ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07556601Updated Jun 30, 2026

Ultra-rapid Blastocyst Vitrification: Pilot Randomized Study

An interventional study of Standard Vitrification and Ultra-Rapid Vitrification in Infertility, sponsored by Fundacion Dexeus. Recruiting at 2 sites in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-30.

Sponsored by Fundacion Dexeus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Blastocyst vitrification is standard in assisted reproduction, but clinical data on ultra-rapid vitrification are limited. This pilot study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and preliminary clinical performance of an ultra-rapid blastocyst vitrification protocol compared with the standard approach.

Read the detailed description

Blastocyst cryopreservation by vitrification is currently the standard approach in assisted reproductive technology, providing high post-warming survival rates and clinical outcomes comparable to those of fresh embryo transfer. Ongoing refinements of vitrification techniques aim to further improve laboratory efficiency and workflow while maintaining biological safety and clinical effectiveness.

Ultra-rapid vitrification protocols have been developed to shorten equilibration times by modifying exposure kinetics to cryoprotectants, while preserving the fundamental biophysical principles of vitrification. Although ultra-rapid warming protocols are well established, clinical data specifically evaluating ultra-rapid vitrification of blastocysts remain limited.

Moreover, ultra-rapid vitrification requires mechanical collapse of the blastocyst before cooling, introducing an additional embryological manipulation with potential biological implications that warrant careful clinical validation. In this context, the present pilot study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary clinical performance of ultra-rapid blastocyst vitrification compared with the standard vitrification protocol, prior to broader clinical implementation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility

Browse trials for

03

In context

Infertility

2,085 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 357 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 135 across 1,412 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundacion Dexeus is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Recipients of donor oocytes
  • Blastocysts suitable for cryopreservation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cycles involving PGT
  • Cycles not reaching blastocyst stage.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Vitrification Protocol

    The standard vitrification protocol corresponds to the routine clinical practice of the laboratory and consists of the following steps: 1. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 10-12 minutes at room temperature. 2. Vitrification solution exposure: Blastocysts are then transferred to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum exposure time of 90 seconds. 3. Loading: The blastocyst is loaded onto a Cryotop device (Kitazato). 4. Vitrification: The Cryotop is plunged directly into liquid nitrogen within 1 second of loading to ensure ultra-rapid cooling. 5. Capping: The Cryotop is immediately capped under liquid nitrogen conditions.

    Other: Standard Vitrification

  • Experimental
    Ultra-Rapid Vitrification Protocol

    The ultra-rapid vitrification protocol is identical to the standard protocol in terms of media, devices, and laboratory conditions, with the following modifications: Preparation step - Blastocyst shrinkage: Prior to equilibration, artificial collapse of the blastocyst is performed using a single laser pulse to induce blastocoel shrinkage. The subsequent steps are: 1\. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 2-4 minutes. Vitrification solution exposure: Transfer to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum of 90 seconds. 3\. Loading: Loading of the blastocyst onto a Cryotop device. 4. Vitrification: Immediate plunging of the Cryotop into liquid nitrogen within 1 second. 5\. Capping: Immediate capping under liquid nitrogen.

    Other: Ultra-Rapid Vitrification

Interventions

  • OtherStandard Vitrification

    1. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 10-12 minutes at room temperature. 2. Vitrification solution exposure: Blastocysts are then transferred to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum exposure time of 90 seconds. 3. Loading: The blastocyst is loaded onto a Cryotop device (Kitazato). 4. Vitrification: The Cryotop is plunged directly into liquid nitrogen within 1 second of loading to ensure ultra-rapid cooling. 5. Capping: The Cryotop is immediately capped under liquid nitrogen conditions.

  • OtherUltra-Rapid Vitrification

    The ultra-rapid vitrification protocol is identical to the standard protocol in terms of media, devices, and laboratory conditions, with the following modifications: Preparation step - Blastocyst shrinkage: Prior to equilibration, artificial collapse of the blastocyst is performed using a single laser pulse to induce blastocoel shrinkage. The subsequent steps are: 1. Equilibration step: Blastocysts are equilibrated in Equilibration Solution (ES) for 2-4 minutes. 2. Vitrification solution exposure: Transfer to Vitrification Solution (VS) for a maximum of 90 seconds. 3. Loading: Loading of the blastocyst onto a Cryotop device. 4. Vitrification: Immediate plunging of the Cryotop into liquid nitrogen within 1 second. 5. Capping: Immediate capping under liquid nitrogen.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-warming survival rate

    the proportion of vitrified blastocysts that remain morphologically viable after warming, expressed as a percentage of all warmed blastocysts.

    Time frame: Immediately after warming (within the same laboratory session)

  2. Clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (only first transfer will be considered).

    defined as the proportion of embryo transfers resulting in a clinical pregnancy, confirmed by the presence of an intrauterine gestational sac on ultrasound. Only the first embryo transfer per patient is included in the analysis.

    Time frame: 6-8 weeks after embryo transfer

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blastocyst re-expansion

    defined as the resumption of blastocoel expansion after warming, as assessed by partial or complete reformation of the blastocyst cavity, indicating post-warming viability

    Time frame: Within 2 hours after warming

  2. Post-warming blastocyst morphokinetic parameters

    Assessment of post-warming embryo developmental dynamics based on time-lapse observation. Morphokinetic parameters will include time to blastocoel re-expansion and time to resumption of blastocyst development, measured in hours from warming to embryo transfer.

    Time frame: From embryo warming until embryo transfer (within 2-6 hours post-warming)

  3. Post-warming blastocyst morphological quality

    Evaluation of blastocyst morphological quality after warming and prior to embryo transfer. Blastocysts will be graded according to standard morphological criteria based on blastocoel expansion, inner cell mass quality, and trophectoderm appearance. Results will be reported as the proportion of embryos achieving good-quality blastocyst grade per standard scoring system.

    Time frame: From embryo warming until embryo transfer (within 2-6 hours post-warming)

  4. Technical or embryological adverse events.

    defined as any unexpected or unfavorable technical or laboratory-related events occurring during blastocyst warming, handling, culture, or preparation for transfer, including damage to the embryo, procedural errors, or protocol deviations that may affect embryo viability.

    Time frame: From blastocyst warming until embryo transfer, within the same clinical procedure (up to 6 hours post-warming)

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boyard J, Reignier A, Chtourou S, Lefebvre T, Barriere P, Freour T. Should artificial shrinkage be performed prior to blastocyst vitrification? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Feb;25(1):24-32. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1701205. Epub 2020 Jan 24. PubMed 31973647 ↗
  • George JS, Keefe KW. Freezer burn or learning curve? Prolonged time since blastocyst vitrification and impact on pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2023 Jan;119(1):45-46. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.017. Epub 2022 Nov 19. No abstract available. PubMed 36410446 ↗
  • Gunst J, Joris H, Vynck M, Godderis K, Vercammen M, Roggeman S, van de Vijver A. Validation and clinical study of single-step vitrification combined with single-step warming of human blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2026 Mar;43(3):837-850. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03790-1. Epub 2026 Feb 13. PubMed 41686351 ↗
  • Kovacic B, Taborin M, Vlaisavljevic V, Reljic M, Knez J. To collapse or not to collapse blastocysts before vitrification? A matched case-control study on single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Oct;45(4):669-678. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.030. Epub 2022 Apr 10. PubMed 35963753 ↗
  • Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2794-801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu246. Epub 2014 Oct 14. PubMed 25316444 ↗
  • Martinez-Rodero I, Gallardo M, Pisaturo V, Scarica C, Conaghan J, Liebermann J, Cuevas-Saiz I. Shorter protocols for vitrification and post-warming dilution of human oocytes and embryos: a narrative review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2025 Aug;51(2):104857. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.104857. Epub 2025 Feb 7. PubMed 40479947 ↗
  • Perez-Sanchez M, Pardinas ML, Diez-Juan A, Quinonero A, Dominguez F, Martin A, Vidal C, Beltran D, Mifsud A, Mercader A, Pellicer A, Cobo A, de Los Santos MJ. The effect of vitrification on blastocyst mitochondrial DNA dynamics and gene expression profiles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Nov;40(11):2577-2589. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02952-3. Epub 2023 Oct 6. PubMed 37801195 ↗
  • Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, Vanderpoel S, Racowsky C. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):139-155. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038. PubMed 27827818 ↗
  • Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Campos G, Greco PF, Mondrone G, Surbone A, Greco E, Talevi R, Pluchino N, Fleming S. Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 May 17;12:1398049. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1398049. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38827525 ↗
  • Sekhon L, Lee JA, Flisser E, Copperman AB, Stein D. Blastocyst vitrification, cryostorage and warming does not affect live birth rate, infant birth weight or timing of delivery. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Jul;37(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Apr 21. PubMed 29706285 ↗
  • Van Landuyt L, Polyzos NP, De Munck N, Blockeel C, Van de Velde H, Verheyen G. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2509-18. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev218. Epub 2015 Sep 12. PubMed 26364080 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 18 months after the start.

Of 385 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Infertility, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 416 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 13, 2026
First posted
Apr 29, 2026
StartActual
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2028
Last update
Jun 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07556601
Lead sponsor
Fundacion Dexeus
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 29, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 30, 2026

Study contacts

Monica Parriego, PhD
Contact
monpar@dexeus.com
0034932274700
Ignacio Rodríguez, MSc
Contact
nacrod@dexeus.com
0034932274700 ext. 22029

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion