A Phase 1 interventional study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Azacitidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, sponsored by OHSU Knight Cancer Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.
Sponsored by OHSU Knight Cancer Institute · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of ruxolitinib (Rux) therapy alone (monotherapy) followed by Rux plus azacitidine (AZA) maintenance therapy and to see how well it works in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). AlloHSCT provides the only chance for cure for many patients with AML. AlloHSCT is a procedure in which a person receives blood-forming stem cells (cells from which all blood cells develop) from a genetically similar, but not identical, donor. This is often a sister or brother, but could be an unrelated donor. One of the common reasons for death after an alloHSCT is graft versus host disease (GVHD), which occurs when the transplanted cells from the donor attacks the recipient's normal cells. Ruxolitinib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It works to treat GVHD by blocking the signals of the cells that cause GVHD. Azacitidine is in a class of medications called demethylation agents. It works by helping the bone marrow to produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells in the bone marrow. Giving Rux after the transplant may stop GVHD from occurring. Maintenance therapy with AZA, may help prevent or delay cancer from coming back. Giving Rux monotherapy followed by Rux plus AZA maintenance therapy may be safe, tolerable, and/or effective in treating patients with AML who are undergoing alloHSCT.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of Rux monotherapy (part A) and Rux plus AZA maintenance therapy (part B) following alloHSCT in AML patients.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the feasibility of Rux plus AZA maintenance. II. To evaluate the effect on measurable residual disease (MRD) of Rux plus AZA maintenance.
III. To evaluate the impact of post-alloHSCT Rux on neutrophil engraftment. IV. To evaluate the impact of post-alloHSCT Rux on platelet engraftment. V. To evaluate the frequency and timing of disease relapse after alloHSCT when treated with Rux +/- AZA maintenance.
VI. To evaluate risk of post alloHSCT acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) when treated with Rux +/- AZA maintenance.
VII. To evaluate risk of post alloHSCT chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) when treated with Rux +/- AZA maintenance.
VIII. To evaluate post alloHSCT survival in the absence of GVHD and disease relapse when treated with Rux +/- AZA maintenance.
IX. To evaluate the rate of post alloHSCT early infection when treated with Rux +/- AZA maintenance.
X. To evaluate overall survival after alloHSCT and treatment with Rux +/- AZA maintenance.
XI. To overall the effect on quality of life (QoL) of post alloHSCT Rux +/- AZA maintenance.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the impact of pre transplant disease characteristics on treatment outcomes.
II. To evaluate the impact of MRD on treatment outcomes. III. To explore biomarkers associated with treatment outcomes.
OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of azacitidine in combination with fixed-dose cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and ruxolitinib.
PART A: Patients undergo standard of care (SOC) reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) or non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning followed by alloHSCT on day 0 and receive cyclophosphamide intravenously (IV) over 1-2 hours on days +3 and +4, tacrolimus orally (PO) or IV daily on day + 5 and tapered per institutional protocol through day +180, and mycophenolate mofetil PO or IV three times daily (TID) on days +5 to +35 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Staring on day +5, patients also receive ruxolitinib PO twice daily (BID) continuously and tapered through post-treatment day 28. Treatment with ruxolitinib continues through screening of part B in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients not eligible for Part B have ruxolitinib tapered starting no later than day +100.
PART B: Starting no earlier than day +35 and no later than day +100, patients receive ruxolitinib PO BID continuously and tapered through post-treatment day 28, as well as azacitidine IV on days 1-5 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 8 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Additionally, patients undergo echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) during screening. Patients also undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow aspiration and biopsy throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months until 2 years.
2,971 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; 745 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 40 is close to the median of 41 across 2,509 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.
Browse Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute studies →OHSU Knight Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 242 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.
Of its 27 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (56%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
PART A: Only RIC or NMA conditioning must be plan and patient is not a candidate for myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide / tacrolimus / mycophenolate mofetil (PTCy/Tac/MMF) GVHD prophylaxis is planned with PTCy at 25 mg/kg/day on Day +3 and Day +4 post-HSCT
Permitted conditioning regimens (per institutional protocol)
Reduced-intensity conditioning:
Fludarabine/ melphalan
Non-Myeloablative Conditioning:
PART A: History of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is permitted given prior curative treatment or undetectable HCV viral load by serology or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing
Exclusion Criteria:
PART A: Patients with history of any other malignancy within the 5 years prior to screening, with the exception of the following:
PART A: Patients with known active severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection
See Detailed Description.
Procedure: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation · Drug: Azacitidine · Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Procedure: Echocardiography Test · Other: Electronic Health Record Review · Procedure: Multigated Acquisition Scan · Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil · Other: Reduced-Intensity Transplant Conditioning Procedure · Drug: Ruxolitinib · Other: Survey Administration · Drug: Tacrolimus
Undergo alloHSCT
Also known as: Allogeneic, Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, HSC, HSCT, Stem Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic
Given IV
Also known as: 5 AZC, 5-AC, 5-Azacitidine, 5-Azacytidine, 5-AZC, Azacytidine, Azacytidine, 5-, Ladakamycin, Mylosar, U-18496, Vidaza
Undergo blood sample collection
Also known as: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone marrow aspiration
Undergo bone marrow biopsy
Also known as: Biopsy of Bone Marrow, Biopsy, Bone Marrow
Given IV
Also known as: (-)-Cyclophosphamide, 2H-1,3,2-Oxazaphosphorine, 2-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro-, 2-oxide, monohydrate, Asta B 518, B 518, B-518, B518, Carloxan, Ciclofosfamida, Ciclofosfamide, Cicloxal, Clafen, Claphene, CP monohydrate, CTX, CYCLO-cell, Cycloblastin, Cycloblastine, Cyclophospham, Cyclophosphamid monohydrate, Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate, Cyclophosphamidum, Cyclophosphan, Cyclophosphane, Cyclophosphanum, Cyclostin, Cyclostine, Cytophosphan, Cytophosphane, Cytoxan, Fosfaseron, Frindovyx, Genoxal, Genuxal, Ledoxina, Mitoxan, Neosar, Revimmune, Syklofosfamid, WR 138719, WR- 138719, WR-138719, WR138719
Undergo ECHO
Also known as: EC, Echocardiography
Ancillary studies
Undergo MUGA
Also known as: Blood Pool Scan, Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography, Gated Blood Pool Imaging, Gated Heart Pool Scan, MUGA, MUGA Scan, Multi-Gated Acquisition Scan, Radionuclide Ventriculogram Scan, Radionuclide Ventriculography, RNV Scan, RNVG, SYMA Scanning, Synchronized Multigated Acquisition Scanning
Given PO or IV
Also known as: CellCept, MMF, Myhibbin
Undergo SOC RIC or NMA conditioning
Also known as: Non-Myeloablative Conditioning, Reduced Intensity Conditioning, Reduced Intensity Conditioning/Reduced Toxicity Conditioning
Given PO
Also known as: INCB 018424, INCB-018424, INCB-18424, INCB18424, Oral JAK Inhibitor INCB18424
Ancillary studies
Given PO or IV
Also known as: FK 506, FK-506, FK506, Fujimycin, Hecoria, Prograf, Protopic, Tacforius
Incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs)
Will determine the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib monotherapy (part A) and ruxolitinib plus azacitidine therapy (part B). DLTs will be used to identify a maximum tolerated dose. Dose levels will either be de-escalated, escalated, or retained-according to pre calculated Bayesian Optimal Interval decision rules.
Time frame: From cycle 1 day 1 (i.e., day +5 post-transplant) to end of cycle 2 (Cycle length = 28 days)
Incidence of grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (Part B)
TRAEs of grade 3 and higher experienced during treatment with the doublet of ruxolitinib + azacitidine will be reported (with frequencies and percentages) as a co-primary endpoint. TRAEs are defined as adverse events that are definitely or possibly attributable to study treatment. Will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, where adverse events are assessed on a scale of 1-5, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after the end of cycle 9
Graft versus host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, with estimates provided for the median time-to-event (with 95% log-log confidence interval \[CI\]) and event rates (and 95% log-log CIs) at landmark times like 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).
Time frame: From date of transplant to disease relapse, grade III-IV acute (a) GVHD, chronic (c) GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy, or death from any cause or last known alive (censored), whichever occurs earlier, assessed up to 2 years
Overall survival
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, with estimates provided for the median time-to-event (with 95% log-log CI) and event rates (and 95% log-log CIs) at landmark times like 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-allogeneic HSCT.
Time frame: From date of transplant to last known alive (censored) or death date, assessed up to 2 years
Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment
Deaths in the absence of the event of interest will be considered as a competing risk. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) estimates will be provided with 95% CIs at landmark times (e.g., day +30, day +60, day +100) for each time-to-event endpoint with a competing risk.
Time frame: From date of transplant to 30 days post-HSCT
Cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment
Deaths in the absence of the event of interest will be considered as a competing risk. CIF estimates will be provided with 95% CIs at landmark times (e.g., day +30, day +60, day +100) for each time-to-event endpoint with a competing risk.
Time frame: From date of transplant to 100 days post-HSCT but prior to Part B
Cumulative incidence of Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network grade 2-3 infections
Deaths in the absence of the event of interest will be considered as a competing risk. CIF estimates will be provided with 95% CIs at landmark times (e.g., day +30, day +60, day +100) for each time-to-event endpoint with a competing risk.
Time frame: From date of transplant to 100 days post-HSCT
Cumulative incidence of grade ≥ II aGVHD
Will be assessed using Mount Sinai Acute Graft Versus Host Disease International Consortium criteria. Deaths in the absence of the event of interest will be considered as a competing risk. CIF estimates will be provided with 95% CIs at landmark times (e.g., day +30, day +60, day +100) for each time-to-event endpoint with a competing risk.
Time frame: From date of transplant to end of study, assessed up to 2 years
Cumulative incidence of cGVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy
Deaths in the absence of the event of interest will be considered as a competing risk. CIF estimates will be provided with 95% CIs at landmark times (e.g., day +30, day +60, day +100) for each time-to-event endpoint with a competing risk.
Time frame: From day +100 post-HSCT to end of study, assessed up to 2 years
Cumulative incidence of relapse
Deaths in the absence of the event of interest will be considered as a competing risk. CIF estimates will be provided with 95% CIs at landmark times (e.g., day +30, day +60, day +100) for each time-to-event endpoint with a competing risk.
Time frame: From date of transplant to end of study, assessed up to 2 years
Percentage of part A participants enrolled on part B (Feasibility)
Descriptive summaries of discrete data will present the sample size and the incidence as frequency count and percentage, with exact binomial 95% CI.
Time frame: From part A screening (day -28 to day -5 pre-transplant) to part B screening (day +35 post-HSCT to day +100 post-HSCT) assessed up to 128 days
Median time from transplant to part B enrollment (Feasibility)
Descriptive summaries of continuous data will present mean and standard deviation, or median, interquartile range, and range, depending on the sample distribution of the continuous variable.
Time frame: From part A screening (day -28 to day -5 pre-transplant) to part B screening (day +35 post-HSCT to day +100 post-HSCT) assessed up to 128 days
Patient reported quality of life outcome measurements, using the FACT-BMT patient reported outcome questionnaires
Descriptive summaries of discrete data will present the sample size and the incidence as frequency count and percentage, with exact binomial 95% CI.
Time frame: From time of part A screening to 365 days post-HSCT
Conversion rate of pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) positive to negative
Time frame: From pre-transplant MRD assessment date to 1 year on study treatment or end of therapy, whichever occurs later, assessed up to 2 years
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute