CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07547397syringe-freeUpdated Apr 23, 2026

COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL AND SYRINGE-FREE TECHNIQUES IN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED CENTRAL JUGULAR VENOUS CATHETERIZATION

An interventional study of out-of-plane technique and in-plane technique in Central Venous Catheters/Standards, Ultrasonography/Methods and Ultrasonography/Standards, sponsored by ALİEMAN. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-23.

Sponsored by ALİEMAN · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

During central venous catheterization, both in-plane and out-of-plane techniques can be used. In the in-plane technique, the entire needle can be visualized with ultrasound. In the in-plane technique with a linear probe, the vessel and needle are visualized longitudinally. In the syringe technique, a guide needle attached to a syringe is first inserted into the vein and blood is aspirated, then the catheter is placed through a wire sent into the vein via the needle. This procedure is performed under ultrasound guidance, visualizing the vessels, guide wire, and needle.

In the syringe-less technique, the guide wire is placed inside the needle and sent directly into the vein. In this technique, there is no need to draw blood into the syringe to confirm that it is in the vein.

The aim of our study is to compare the two ultrasound-guided techniques in terms of procedure time, number of attempts, and complication rates. We expect the syringe-less technique to have a shorter procedure time, fewer attempts, and a lower complication rate.

Read the detailed description

Today, central venous catheters are frequently placed in operating rooms, intensive care units, and emergency departments for reasons such as intravenous fluid and drug infusion, measurement of cardiac parameters, inability to find a vein, total parenteral nutrition, septic shock, and similar critical illnesses. Performing central venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance has reduced the number of attempts, procedure time, and intra-procedure complications. International guidelines recommend the standard use of ultrasound in central venous catheterization. During ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement, the vessels and needle can be simultaneously visualized. Both in-plane and out-of-plane techniques can be used during the catheterization procedure. In the in-plane technique, the entire needle is visualized by ultrasound. In the in-plane technique with a linear probe, the vessel and needle are visualized longitudinally. In the syringe technique, a guide needle attached to a syringe is first inserted into the vein to aspirate blood, and then the catheter is placed through a wire sent into the vein via the needle. This procedure is performed under ultrasound guidance, visualizing the vessels, guide wire, and needle.

In the syringe technique, a guide needle attached to a syringe is first inserted into the vein to aspirate blood, and then the catheter is placed through a wire sent into the vein via the needle. In the syringe-free technique, a guide wire is placed inside the needle and directly inserted into the vein. In this technique, there is no need to draw blood into a syringe to confirm that the needle is in the vein.

The aim of our study is to compare two ultrasound-guided techniques in terms of procedure time, number of attempts, and complication rates. We expect the syringe-free technique to have a shorter procedure time, fewer attempts, and a lower complication rate.

Materials and Methods Section:

The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, and single-blind study. Patients aged 18-85 years with an indication for central venous catheterization will be included in the study. Informed consent will be obtained from patients who will undergo surgery under general anesthesia before the anesthesia procedure.

Patients included in the study will be divided into two groups using computer-assisted randomization.

Patients in the first group will undergo central catheterization of the jugular vein using the Seldinger method (first inserting a guide wire and then inserting the catheter) with ultrasound guidance using an out-of-plane technique.

In the second group of patients, central jugular vein catheterization will be performed using the Seldinger method (with a guide wire) with in-plane technique (longitudinal visualization of the entire needle and vessel) under ultrasound guidance. A linear ultrasound probe will be used in both groups of patients during the procedure. The number of needle insertions, needle placements, number of attempts, and procedure time will be recorded and compared for both groups. In addition, rare complications such as bleeding, hemothorax, pneumothorax, hematoma, and carotid artery injury will be recorded. The ease of the procedure will be scored by the practitioner on a scale of 0 to 10 (0: most difficult, 10: easiest). The appearance of the needle, vessels, guide wire, and catheter on ultrasound will also be scored and recorded on a scale of 1 to 5 (very difficult: 1, difficult: 2, moderate: 3, easy appearance: 4, excellent: 5).

The recorded data will be compared between the two groups.

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged 18-85 years with indications for central venous catheterization in the operating room.

Exclusion Criteria:

Morbidly obese patients (BMI >40) Patients with severe coagulopathy Patients with severe neck deformity Patients with skin deformity or infection at the catheterization site Patients with congenital anomalies in the central veins

Sample Selection:

Considering previous studies on this subject, a total of 80 patients in both groups are needed to shorten the procedure time by 30%. Considering patients who may be excluded from the study, a total of 90 patients were planned to be included (α: 0.05, power 90%).

Statistical Method to be Used:

Continuous quantitative data will be presented as number, mean ± standard deviation. Qualitative variables will be expressed as median, 25th and 75th percentiles. Continuous variables with independent measurements and a normal distribution will be analyzed using the T-test. For data that do not show a normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney test will be applied. Chi-square tests will be applied to categorical data, and p \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Central Venous Catheters/Standards
  • Ultrasonography/Methods
  • Ultrasonography/Standards

Keywords

  • central venous catheterization with and without syringe
03

In context

Lead sponsor

ALİEMAN is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18-85 years who have an indication for central venous catheterization in the operating room.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40)
  • Those with severe coagulopathy
  • Severe neck deformity
  • Skin deformity or infection at the catheterization site
  • Those with congenital anomalies in the central veins
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    with a syringe

    Central catheterization of the jugular vein will be performed using the Seldinger method (first inserting a guide wire, then placing the catheter over it) with ultrasound guidance and an out-of-plane technique. A guide needle attached to a syringe will be inserted into the vein to aspirate blood, and then a catheter will be placed over the wire sent into the vein through the needle. This procedure will be performed under ultrasound guidance, visualizing the veins, guide wire, and needle.

    Procedure: out-of-plane technique

  • Active comparator
    syringe-free technique

    In the syringe-free technique, a guide wire will be placed inside the needle and sent directly into the vein. In this technique, central jugular vein catheterization will be performed using the Seldinger method (using a guide wire) with an in-plane approach (visualizing the entire needle and vein longitudinally). There is no need to draw blood into a syringe to confirm that the needle is in the vein.

    Procedure: in-plane technique

Interventions

  • Procedureout-of-plane technique

    ultrasound-guided out-of-plane technique for central venous catheterization

  • Procedurein-plane technique

    In the syringe-free technique, a guide wire is placed inside the needle and sent directly into the vein. In this technique, there is no need to draw blood into the syringe to confirm its presence in the vein. Using ultrasound-guided in-plane technique (with the entire needle and vein visualized longitudinally), central catheterization of the jugular vein will be performed using the Seldinger method (with a guide wire).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. processing time

    The technique to be used will be determined according to the randomization performed. The procedure time will begin at the moment of the first needle insertion (syringe or catheter needle) after skin cleansing and will end at the placement of the jugular catheter without suturing.

    Time frame: The procedure time is expected to be 30% shorter with the syringe-free technique. Catheter insertion is expected to take around 120 seconds.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Balaban O, Turgut M, Aydin T. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachiocephalic vein catheterization in children: Syringe-free in-plane technique with micro-convex probe. J Vasc Access. 2020 Mar;21(2):241-245. doi: 10.1177/1129729819867221. Epub 2019 Sep 6. PubMed 32174238 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Patient demographic data Study protocol Statistical analysis data

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07547397
Lead sponsor
ALİEMAN
Responsible party
ALİEMAN (medical doctor, Sakarya University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 23, 2026
Start date
Mar 30, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 23, 2026

Study contacts

Ali Eman
Contact
dralieman02@gmail.com
+905325152816 ext. medical doctor
Onur Balaban, medical doctor
Contact
+905327000691

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion