CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07565987APRILUpdated Sep 24, 2026

The APRIL Trial Evaluating Upfront Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Stage III Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

An interventional study of SBRT in stage III NSCLC in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to test the feasibility \& loco-regional control rate by combining high precision SBRT with chemotherapy in stage III NSCLC in tumor/lymph nodes if tumors/lymph node size with ≤ 6cms in size.

Read the detailed description

The standard of care for unresectable stage III NSCLC lung cancer is combination chemoradiotherapy and best results are achieved when radiation is given along with concurrent chemotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is associated an overall survival rate at 5 years between 15%-32%.

Local relapse in stage III NSCLC can vary from 20% to 50%. Conventional radiation therapy results in high local failure rates that theoretically could act as a nidus for metastasis. For NSCLC, there is a proposed dose effect on local control and survival with doses of at least 70 Gy and tumors with volumes >100 cc require higher doses for better local control. However, in a prospective randomized controlled trial setting, CRT dose escalation with conventional radiotherapy was associated with inferior local control, PFS, OS and higher toxicity.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers high dose conformal radiation through multiple radiation beams with steep dose gradients in 3-8 fractions and has shown limited toxicity despite delivering a high dose BED10>100 in early NSCLC. Local control in early-stage NSCLC with SBRT is around 85-90% . One landmark paper demonstrated significant survival benefits for stage I lung cancer with SBRT doses of biological equivalent (BED)10 in excess of 100 Gy. SBRT with BED10>100 Gy has convincingly achieved excellent treatment out comes in early-stage NSCLC. Similar local control may be achieved SBRT in stage III NSCLC provided safe dose of BED10>100 Gy is delivered. This holds true when tumor diameter is ≤ 6 cms.

SBRT has been combined with conventional CRT in stage III NSCLC with intent to decrease local failure. A recently conducted systematic review of SBRT in inoperable stage III NSCLC has published SBRT outcomes .In this systematic review, 6 studies considered SBRT administration in stage III NSCLC, 1 employed SBRT in monotherapy and 5 employed SBRT as dose escalation after conventional chemoradiotherapy. Median dose of conventional radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and median dose of SBRT boost was 22.25 Gy in 2 to 7 fractions. SBRT was used to treat primary tumor and involved lymph nodes in 3 out of 5 studies. The systematic review concluded that dose-escalation with 2 fraction SBRT (20-24 Gy) was feasible and was associated with local control rate of 78% at 1 year with 3.7% grade 5 and 14.2% grade 3toxicity.

There is data emerging on use of SBRT as monotherapy in stage III NSCLC. Ultra-central tumors in a study were treated with SBRT to primary and lymph nodes to a dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Despite large tumors (median tumor diameter was 6.8 cm [range: 2.1-12.4 cms] and ultra-central location median local control was 17 months for stage III patients. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 9.8% of patients. Another phase II trials examined the feasibility of SBRT is locally advanced NSCLC. The prescribed doses were 30 Gy/5daily fractions at the reference isodose (60-70%) to the tumor, and 25 Gy/5 daily fractions to the clinically involved lymph nodes. Median follow-up was 87 months (range: 6-87), local PFS was 19.8 months (95% CI 9.7 - not reached), OS was 23 months. Late toxicity was represented by 24% dyspnea G3.

Hilar/mediastinal SBRT is a safe technique for isolated nodal disease . A retrospective study that treated 40 patients of NSCLC with SBRT for primary/oligorecurrent hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes. The median dose of SBRT was 48 Gy in 4 fractions. The aortico-pulmonary window was the target in 40%, hilum in 25%, lower paratracheal in 20%, subcarinal in 10%, and prevascular in 5%. Acute grade 3+ morbidity was seen in 3 patients (hemoptysis, pericardial/pleural effusion, heart failure) and late grade 3+ morbidity (hemoptysis) in 1 patient. A systematic review of SBRT on mediastinal \& hilar lymph nodes that included 196 patients has been recently conducted. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common primary (65%) tumor subjected to mediastinal \& hilar node SBRT. The reported dose and fractionation ranged from 21 Gy to 60 Gy in 3-11 fractions, with median BED ranged from 46-106 Gy. SBRT was associated with excellent local control (LC) rates of 69%-97% \& 1 year OS of 69%-75%. Pooled grade 3-5 toxicity rate according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 was 6% (n=11). Pooled SABR-related mortality (grade 5 toxicity) rate was 2% (n=4). Three SABR-related deaths from esophageal fistulae (2 to trachea, 1 to mediastinum) were reported, with all 3 having prior RT to the subcarinal nodes Given the safety \& excellent efficacy of SBRT for small tumors (≤ 6cms) as well as hilar \& mediastinal lymph nodes, the present phase study is designed evaluate SBRT in stage III NSCLC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 18 or above and less than 75 years.
  2. Histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer.
  3. Stage T1-4, N1-3, M0 with maximum tumor size less than 6 cms and ≤ 3 stations of largest lymph node size less than 4 cms.
  4. ECOG status 0-1.
  5. Available to attend long term follow- up.
  6. Written informed consent for treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Metastatic disease.
  2. Tumor size > 6cm.
  3. Involved Lymph node size greater than 4 cms \& more than 3 station of lymph nodes involved.
  4. Patients with superior vena cava obstruction.
  5. Tumor invading/encasing the proximal bronchial tree/, esophagus, pericardium.
  6. Previous radiotherapy to thorax.
  7. Small cell histology.
  8. Age\< 18 or > 75 years.
  9. Patients on anticoagulant therapy \& ultra-central cavitary tumors.
  10. Poor performance status ECOG 2-3.
  11. Immunocompromised states.
  12. Viral Markers negative.
  13. Pregnant women
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SBRT in stage III NSCLC

    The study will evaluate efficacy \& toxicity of SBRT in stage III NSCLC

    Radiation: SBRT in stage III NSCLC

Interventions

  • RadiationSBRT in stage III NSCLC

    SBRT to primary tumor and lymph nodes in stage III NSCLC when gross disease is \< 6 cms

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Loco-regional control rate

    Loco regional control rate assessment till 2 years

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disease free survival

    Longitudinal assessment every 2 months for initial six months and every 3 months till next 2 years

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Overall survival

    Longitudinal assessment every 2 months for initial six months and every 3 months till next 2 years

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. CTCAE V5 Toxicity

    CTCAE Grades Grade refers to the severity of the adverse event. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL\*. Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL\*\*. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE. Assessed at base line, post SBRT, post Chemotherapy, first follow up, at 6 months and then 6 monthly

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. EORTC QLQ C30 Quality of life

    The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. High score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. Assessed at base line, post SBRT, post Chemotherapy, first follow up, at 6 months and then 6 monthly

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. EORTC LC-13 Quality of life

    The lung cancer module incorporates one multi-item scale to assess dyspnoea, and a series of single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and haemoptysis. It has scoring system from 1 to 4, higher score represents higher symptom burden. Assessed at base line, post SBRT, post Chemotherapy, first follow up, at 6 months and then 6 monthly

    Time frame: 2 years

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Nci, Aiims-Jhajjar
    Jhajjar, Haryana 124105, India
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07565987
Lead sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Aman Sharma (Associate professor, Radiation oncology, NCI, AIIMS, Jhajjar and Principle investigator, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2026
Start date
Dec 19, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 18, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 18, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Aman Sharma, MD
Contact
amans757@gmail.com
+91117018529339

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion