CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07561203COLLMOTIONUpdated May 13, 2026

Effect of Collavant® n2 in Healthy Male Adults With Exercise-induced Joint Discomfort.

An interventional study of Native type II collagen (Collavant® n2) and Placebo in Healthy Adult Male, sponsored by Bioiberica. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to male participants aged 40 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-13.

Sponsored by Bioiberica · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The present clinical study has been designed to evaluate the effect of Collavant® n2 at a daily dose of 40 mg on joint function and performance in healthy, amateur male runners with exercise-induced knee discomfort.

Read the detailed description

The COLLMOTION study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel clinical study designed to evaluate the effects of Collavant® n2 on joint function, performance and discomfort in healthy, physically active male adults experiencing exercise-induced knee discomfort.

A total of 80 healthy male amateur runners aged 40 to 65 years are enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Collavant® n2 (40 mg/day) or placebo for a total intervention period of 24 weeks. Eligible participants are required to train regularly (≥150 minutes per week), report persistent exercise-related knee discomfort, and meet predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure the absence of diagnosed knee pathology such as osteoarthritis.

The primary objective of the study is to assess differences from baseline and versus placebo in joint discomfort. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of joint function, physical performance, perceived exertion, pain intensity before exercise, time to pain recovery, and joint inflammation.

Safety and tolerability are evaluated throughout the study via monitoring of adverse events, vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory parameters, and quality-of-life assessments. Participants undergo assessments at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Adult Male

Keywords

  • Native type II collagen
  • Undenatured type II collagen
  • Collavant® n2
  • Joint discomfort
  • Knee discomfort
  • Joint function
  • Cartilage biomarkers
  • Healthy active adults
  • Amateur runners
  • Knee function
  • Exercise-induced joint discomfort
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Bioiberica is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy physically active male adults (amateur runners) with exercise-induced joint discomfort, aged between 40 and 65 years
  • Activity level: Amateur runners who train regularly a minimum of 150 minutes per week, divided into 2 or more sessions per week during at least 3 months. Principally, subjects training for popular running events of 10 Kms.
  • Joint discomfort after activity: Self-reports target knee discomfort after training by a score of at least 20 mm VAS at screening. Discomfort persistent for at least 2w.
  • Be willing to refrain from starting any new dietary supplements during the entire study that have any underlying joint benefits (collagen, glucosamine, chondroitin, MSM, Hyaluronic Acid, Turmeric, Natural Eggshell Membrane, Omega-3 fatty acids, PEA, Boswellia,..). If any of these supplements (except collagen) or any other dietary supplement has been taken consistently for at least 6 months prior to enrollment, participants should maintain the same stable intake pattern throughout the 24 week study period.
  • Have individual devices to monitor training with GPS
  • Sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnostic of knee osteoarthritis or any pathology or surgical intervention associated with the knee.
  • Hypersensitivity to any component of the supplement or the placebo
  • Chronic treatment with analgesic or anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs and corticosteroids families) drugs
  • Treatment with any type of collagen supplement
  • Treatment with probiotics or antibiotics
  • Inability to train for the next 24 weeks
  • Follow a vegan diet
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Collavant® n2

    Native type II collagen (Collavant® n2)

    Dietary Supplement: Native type II collagen (Collavant® n2)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementNative type II collagen (Collavant® n2)

    Native type II collagen (Collavant® n2). 1 capsule 40 mg / day

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo. 1 capsule / day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Exercise-Induced Knee Joint Discomfort

    Joint discomfort will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to quantify knee pain intensity associated with physical activity. The primary endpoint is the change in knee joint discomfort from baseline, comparing Collavant® n2 versus placebo. VAS scores will be collected under standardized conditions after the running test, to capture exercise-induced discomfort.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in joint pain intensity after physical activity

    Knee pain intensity following the running test will be measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12

  2. Change in joint pain intensity before physical activity

    Knee pain intensity will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) prior to performing the standardized running test.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12, baseline (week 0) to week 24

  3. Time to recovery of knee pain after exercise

    The time required for knee pain to return to the participant's pre-exercise baseline level following the running test will be recorded by participant self-report.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12, baseline (week 0) to week 24

  4. Change in physical performance during the running test

    Physical performance will be assessed by recording completion time (in seconds) for a standardized running test.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12, baseline (week 0) to week 24

  5. Change in perceived exertion during physical activity

    Perceived exertion will be assessed using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale immediately after the running test.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12, baseline (week 0) to week 24

  6. Change in knee joint function

    Knee function will be evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), a validated questionnaire assessing pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport/recreation function, and knee-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12, baseline (week 0) to week 24

  7. Change in knee joint inflammation

    Thermal response of the knee joint will be evaluated using infrared thermography before exercise, immediately after exercise, and 30 minutes post-exercise to assess exercise-induced inflammatory response.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12, baseline (week 0) to week 24

  8. Change in cartilage biomarkers

    Blood and urine biomarkers related to cartilage turnover and inflammation will be measured.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12, baseline (week 0) to week 24

Other outcomes

  1. Change in clinical knee examination

    Clinical assessment of patellofemoral pain using the Zohlen test will be performed before and after the running test.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12, baseline (week 0) to week 24

  2. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Number and percentage of participants experiencing adverse events classified by severity and relationship to the study intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24

  3. Changes in Vital Signs

    Change from baseline in vital signs: systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) and heart rate (beats per minute).

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24

  4. Changes in clinical laboratory parameters

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameters: hematology and blood biochemistry values.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24

  5. Changes in physical activity level

    Change from baseline in participant-reported physical activity level assessed using IPAQ questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24

  6. Change in dietary habits

    Change from baseline in participant-reported dietary intake assessed using the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24

  7. Change in Quality of Life score

    Change from baseline in quality of life score assessed using the Quality of Life questionnaire SF-12

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24

  8. Change in muscle strength assessed by handgrip dinamometry

    Change from baseline in muscle strength (in Kg or Newtons) assessed by handgrip dynamometry.

    Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24]

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
    Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
    • Marcela Gonzalez-Gross, Professor · Contact · marcela.gonzalez.gross@upm.es · (+34) 910677962
    • Javier Modrego-Martin, Doctor · Contact · javier.modrego@upm.es · (+34) 910677962
    • Marcela González-Gross, Professor · Principal investigator
    • Javier Modrego-Martin, Doctor · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07561203
Lead sponsor
Bioiberica
Collaborators
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2026
Start date
May 6, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 13, 2026

Study contacts

Mónica García-López, Doctor
Contact
monicagarcia@bioiberica.com
+34 93 765 03 90
Marcela González-Gross, Professor
principal investigator · Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
Javier Modrego-Martin, Doctor
principal investigator · Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion