An observational study in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-01.
Sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano · Observational
Left atrial (LA) size and function are powerful prognostic markers in a variety of clinical conditions. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the gold-standard to assess the volumes of heart chambers by contouring cavity borders at end-diastole and end-systole from a short-axis cine stack. This method is routinely used to measure ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, but has never been implemented for LA volume measurements, due to the need of a significant lengthening of both CMR acquisition and post-processing times. Current CMR guidelines do not provide any specific recommendation on LA imaging in daily routine, and LA volume is usually evaluated by using the biplane area-length algorithm in standard cine long-axis images. Yet, the latter methodology implies geometric assumptions about the LA shape that are often not fulfilled in routine patients. Moreover, the standard long-axis views are oriented according to the major axis of the left ventricle (LV), which lies in a plane with a different spatial orientation compared with the LA. As a result, standard long-axis views optimized according to the maximal LV length commonly foreshorten the LA and therefore underestimate its size.
Accordingly, a previous echocardiographic study showed that long-axis views focused on the LA were more accurate to derive LA maximal volume vs. standard long-axis views.
Differently from echocardiography, CMR allows to orientate images during acquisition process with no dependency from acoustic windows. Capturing the true LA long-axis by focused imaging is therefore more feasible with CMR vs. two-dimensional echocardiography. Compared to current CMR practice, implementation of focused LA long-axis views might result in improved accuracy of LA volumes estimation with no significant delay on acquisition times (Figure).
LA dysfunction, as assessed by deformation analysis, is emerging as an early prognostic marker in several cardiac diseases. At present, standard long-axis cine images are used for CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT), which allows the assessment of atrial phasic functions. Of core importance, CMR-FT derived strain parameters [i.e., LA total strain (εs), conduit strain (εe), and booster strain (εa)] are sensible to plan orientation and might be affected by foreshortening.
Current CMR protocols use long-axis cine images oriented on the LV long axis and may systematically underestimate LA size and function. We hypothesize that LA-focused long-axis cine images at CMR are more accurate in estimating LA volumes and function than current practice.
Istituto Auxologico Italiano is the lead sponsor of 196 studies on the registry; 78 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients who undergo clinically indicated CMR
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who undergo clinically indicated CMR
Diagnostic Test: CMR scan
CMR image acquisition and analysis of the left atrium
Left atrial volume - focused long-axis views
Left atrial volume obtained by focused long-axis imaging
Time frame: Baseline
Left atrial volume - standard long axis views
Left atrial volume obtained by standard long-axis imaging
Time frame: Baseline
Duration of acquisition of focused long-axis views of left atrium
Duration of acquisition of focused long-axis views of left atrium in minutes
Time frame: Baseline
Longitudinal strain - focused long-axis views
CMR Feature Tracking (CMR-FT) strain obtained by focused long-axis imaging
Time frame: Baseline
Longitudinal strain - standard long-axis views
CMR Feature Tracking (CMR-FT) strain obtained by standard long-axis imaging
Time frame: Baseline
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Istituto Auxologico Italiano