as T3 (post-induction, pre-intubation), including heart rate, mean arterial pressure, s-rSO₂, p-rSO₂, end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂), and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). After endotracheal intubation and confirmation of tube placement, mechanical ventilation will be initiated and final measurements will be recorded as T4 (post-intubation).

To ensure standardization, NIRS device settings, including alarm limits, noise-reduction filters, and averaging time (8 seconds), will be kept constant for all patients. Factors that may affect measurements, such as motion artifacts, extremity temperature, arrhythmias, or vasopressor use, will be recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Oxygenation
  • Peripheral Oxygenation
  • Geriatrics
  • Ventilation
  • Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Keywords

  • Geriatrics
  • Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
  • Cerebral Oximetry
  • Cerebral Autoregulation
  • Mask Ventilation
  • Autoflow
03

In context

Respiratory Aspiration

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Aspiration; 215 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 106 is above the median of 43 across 882 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Aspiration.

Browse Respiratory Aspiration studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent is the lead sponsor of 424 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 65 years and older.
  • Patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia.
  • Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I, II, or III.
  • Volunteer patients who are willing to participate and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe heart failure or severe pulmonary disease.
  • Patients with a presence or history of brain tumors or cerebrovascular accidents (CVA/stroke).
  • Patients with impaired cooperation or cognitive dysfunction (e.g., dementia, delirium, Alzheimer's disease).
  • Patients with a known history or preoperative prediction of a difficult airway.
  • Patients with a known allergy to the monitoring sensor materials.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
106 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group M (Manual Ventilation)

    Following the standardized induction of general anesthesia (1 µg/kg fentanyl, 1 mg/kg lidocaine, 2-3 mg/kg propofol, and 0.6-1 mg/kg rocuronium), mask ventilation with 100% oxygen will be manually performed by an experienced anesthesiologist or anesthesia resident. Manual ventilation using a reservoir bag will be maintained for 2 minutes to allow for adequate muscle relaxation prior to intubation.

    Procedure: Manual Mask Ventilation

  • Experimental
    Group A (AutoFlow Ventilation)

    Following the same standardized general anesthesia induction protocol, mask ventilation with 100% oxygen will be mechanically delivered by the anesthesia workstation for 2 minutes. The device will be set to deliver a tidal volume (VT) of 6 mL/kg based on the patient's ideal body weight, a respiratory rate of 12 breaths/minute, a peak inspiratory pressure limit of 30 cmH₂O, and a Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O.

    Procedure: AutoFlow Mechanical Mask Ventilation

Interventions

  • ProcedureManual Mask Ventilation

    Patients will receive manual mask ventilation with 100% oxygen using a reservoir bag. This procedure will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist or anesthesia resident for 2 minutes following the administration of induction agents, allowing for adequate muscle relaxation prior to endotracheal intubation.

  • ProcedureAutoFlow Mechanical Mask Ventilation

    Patients will receive mask ventilation delivered mechanically by the anesthesia workstation. The device will provide 100% oxygen for 2 minutes following the administration of induction agents. The ventilator settings will be standardized to an AutoFlow mode with a tidal volume (VT) of 6 mL/kg (based on ideal body weight), a respiratory rate of 12 breaths/minute, a peak pressure limit of 30 cmH₂O, and a Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Cerebral Regional Oxygen Saturation (s-rSO2)

    Bilateral cerebral regional oxygen saturation will be continuously measured using a Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) device (INVOS™ oximeter) with sensors placed on the right and left frontal regions. The changes in s-rSO2 values will be recorded to evaluate the impact of manual versus AutoFlow mask ventilation during the induction of general anesthesia.

    Time frame: Baseline prior to pre-oxygenation (T1), immediately after pre-oxygenation (T2), post-induction/pre-intubation following 2 minutes of mask ventilation (T3), and immediately post-intubation (T4).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Peripheral (Somatic) Regional Oxygen Saturation (p-rSO2)

    Bilateral peripheral regional oxygen saturation will be measured using NIRS sensors placed on the volar surfaces of the right and left forearms to evaluate tissue oxygen delivery and peripheral perfusion.

    Time frame: Baseline prior to pre-oxygenation (T1), immediately after pre-oxygenation (T2), post-induction/pre-intubation following 2 minutes of mask ventilation (T3), and immediately post-intubation (T4).

  2. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)

    Hemodynamic stability will be evaluated by recording Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) using standard non-invasive monitor. Measurements will be tracked to ensure parameters remain within a ±20% margin of the baseline during induction.

    Time frame: Baseline prior to pre-oxygenation (T1), immediately after pre-oxygenation (T2), post-induction/pre-intubation following 2 minutes of mask ventilation (T3), and immediately post-intubation (T4).

  3. Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)

    Standard systemic oxygen saturation will be monitored non-invasively via pulse oximetry.

    Time frame: Baseline prior to pre-oxygenation (T1), immediately after pre-oxygenation (T2), post-induction/pre-intubation following 2 minutes of mask ventilation (T3), and immediately post-intubation (T4).

  4. End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (EtCO2)

    The efficacy of the mask ventilation techniques will be evaluated by recording End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (EtCO2).

    Time frame: Post-induction/pre-intubation following 2 minutes of mask ventilation (T3), and immediately post-intubation (T4).

  5. Heart Rate

    Hemodynamic stability will be evaluated by recording Heart Rate (HR) using standard non-invasive monitor.

    Time frame: Baseline prior to pre-oxygenation (T1), immediately after pre-oxygenation (T2), post-induction/pre-intubation following 2 minutes of mask ventilation (T3), and immediately post-intubation (T4).

  6. Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP)

    The efficacy of the mask ventilation techniques will be evaluated by recording Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP).

    Time frame: Post-induction/pre-intubation following 2 minutes of mask ventilation (T3), and immediately post-intubation (T4).

  7. Tidal Volume (VT)

    The efficacy of the mask ventilation techniques will be evaluated by recording delivered Tidal Volume (VT).

    Time frame: Post-induction/pre-intubation following 2 minutes of mask ventilation (T3), and immediately post-intubation (T4).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
    Ankara, Çankaya 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Burkhart CS, Rossi A, Dell-Kuster S, Gamberini M, Mockli A, Siegemund M, Czosnyka M, Strebel SP, Steiner LA. Effect of age on intraoperative cerebrovascular autoregulation and near-infrared spectroscopy-derived cerebral oxygenation. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Nov;107(5):742-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer252. Epub 2011 Aug 10. PubMed 21835838 ↗
  • Ishiyama T, Kotoda M, Asano N, Ikemoto K, Shintani N, Matsuoka T, Matsukawa T. Effects of hyperventilation on cerebral oxygen saturation estimated using near-infrared spectroscopy: A randomised comparison between propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;33(12):929-935. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000507. PubMed 27802250 ↗
  • Groene P, Rapp M, Ninke T, Conzen P, Hofmann-Kiefer K. Impact of mild hypo- and hyperventilation on cerebral oxygen supply during general anesthesia. Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Mar 17;14(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00517-9. PubMed 40091065 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07582913
Lead sponsor
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Responsible party
Fatma GÜLGÜN KILIÇASLAN (Resident, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 13, 2026
Start date
May 13, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 5, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 15, 2026

Study contacts

FATMA G KILIÇASLAN, Resident
Contact
fatmagulgunkilicaslan@gmail.com
+905305692877
EYÜP HORASANLI, Professor
study director · Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion