CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07576322POLTX_FiberUpdated May 8, 2026

Short-Term Safety and Performance of Two Wound Dressings Evaluation

An interventional study of Politix Fiber arm in Chronic Wound Care, Local Infection and Safety, sponsored by Sebastian Probst. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-08.

Sponsored by Sebastian Probst · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic wounds, including venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and pressure ulcers, are defined as wounds that fail to heal within 4-8 weeks despite appropriate care. They represent a significant health burden due to prolonged healing, risk of infection, recurrence, and impact on quality of life and healthcare costs. Their development is multifactorial and often linked to vascular impairments, which reduce oxygen and nutrient supply. This leads to impaired tissue repair, persistent inflammation, and increased susceptibility to infection.

Standard treatment includes wound debridement, infection control, maintaining a moist environment, and managing pain and exudate. POLTX_Fiber is an absorbent gelling fiber dressing designed to improve moisture balance, manage exudate, and reduce bacterial load, with established safety and CE marking.

A post-market clinical follow-up study will compare POLTX_Fiber with Suprasorb® Liquacel Pro over a 30-day period in an outpatient setting. The study evaluates wound healing, infection status, usability, pain, and patient satisfaction. It is conducted in accordance with EU and Swiss regulations, ensures qualified investigators, and considers sex and gender differences in the analysis.

Read the detailed description

Chronic wounds, including venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and pressure ulcers, represent a growing healthcare burden, associated with delayed healing, high recurrence rates, and reduced quality of life. Their pathophysiology is multifactorial, involving impaired perfusion, dysregulated inflammation, and bacterial colonization, all of which contribute to prolonged healing.

Effective wound management requires control of exudate, maintenance of a moist wound environment, and management of microbial burden. Absorbent gelling fiber dressings are commonly used for this purpose; however, comparative clinical evidence between available products remains limited.

POLTX_Fiber is a CE-marked absorbent gelling fiber dressing intended to support exudate management and wound healing. Additional clinical data are needed to further evaluate its performance under routine clinical conditions, in line with post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) requirements under Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of POLTX_Fiber in patients with chronic wounds in an outpatient setting, compared with a standard gelling fiber dressing. The primary objective is to assess changes in wound surface area over a 30-day treatment period. Secondary objectives include evaluation of wound condition, patient outcomes, and device usability.

This is a multicenter, non-randomized, controlled, open-label PMCF study conducted in outpatient care. Eligible patients will receive either POLTX_Fiber or a comparator dressing as part of routine clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Wound Care
  • Local Infection
  • Safety

Keywords

  • chronic wound
  • local infection prevention
  • wound exudate
  • safety
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sebastian Probst is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age ≥ 18 years Chronic wound of 4 weeks to 2 years in duration Moderate to highly exuding wound (clinician-assessed) Wound area 2-50 cm² after debridement Able and willing to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Known hypersensitivity to study or comparator dressing components Clinically infected wound requiring systemic antibiotics at baseline Necrotic wound (>25% necrotic tissue) or malignant wound Severe arterial insufficiency (ABI \< 0.5) Pregnant or breastfeeding Severe comorbid condition likely to interfere with wound healing or safety evaluation (e.g., end-stage renal disease, active cancer on chemotherapy, immunosuppression) Participation in another interventional study within 30 days Use of investigational wound products within 30 days Cognitive or psychiatric condition limiting consent or compliance Unable to attend follow-up visits or likely to relocate during the study period Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, may compromise safety or study integrity

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    POLTX_Fiber arm

    POLTX\_Fiber, an absorbent gelling fiber dressing for moderate-high exudate chronic wounds

    Combination Product: Politix Fiber arm

  • No intervention
    Suprasorb® Liquacel Pro, CE-marked gelling fiber dressing

    Suprasorb® Liquacel Pro arm

Interventions

  • Combination productPolitix Fiber arm

    POLTX\_Fiber, an absorbent gelling fiber dressing for moderate-high exudate chronic wounds, applied strictly per IFU and local protocol. Application workflow (per visit). It will proceed as follows: * Removal of old dressing. * Application of analgesic if necessary (timed to peak during debridement/dressing). * Debridement if necessary (sharp/hydrolytic per local practice; document method/date). * Wound cleansing (sterile 0.9% saline or Ringer's; no antiseptics) (IWII 2025). * Application of a suitable secondary dressing according to wound phase and medical prescription to secure the primary and maintain moisture balance. * Compression therapy for venous disease according to the standardized procedure described in Section 6.1; apply off-loading for DFU per local SOP where indicated. * Documentation in the eCRF (Imito Wound® digital photographs/planimetry, tissue composition, exudate character, TILI infection score, VAS pain, any device deficiencies).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Photographic evaluation

    Standardized photographs will be obtained using ImitoWound® after dressing removal, wound debridement (if applicable) and wound cleansing at a frequency of no more than once per week, even if multiple dressing changes take place during the same week. ImitoWound® will be used in an iPad as instructed in supplier's wound imaging and measurement guidelines. The camera of the iPad will be maintained 20 to 30 cm away from and parallel to the wound. A calibration marker (quick response \[QR\] code) will be positioned next to and in the same plane of the wound, and a photograph will be taken after recognition of the QR code by ImitoWound®, providing automatic wound measurements. This marker will allow standardised image captures maintaining fixed distance, lighting, and calibration. Study nurses will receive concise training and a working instruction with step-by-step procedure on how to use ImitoWound®. Images will be anonymized and centrally reviewed by two blinded assessors; discrepancies \>

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  2. Change in wound area

    Wound area (length, width, depth, area) will be recorded using ImitoWound®. Percent wound area reduction (PWAR) from baseline to EoT (Day 30) or follow-up (Week 8 and Week 12) will be computed automatically using the following formula: PWAR = \[(Wound area at baseline - Wound area at follow-up) / Wound area at baseline\] × 100. Higher percentages indicate faster healing. Where digital imaging is unavailable, manual planimetry measurements may be used and documented.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wound healing progression

    Wound healing progression over 12 weeks will be measured from pictures of the wound taken with ImitoWound

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Change in wound tissue composition

    Change from baseline in wound tissue composition, as assessed using digital wound assessment technology. Tissue composition (e.g. granulation, slough, necrosis) will be determined automatically through ImitoWound® image analysis at baseline and when wound images are captured during wound care. Results will be expressed as a percentage of total wound area (sum = 100%), enabling consistent quantification of healing dynamics over time.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Local Infection Assessment

    Local infection will be evaluated at each visit using the Therapeutic Index for Local Infection (TILI), a validated clinical tool for early infection detection (erythema, peri-wound oedema, malodour, exudate change, pain). A TILI score ≥ 5 indicates clinically relevant infection requiring medical evaluation or treatment adjustment.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Global Tolerability Assessment

    Usability of POLTX\_Fiber will be assessed using a short Investigator Usability and Handling Questionnaire based on ISO 14155:2020 and FDA Human Factors guidance (2016). Parameters include ease of application/removal, dressing integrity, handling characteristics, and overall satisfaction. Rated on a 5-point Likert scale (Total score ranges from 5 to 22).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Pain (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Pain will be recorded at each dressing change using a 10-cm VAS (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable). Pain on application, during wear, and on removal will be documented.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Exudate management

    Assessment of characteristics of wound exudate In addition to color and odor of wound exudate will be recorded using simplified Keast (2022) descriptors: * Color: serous (clear/amber), serosanguinous (pink), purulent (opaque/yellow/green). * Odor: absent, faint, moderate, strong. Abrupt increases in volume or the emergence of purulent/strongly malodorous exudate will trigger reassessment of the TILI Score and clinical review to rule out infection.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Frequency of dressing changes

    The total number of dressing changes (scheduled and unscheduled) during the thirty-day treatment will be recorded in the eCRF. Each entry will include: * Date and time of change * Reason (e.g., exudate saturation, leakage, odor, clinical judgement) * Dressing type (POLTX\_Fiber vs SoC) * Cumulative dressing count Participants will be categorized as ≤2 changes/week, 3-4 changes/week, or ≥5 changes/week. Lower dressing-change frequency indicates better absorbency and longer wear time.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Global Tolerability Assessment by participants

    Patients will independently assess tolerability on a 3-point scale (Chandanwale 2014): 0 = No issues, 1 = Moderate, 2 = Poor.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Sociodemographic and diagnostic data

    At Screening, investigators will collect the following information and record it in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF): * Sociodemographic data (age, sex, occupation, level of mobility, living situation). * Relevant comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, venous insufficiency). * Current medications or topical wound treatments. * Lifestyle factors (smoking and alcohol use).

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Wound etiology

    At Baseline, wound etiology (e.g., venous leg ulcer, diabetic foot ulcer, pressure ulcer) will be documented

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Wound anatonical location

    Wound anatomical location will be documented at baseline

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Wound diagnostic classification

    Wound diagnostic classification (if applicable, e.g., Wagner grade for diabetic ulcers or EPUAP stage for pressure ulcers).

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Geneva University Hospitals
    Geneva, Canton of Geneva 1205, Switzerland
  • Lausanne University Hospital
    Lausanne, Canton of Vaud 1002, Switzerland
  • Instituions Hospital Du Nord Vaudois
    Yverdon-les-Bains, Canton of Vaud 1400, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Raw data will be shared using Yareta (https://yareta.unige.ch/home) a Swiss research platform using the FAIR priniples

Supporting information: Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07576322
Lead sponsor
Sebastian Probst
Collaborators
eHnv Hospital, University Hospital, Geneva, CHUV, Lausanne University Hospitals, Switzerland
Responsible party
Sebastian Probst (Professor of Tissue Viability and Wound Care, School of Health Sciences Geneva) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 8, 2026
Start date
Jun 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 14, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 8, 2026

Study contacts

Sebastian Probst, Prof. Dr.
Contact
sebastian.probst@hesge.ch
41 22-558-6563
André Frei, MSc
Contact
andre.frei@hesge.ch
41 22-558-6050

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Other studies from this sponsor

Sebastian Probst

Start the discussion