CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07566143SCT-OLDUpdated Jul 14, 2026

Social Cognitive Theory-Based Education for Improving Health Outcomes in Older Adults

An interventional study of Social Cognitive Theory-Based Education in Health Behavior, Health Literacy and Self Efficacy, sponsored by Muhammet Faruk Yigit. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-14.

Sponsored by Muhammet Faruk Yigit · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a Social Cognitive Theory-based education program on self-efficacy, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and health literacy in older adults aged 65 years and over attending primary care centers. Participants will be assigned to either an intervention group receiving a structured education program or a control group receiving routine care. The intervention consists of three face-to-face educational sessions delivered weekly. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 4-6 weeks after the intervention using validated scales. The findings are expected to contribute to improving health behaviors and health literacy among older adults in primary care settings.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a Social Cognitive Theory-based educational intervention on self-efficacy, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and health literacy among older adults. The study will be conducted in a primary care setting and will include individuals aged 65 years and older who meet the inclusion criteria and provide informed consent.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group will receive a structured education program based on Social Cognitive Theory, delivered in three weekly face-to-face sessions, each lasting approximately 30 minutes. The content of the program includes health promotion, healthy nutrition, physical activity, chronic disease management, self-efficacy enhancement, and health literacy improvement. The control group will receive routine primary care services without additional intervention.

Data will be collected at two time points: baseline (pre-test) and 4-6 weeks after the completion of the intervention (post-test). Outcome measures include self-efficacy, assessed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale; healthy lifestyle behaviors, assessed using the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile; and health literacy, assessed using the Health Literacy Scale (short form).

The study is expected to provide evidence on the effectiveness of theory-based educational interventions in promoting health behaviors and improving health literacy among older adults in primary care settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Health Behavior
  • Health Literacy
  • Self Efficacy
  • Aging

Keywords

  • Social Cognitive Theory
  • Health Education
  • Older Adults
  • Primary Care
  • Healthy Lifestyle
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
03

In context

Health Behavior

228 studies on the registry are indexed under Health Behavior; 95 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is below the median of 114 across 196 interventional studies indexed under Health Behavior.

Browse Health Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Muhammet Faruk Yigit is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 65 years and older
  • Able to communicate in Turkish
  • Willing to participate and provide informed consent
  • Having sufficient cognitive ability to follow the education program

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Severe psychiatric disorder
  • Acute or life-threatening medical condition
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    Participants in this group will receive a structured Social Cognitive Theory-based education program consisting of three weekly face-to-face sessions, in addition to routine primary care services.

    Behavioral: Social Cognitive Theory-Based Education

  • No intervention
    Arm Type: Control Group (No Intervention)

    Participants in this group will receive routine primary care services without any additional educational intervention.

Interventions

  • BehavioralSocial Cognitive Theory-Based Education

    A structured face-to-face education program based on Social Cognitive Theory, delivered in three weekly sessions covering health promotion, nutrition, physical activity, self-efficacy, and health literacy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-Efficacy Level

    Self-efficacy will be assessed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). The scale consists of 10 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale (1-4), with a total score ranging from 10 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy (better outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline and 4-6 weeks after intervention

  2. Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors

    Healthy lifestyle behaviors will be measured using the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II). The scale includes 52 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1-4), with total scores ranging from 52 to 208. Higher scores indicate more positive health-promoting lifestyle behaviors (better outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline and 4-6 weeks after intervention

  3. Health Literacy Level

    Health literacy will be assessed using the Health Literacy Scale-Short Form (HLS-SF). The scale consists of items rated on a Likert-type scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate higher health literacy levels (better outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline and 4-6 weeks after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tuşba Bardakçı Family Health Center
    Van, Van 65100, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: 25 years on. Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4):daaf119. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf119. No abstract available. PubMed 40665800 ↗
  • Sorensen K, Pelikan JM, Rothlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, Fullam J, Kondilis B, Agrafiotis D, Uiters E, Falcon M, Mensing M, Tchamov K, van den Broucke S, Brand H; HLS-EU Consortium. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv043. Epub 2015 Apr 5. PubMed 25843827 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07566143
Lead sponsor
Muhammet Faruk Yigit
Responsible party
Muhammet Faruk Yigit (Principal Investigator, Yuzuncu Yil University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 4, 2026
Start date
May 20, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2026
Completion
Jul 10, 2026
Last update
Jul 14, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion