ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07555093SMART-MMSUpdated Jul 1, 2026

A Study of Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) to Increase Adherence With Digital Technology

An interventional study of Bottle pack and Blister pack in Pregnancy and Adherence, sponsored by Summit Institute for Development, Indonesia. Recruiting at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to female participants aged 14 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by Summit Institute for Development, Indonesia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10,012
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn whether a digital health intervention can improve adherence to Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) among pregnant women in Lombok Island. The study also aims to understand how individual characteristics, socio-economic factors, maternal health status, and antenatal care services influence adherence to MMS.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does a digitally supported intervention increase adherence to MMS compared to standard care?
  2. Does the type of MMS packaging (bottle vs. blister) affect adherence?
  3. In the second stage, does adding calcium supplementation affect adherence to MMS?

Researchers will compare four groups to see if digital support and packaging type improve MMS adherence:

  1. Standard care with MMS in bottles
  2. Standard care with MMS in blister packs
  3. Digital intervention with MMS in bottles
  4. Digital intervention with MMS in blister packs

Approximately 10,012 pregnant women will be randomly assigned to one of these four groups using a 2×2 factorial design.

Participants will:

  1. Receive MMS through either bottle or blister packaging
  2. Receive either standard care or a digital health intervention (such as reminders or digital support tools)
  3. Attend routine antenatal care services
  4. Be followed throughout pregnancy, delivery, and up to 42 days after childbirth

In the second stage of the study, participants from community health posts (Posyandu) will also receive calcium supplementation in addition to MMS. Additional 900 pregnant women will be enrolled from the same Puskesmas areas participating in the MMS study to evaluate the addition of calcium supplementation. These participants will be recruited outside of the main MMS cohort and will be equally distributed across the four study arms. This stage aims to assess whether adding calcium supplementation influences adherence to MMS among pregnant women.

Participants will be monitored during pregnancy, at delivery, and during the postnatal care period up to 42 days after birth.

This study represents an early implementation of Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) in Lombok Island, where MMS is not yet routinely available through government programs. Only selected primary healthcare centers (Puskesmas) that are randomized into the study will provide MMS to eligible participants. While the government has begun introducing MMS in other areas, it has not yet been implemented in Lombok.

The digital health intervention will only be provided to pregnant women who agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent. All participants will continue to receive standard antenatal care (ANC) services in accordance with existing government programs.

This study is also integrated with the ongoing distribution of iron and folic acid supplementation (TTD) in Lombok. Pregnant women who do not consent to participate in the study or do not receive MMS will continue to receive TTD as part of routine care outside of the study.

Read the detailed description

This study is a nested (two-stage) cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in Lombok Island, designed to evaluate strategies to improve adherence to Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) among pregnant women, as well as to assess the feasibility of integrating calcium supplementation into the MMS program within routine health systems.

The first stage of the study consists of a cluster randomized trial at the puskesmas (primary healthcare center) level. Puskesmas are randomized into four intervention arms to evaluate the effectiveness of different delivery approaches for MMS, specifically comparing combinations of digital and non-digital strategies, as well as packaging formats. The digital intervention includes mobile-based tools such as WhatsApp reminders, chatbot-assisted education, call center support, and a gamified alert system to encourage adherence. Artificial intelligence-based approaches, including adherence monitoring and prediction models, will also be explored. The non-digital group receives standard antenatal and postnatal care services, including routine health promotion and printed educational materials.

The second stage involves a cluster randomized trial at the posyandu (community health post) level within selected puskesmas. This stage evaluates the addition of calcium supplementation to MMS compared with MMS alone. Additional pregnant women will be enrolled outside the main MMS cohort and distributed across study arms. This component aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and operational considerations of co-administering calcium alongside MMS within the existing health system.

To support implementation across both study components, several operational and digital systems will be applied. Each supplement package will be labeled with a unique QR code to enable real-time tracking of supplement distribution and consumption through KoboToolbox. A Dynamic Worker Support (DWS) system will be implemented to assist Community Health Promoters in automated scheduling, task management, and field activity optimization.

Sample Size and Statistical Considerations

The sample size has been calculated based on the primary outcome of MMS adherence, accounting for clustering effects at both puskesmas and posyandu levels. Approximately 10,012 pregnant women will be enrolled in Stage 1 across 60 puskesmas clusters. In Stage 2, approximately 900 additional participants will be recruited to evaluate calcium co-supplementation. The sample size is designed to ensure adequate statistical power to detect meaningful differences between study groups.

A comprehensive quality assurance framework will be implemented to ensure data integrity, accuracy, and consistency across all study sites. Electronic data capture systems (KoboToolbox) will incorporate built-in validation rules, including range checks, consistency checks, and logical constraints across related variables. In addition, data validation will be strengthened through a double data entry process, whereby selected records are entered independently by two data entry personnel and discrepancies are identified and resolved through predefined verification procedures.

Routine centralized data monitoring will be conducted to assess data completeness, timeliness, and internal consistency. In addition, quality assurance (QA) activities will be implemented to assess field staff performance through direct verification. This includes periodic visits by QA staff to pregnant women to validate home visit activities conducted by field workers. QA may also be conducted through HealthComm by contacting participants to confirm services received and ensure consistency with reported data. These procedures aim to ensure adherence to study protocols, verify implementation fidelity, and maintain overall data quality.

A standardized data management system will be implemented, including a comprehensive data dictionary that defines all study variables, formats, permissible values, coding structures, and data sources. Where applicable, standardized coding approaches will be applied to ensure consistency.

All study procedures will be guided by Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and a detailed field manual to ensure standardized implementation across sites. The field manual provides step-by-step operational guidance for field staff, including participant recruitment, informed consent procedures, home visit protocols, supplement distribution, digital system utilization, and data collection processes.

It also outlines procedures for data management, adverse event reporting, and communication workflows between field teams and supervisors. Field staff, including Community Health Promoters, will receive structured training and ongoing supervision based on the field manual to ensure consistent, accurate, and high-quality implementation throughout the study.

Data quality checks during data collection will aim to minimize missingness. During analysis, appropriate statistical techniques, such as multiple imputation or sensitivity analyses, will be applied as specified in the statistical analysis plan.

All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Primary analyses will assess adherence to MMS across intervention arms using mixed-effects regression models to account for cluster randomization and potential confounders. The factorial design allows estimation of the independent and interaction effects of digital intervention and packaging type.

Secondary analyses will examine factors influencing adherence, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and the impact of calcium co-supplementation. Depending on the nature of the outcome variables, appropriate generalized linear (mixed-effects) models will be employed. Binary outcomes will be analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression models, continuous outcomes using linear mixed-effects models, and count or proportion outcomes using Poisson or binomial-based models with appropriate link functions. All models will account for clustering at the study design level and adjust for relevant covariates. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness and generalizability of the findings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy
  • Adherence

Keywords

  • MMS
  • Pregnancy
  • Digitalization
  • adherence
  • Antenatal Care
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Summit Institute for Development, Indonesia is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women up to 32 weeks
  • Pregnant women stay in the site at least during the study period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lost to follow up
  • Moving to another area
  • Death
  • Abortus
  • Stillbirth
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10,012 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Digital Care with Blister

    Participant will get All Standard Care components, MMS provided in blister packaging, daily automated and personalized WhatsApp reminders, WhatsApp, MMS Consumption reminder, Call center, Personalized education via chatbot and consultations, Gamification and alert system, AI monitoring and prediction

    Dietary Supplement: Blister pack · Other: Digital care

  • Active comparator
    Standard Care with Bottle

    Participant will receive standard ANC and PNC services, regular health promotion and printed material, MMS provided in bottle packaging, and no digital adherence support is provided.

    Dietary Supplement: Bottle pack · Other: Standard Care

  • Active comparator
    Standard Care with Blister

    Participant will receive standard ANC and PNC services, regular health promotion and printed material, MMS provided in blister packaging, no digital adherence support is provided.

    Dietary Supplement: Blister pack · Other: Standard Care

  • Experimental
    Digital Care with Bottle

    Participant will get all standard care components, MMS provided in bottle form, daily automated am personalized WhatsApp reminders, WhatsApp MMS consumption reminder, call center, personalized education via chatbot and consultations, gamification and alert system, AI monitoring and prediction

    Dietary Supplement: Bottle pack · Other: Digital care

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementBottle pack

    Bottle packaging of MMS

  • Dietary supplementBlister pack

    Blister packaging of MMS

  • OtherStandard Care

    Standard ANC and PNC services, regular health promotion and printed material

  • OtherDigital care

    In addition to standard care, participants get intervention such as: Daily automated and personalized WhatsApp reminders, Whatsapp MMS consumption reminder, call center, personalized education via chatbot and consultations, gamification and alert system, AI monitoring and prediction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MMS consumption Adherence

    Adherence is defined as the proportion of recommended daily MMS doses consumed over the total number of follow-up days, measured from enrolment until delivery (up to approximately 280 days of gestation). Adherence will be assessed using digital tracking data (QR code scans), self-reports, and/or supplement counts. Data will be collected monthly, and the final adherence value will be calculated as the mean of monthly adherence measurements per participant. Comparisons will be conducted across four study arms: (1) digital care with blister packaging, (2) standard care with bottle packaging, (3) standard care with blister packaging, and (4) digital care with bottle packaging.

    Time frame: Since enrolment until delivery (up to approximately 280 days of gestation), with monthly assessments

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gestational Age at Birth

    Gestational age (GA) will be calculated in completed weeks based on first-trimester ultrasound where available (preferred), or last menstrual period if ultrasound is unavailable. Mean GA at delivery will be reported.

    Time frame: Birth

  2. Proportion of Preterm Birth

    Proportion of live births occurring at \<37 completed weeks of gestation.

    Time frame: Birth

  3. Proportion of Very and Extremely Preterm Birth

    Proportion of pregnancies delivered before these gestational age: at \<34 weeks, \<32 weeks, and \<28

    Time frame: Birth

  4. Proportion of Post-term Birth

    Proportion of live births occurring at \>42 completed weeks of gestation.

    Time frame: Birth

  5. Proportion of Stillbirth

    Proportion of pregnancies resulting in fetal death ≥28 weeks of gestation occurring before or during labor and before complete expulsion or extraction.

    Time frame: Birth

  6. Perinatal Mortality

    Stillbirth (≥28 weeks gestation) or death of a liveborn infant within 7 completed days of birth.

    Time frame: Within 28 weeks of gestation to 7 days of birth

  7. Neonatal Mortality

    Death of a liveborn infant within 28 completed days of birth.

    Time frame: Within 28 days of birth

  8. Early Neonatal Mortality

    Death within 7 completed days of birth.

    Time frame: Within 7 days of birth

  9. Late Neonatal Mortality

    Death occurs after 7 days but within 28 days of birth.

    Time frame: Between 7 and 28 days of birth

  10. Birth Weight

    Mean birth weight (grams), measured within 1 hour of birth using calibrated mechanical or digital scales.

    Time frame: Within 1 hour of birth

  11. Proportion Low Birth Weight (LBW)

    Proportion of infants with birth weight \<2500 g (≤2500 g if scale increments are 100 g) among live born infants.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of birth

  12. Small for Gestational Age (SGA, 3rd Centile)

    Proportion of infants with birth weight \<3rd centile of INTERGROWTH-21st standards by gestational age and sex.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of birth

  13. Large for Gestational Age (LGA, 90th Centile)

    Proportion of infants with birth weight (grams) \>90th centile of INTERGROWTH-21st standards by gestational age and sex.

    Time frame: Birth

  14. Birth Length

    Mean birth length (cm).

    Time frame: Birth

  15. Short for Gestational Age (10th Centile)

    Proportion of infants with birth length (cm) \<10th centile of INTERGROWTH-21st standards by gestational age and sex.

    Time frame: Birth

  16. Short for Gestational Age (3rd Centile)

    Proportion of infants with birth length (cm) \<3rd centile of INTERGROWTH-21st standards by gestational age and sex.

    Time frame: Birth

  17. Head Circumference

    Mean head circumference at birth (cm).

    Time frame: Birth

  18. Infant Sex

    Proportion of male and female live births.

    Time frame: Birth

  19. Length-for-age z-score (LAZ)

    Mean length (cm)-for-age z-score (LAZ)

    Time frame: Within 28 days of birth

  20. Weight-for-Length Z-score (WLZ)

    Mean weight (gram)-for-age z-score (WAZ)

    Time frame: Within 28 days of birth

  21. Weight-for-Age Z-score (WAZ)

    Mean weight (gram)-for-length z-score (WLZ)

    Time frame: Within 28 days of birth

  22. Stunting

    Proportion of infants with Length-for-Age Z-score (LAZ) \< -2 SD at 1 month. LAZ is calculated based on the WHO Child Growth Standards for infants. Lower scores indicate poorer linear growth, and a score below -2 SD is classified as stunting.

    Time frame: Within 28 days of birth

  23. Wasting

    Proportion of infants with Weight-for-Length Z-score (WLZ) \< -2 SD at 6 months. WLZ is calculated based on the WHO Child Growth Standards for infants. Lower scores indicate acute malnutrition, and a score below -2 SD is classified as wasting.

    Time frame: Within 28 days of birth

  24. Underweight

    Proportion of infants with Weight-for-Age Z-score (WAZ) \< -2 SD at 6 months. WAZ is calculated based on the WHO Child Growth Standards for infants. Lower scores indicate poorer weight status, and a score below -2 SD is classified as underweight.

    Time frame: Within 28 days of birth

  25. Cost effectiveness

    The total cost required for each treatment group divided by The number of pregnant women who adhere with supplementation consumption in each treatment group.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year from the start of enrolment to the end of all monitoring phase

  26. Calcium adherence

    Adherence will be defined as the proportion of recommended daily doses consumed from week 20 until delivery. Dose consumption will be measured using digital tracking data (QR code scans), self-reports, and/or supplement counts where applicable. The outcome will be expressed as mean adherence proportion (%) per participant.

    Time frame: From 20 weeks until delivery (up to approximately 280 days of gestation), with monthly assessments

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Battung SM, Groen H, van der Beek EM. Prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation in the Parepare district, Indonesia; population characteristics and intake adherence. BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 12;25(1):983. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22129-0. PubMed 40075311 ↗
  • Dwarkanath P, Muhihi A, Sudfeld CR, Wylie BJ, Wang M, Perumal N, Thomas T, Kinyogoli SM, Bakari M, Fernandez R, Raj JM, Swai NO, Buggi N, Shobha R, Sando MM, Duggan CP, Masanja HM, Kurpad AV, Pembe AB, Fawzi WW. Two Randomized Trials of Low-Dose Calcium Supplementation in Pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):143-153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307212. PubMed 38197817 ↗
  • Hofmeyr GJ, Betran AP, Singata-Madliki M, Cormick G, Munjanja SP, Fawcus S, Mose S, Hall D, Ciganda A, Seuc AH, Lawrie TA, Bergel E, Roberts JM, von Dadelszen P, Belizan JM; Calcium and Pre-eclampsia Study Group. Prepregnancy and early pregnancy calcium supplementation among women at high risk of pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):330-339. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31818-X. PubMed 30696573 ↗
  • Borrelli EP, Saad P, Barnes NE, Dumitru D, Lucaci JD. Improving Adherence and Reducing Health Care Costs Through Blister-Packaging: An Economic Model for a Commercially Insured Health Plan. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Oct 3;16:733-745. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S480890. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39376478 ↗
  • Smith ER, Gomes F, Adu-Afarwuah S, Aguayo VM, El Arifeen S, Bhutta ZA, Caniglia EC, Christian P, Devakumar D, Dewey KG, Fawzi WW, Friis H, Gomo E, Guindo O, Hallamaa L, Isanaka S, Kaestel P, Lachat C, Maleta K, Moore SE, Oakley EM, Osrin D, Rahman A, Rana Z, Rizvi A, Roberfroid D, Shaikh S, Sonko B, Soofi SB, Subarkah I, Sunawang R, Wang D, West KP Jr, Wu LSF, Zagre N, Bourassa MW, Sudfeld CR. Contribution of Maternal Adherence to the Effect of Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2025 Jul;16(7):100455. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100455. Epub 2025 May 30. PubMed 40451462 ↗
  • Berti C, Gaffey MF, Bhutta ZA, Cetin I. Multiple-micronutrient supplementation: Evidence from large-scale prenatal programmes on coverage, compliance and impact. Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Dec;14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):e12531. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12531. Epub 2017 Dec 22. PubMed 29271119 ↗
  • Black J. Field trials of health interventions: a toolbox. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017;41(4):452.
  • Offorha BC, Walters SJ, Jacques RM. Analysing cluster randomised controlled trials using GLMM, GEE1, GEE2, and QIF: results from four case studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02107-z. PubMed 38093221 ↗
  • Billot L, Copas A, Leyrat C, Forbes A, Turner EL. How should a cluster randomized trial be analyzed? J Epidemiol Popul Health. 2024 Feb;72(1):202196. doi: 10.1016/j.jeph.2024.202196. Epub 2024 Feb 10. PubMed 38477477 ↗
  • Kerr J, Rosenberg D, Millstein RA, Bolling K, Crist K, Takemoto M, Godbole S, Moran K, Natarajan L, Castro-Sweet C, Buchner D. Cluster randomized controlled trial of a multilevel physical activity intervention for older adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Apr 2;15(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0658-4. PubMed 29609594 ↗
  • Toropova A, Bjorklund C, Bergstrom G, Elinder LS, Stigmar K, Wahlin C, Jensen I, Kwak L. Effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy for improving adherence to the guideline for prevention of mental ill-health among school personnel in Sweden: a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01196-6. PubMed 35279176 ↗
  • Ingersoll KS, Cohen J. The impact of medication regimen factors on adherence to chronic treatment: a review of literature. J Behav Med. 2008 Jun;31(3):213-24. doi: 10.1007/s10865-007-9147-y. Epub 2008 Jan 19. PubMed 18202907 ↗
  • Mishra M, Parida D, Murmu J, Singh D, Rehman T, Kshatri JS, Pati S. Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Monitoring Antenatal Care among Pregnant Women in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;11(19):2635. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192635. PubMed 37830672 ↗
  • Mamo TT, Ashenafi E, Gube AA, Bekele T. Adherence to prenatal iron-folic acid supplementation and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care services in Dilla town, South Ethiopia. Med Access Point Care. 2021 Apr 26;5:23992026211008805. doi: 10.1177/23992026211008805. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. PubMed 36204490 ↗
  • Yismaw AE, Tulu HB, Kassie FY, Araya BM. Iron-folic acid adherence and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Metema District, Northwest Ethiopia. Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;10:978084. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.978084. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36466514 ↗
  • Begum K, Ouedraogo CT, Wessells KR, Young RR, Faye MT, Wuehler SE, Hess SY. Prevalence of and factors associated with antenatal care seeking and adherence to recommended iron-folic acid supplementation among pregnant women in Zinder, Niger. Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Feb;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e12466. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12466. PubMed 29493896 ↗
  • Desta M, Kassie B, Chanie H, Mulugeta H, Yirga T, Temesgen H, Leshargie CT, Merkeb Y. Adherence of iron and folic acid supplementation and determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health. 2019 Dec 21;16(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0848-9. PubMed 31864397 ↗
  • Schneider PJ, Murphy JE, Pedersen CA. Impact of medication packaging on adherence and treatment outcomes in older ambulatory patients. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2008 Jan-Feb;48(1):58-63. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07040. PubMed 18192132 ↗
  • Lavigne JE, Falbo K, Gutierrez PM. Cost-utility analysis of blister packaging all outpatient medications for veterans with bipolar disorder, major affective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder or schizophrenia. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research [Internet]. 2019 Nov 3 [cited 2025 Mar 22];10(4):401-6. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jphs.12324
  • Byamugisha J, Adero N, Kiwanuka TS, Nalwadda CK, Ntuyo P, Namagembe I, Nabunya E, Nakirijja E, Mwadime-Ngolo R, Mukasa DC, Ononge S. The effect of blister packaging Iron and Folate on adherence to medication and hemoglobin levels among pregnant women at National Referral Hospital antenatal clinics in a low to middle income country: a Randomised Controlled Trial (The IFAd Trial). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04507-3. PubMed 35241006 ↗
  • PROTECTION, CHILD SAFETY AND ANTI-COUNTERFEIT TECHNOLOGY. [cited 2025 Mar 22]; Available from: https://www.cpsc.gov/Regulations-Laws--Standards/Statutes/
  • WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK409108/ PubMed 28079998 ↗
  • Cuevas AM, Germain AM. Diet and endothelial function. Biol Res. 2004;37(2):225-30. doi: 10.4067/s0716-97602004000200008. PubMed 15455651 ↗
  • dr. Maria Endang Sumiwi, dr. Lovely Daisy M, Mahmud Fauzi M, Rimbawan Ir Ali Khomsan Mk, Ir Dodik Briawan M, dr Endang Achadi ML, et al. Petunjuk Teknis Pemberian MMS Multivitamin Ibu Hamil. 2024. Report.
  • Gonzalez-Casanova I, Nguyen PH, Young MF, Harding KB, Reinhart G, Nguyen H, Nechitillo M, Truong TV, Pham H, Nguyen S, Neufeld LM, Martorell R, Ramakrishnan U. Predictors of adherence to micronutrient supplementation before and during pregnancy in Vietnam. BMC Public Health. 2017 May 16;17(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4379-4. PubMed 28511688 ↗
  • Priliani L, Prado EL, Restuadi R, Waturangi DE, Shankar AH, Malik SG. Maternal Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation Stabilizes Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Pregnant Women in Lombok, Indonesia. J Nutr. 2019 Aug 1;149(8):1309-1316. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz064. PubMed 31177276 ↗
  • Prado EL, Sebayang SK, Apriatni M, Adawiyah SR, Hidayati N, Islamiyah A, Siddiq S, Harefa B, Lum J, Alcock KJ, Ullman MT, Muadz H, Shankar AH. Maternal multiple micronutrient supplementation and other biomedical and socioenvironmental influences on children's cognition at age 9-12 years in Indonesia: follow-up of the SUMMIT randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Feb;5(2):e217-e228. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30354-0. PubMed 28104188 ↗
  • Supplementation with Multiple Micronutrients Intervention Trial (SUMMIT) Study Group; Shankar AH, Jahari AB, Sebayang SK, Aditiawarman, Apriatni M, Harefa B, Muadz H, Soesbandoro SD, Tjiong R, Fachry A, Shankar AV, Atmarita, Prihatini S, Sofia G. Effect of maternal multiple micronutrient supplementation on fetal loss and infant death in Indonesia: a double-blind cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):215-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60133-6. PubMed 18207017 ↗
  • Shao Y, Meng C, Liang YZ. Digital versus non-digital health interventions to improve iron supplementation in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 30;11:1375622. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1375622. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38873205 ↗
  • Calcium supplementation in pregnant women Guideline: Calcium supplementation in pregnant women. 2013 [cited 2025 Mar 22]; Available from: http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.htm
  • Cluver CA, Rohwer C, Rohwer AC. Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Dec 3;12(12):CD001059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001059.pub6. PubMed 41330480 ↗
  • Paramashanti BA, Nugraheny E, Suparmi S, Afifah T, Nugraheni WP, Purwatiningsih Y, Oktarina O, Mikrajab MA, Afifah E, Paratmanitya Y. Social determinants and socioeconomic inequalities in adherence to antenatal iron-folic acid supplementation in urban and rural Indonesia. Rural Remote Health. 2024 Nov;24(4):8722. doi: 10.22605/RRH8722. Epub 2024 Nov 8. PubMed 39522555 ↗
  • WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity: new guidelines 2021. Vol. 17. 2021;17:79.

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual Participant Data (IPD) requests must be submitted to the Principal Investigator and/or the lead research organization for further assessment and approval. Any request should clearly outline the purpose of data use, involved collaborators, proposed analysis plan, and intended publications. We would also like to be involved in all stages of the process, including preparation, data analysis, manuscript writing, and publication. Please note that, in principle, patient/client data belong to the respective individuals. Therefore, data sharing requires appropriate informed consent, which has been addressed in the approved study protocol. SID, as the lead research institution, will oversee and manage this process.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: The IPD and supporting information will be available upon reasonable request beginning 6 months after the publication of the primary results and will remain available for up to 3 years, or as long as ethically and legally permissible, in accordance with institutional and national data protection policies.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers may request access to de-identified individual participant data (IPD) and related documentation. Requests must be submitted in writing to the Principal Investigator and/or lead research organization (SID) and include a detailed research proposal outlining the purpose of the data use, analysis plan, intended collaborators, and publication strategy. Each request will be assessed and approved based on scientific merit, ethical compliance, and data protection considerations. Approved requesters will be required to sign a data use agreement. SID must be involved in all stages of the process, including preparation, analysis, manuscript writing, and publication.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 11 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2025
First posted
Apr 29, 2026
StartActual
Jun 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
Jul 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07555093
Lead sponsor
Summit Institute for Development, Indonesia
Collaborators
Children's Investment Fund Foundation, Sight and Life Foundation
Responsible party
Yuni Dwi Setiyawati (Chief Executive Officer, Summit Institute for Development, Indonesia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 29, 2026
Start date
Jun 13, 2026
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Study contacts

Yuni Dwi Setiyawati, MHID
Contact
yuni.setiyawati@sid-indonesia.org
+6285337006810

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion