CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07546370Updated Apr 22, 2026

The Effectiveness of Topical Prilocaine-Lidocaine Cream Plus Acetaminophen and Naproxen Compared to Lidocaine Injection Plus Acetaminophen and Naproxen to Manage Pain During IntraUterine Device Insertion

A Phase 4 interventional study of Prilocaine, Lidocaine and Lidocaine HCl 1% in Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion, sponsored by Monakshi Sawhney. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-22.

Sponsored by Monakshi Sawhney · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if two pain medications used to treat pain during intrauterine device insertions work in persons with a uterus. It will also learn about the safety of the two study medications.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does prilocaine lidocaine, acetaminophen and naproxen or lidocaine injection, acetaminophen and naproxen reduce pain during intrauterine device insertions.

Researchers will compare prilocaine lidocaine cream and lidocaine injection to see if it treats pain during an intrauterine device insertion.

Participants will be asked to:

  • take acetaminophen and naproxen prior to the procedure.
  • receive either prilocaine-lidocaine or lidocaine injection during the procedure
  • to fill out a survey on past medical history, anxiety, and pain.
Read the detailed description

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most recommended forms of birth control. An IUD is a small device placed inside the uterus to prevent pregnancy. Many individuals prefer the IUD as it does not require taking a pill every day. These devices are typically inserted in the patient's nurse practitioner's or physician's clinic. Intrauterine devices are very effective in preventing an unwanted pregnancy; however, the procedure can be painful. Without medication, individuals have described the pain as moderate to severe. Pain and the fear of experiencing pain are one reason why individuals choose not to get an IUD and choose less effective birth control. There are several pain relief options to help alleviate pain during IUD insertions, such as acetaminophen, naproxen, and local freezing medications. The local medications can be given as a cream or an injection. Unfortunately, not all health care providers offer pain relief options, and there is no consensus on which is the most effective. This study aims to use multiple pain relief options and compare the cream and the injectable medication to see which combination is more effective.

A total of 66 participants will take part in this study. Each participant will be randomly assigned to one of the pain management groups: anesthetic cream or injection. Before the procedure, participants will answer a questionnaire about their general health, demographics, and anxiety. Participants will be given acetaminophen and naproxen 45 minutes before the start of the procedure. During the procedure, participants will be asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0 to 10. After the procedure, participants will be asked to describe the pain they experienced.

The acute care pain guidelines recommend the use of multiple medications and the use of non-pharmacological methods such as distraction for pain relief. Prior studies have focused on one pain relief option for pain during IUD insertions. In addition, no prior study has compared the analgesic cream against the injectable analgesic. Conducting this study will aid in a clearer understanding of which pain relief measure is appropriate to use during IUD insertions. If both pain relief options are equally effective, then individuals will have a choice between the use of a cream or an injection for pain relief; the latter of which can also inflict pain.

The results of this study will be shared at conferences across the country and through scientific journals. The results will facilitate conversations among health care providers about appropriate pain management. Patients can use this information to advocate for improved pain relief during their procedures, thereby empowering persons with a cervix during gynecological procedures. The research team is largely made up of women who are nurses or nurse practitioners, a field that is predominantly female. This study will contribute to the growth of nurse-led research in women's reproductive health and can be used to inform decision-making and policy changes for improved pain control in women's reproductive health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pain
  • intrauterine device
  • prilocaine-lidocaine
  • lidocaine
  • contraception
03

In context

Pain

2,219 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 917 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 66 is close to the median of 70 across 1,904 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Monakshi Sawhney as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Nulliparous, parous female or non operative trans male
  • Participants want to have an IUD for contraception
  • Able to provide consent
  • Participants are between the ages of 18-45 years old
  • Individuals must meet the medical eligibility criteria for an IUD

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant or if pregnancy can not be ruled out the day of insertion
  • have abnormal uterine bleeding that has not been investigated
  • Lupus
  • liver disease
  • progesterone sensitive tumors
  • molar pregnancy
  • gynecological malignancy
  • breast cancer
  • clotting disorders
  • uterine anomalies
  • septic abortion within last three months
  • allergy to progesterone or copper
  • pelvic inflammatory disease
  • acute malignancies affecting blood
  • bacterial endocarditis
  • methemoglobinemia
  • allergy to prilocaine-lidocaine cream
  • actively breastfeeding
  • Participants taking beta-blockers and/ or antiarrhythmic drugs
  • Individuals who have taken opioids or benzodiazepines within 24 hours prior to the procedure
  • Participants who are currently using an IUD
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Prilocaine Lidocaine Arm

    Participants will received prilocaine lidocaine injection, acetaminophen and naproxen

    Drug: Lidocaine HCl 1%

  • Active comparator
    Lidocaine injection

    Participants will receive lidocaine injection, acetaminophen and naproxen

    Drug: Prilocaine, Lidocaine

Interventions

  • DrugPrilocaine, Lidocaine

    Participants in this arm will receive prilocaine lidocaine cream to their cervix (4 grams) to their cervix 5 minutes prior to the procedure.

    Also known as: EMLA

  • DrugLidocaine HCl 1%

    Participants will receive 1% lidocaine injected into the cervix (10mls) 5 minutes prior to the procedure

    Also known as: Lidocaine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale

    Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain

    Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment on day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. State Trait Anxiety Inventory

    Participants will answer a questionnaire on their level of anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. McGill Pain Questionnaire

    Participants will describe the pain/ if any they experienced during the procedure

    Time frame: end of treatment on day 1

  3. Ease of Insertion

    Clinicians inserting the intrauterine device will rate on a numerical scale the difficulty of inserting the device, zero being extremely easy and ten being extremely difficult.

    Time frame: end of treatment on day 1

  4. Non Pharmacological Measures

    Participants will answer a questionnaire on the type of nonpharmacological measures they used during the procedure

    Time frame: end of treatment on day 1

  5. Adverse Reactions

    Participants will answer a questionnaire about any adverse reactions they may have experienced.

    Time frame: at day 2

Other outcomes

  1. Demographic Information

    Participants will answer a questionnaire about their current and past health. In addition, to sociodemographic information ( such as age, sex, gender)

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Woodlawn Medical Clinic
    Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2W 2S7, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kirubarajan A, Gryn A, Werger M, Salim S, Ivanisevic S, Liu J, Wang S, Huszti E, Jacobson M, Flamer D, Spitzer RF, Sobel M. A double-blind, triple-arm randomized controlled trial of 1% lidocaine paracervical block for intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Contraception. 2026 Aug;160:111393. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2026.111393. Epub 2026 Jan 24. PubMed 41587631 ↗
  • Tavakolian S, Doulabi MA, Baghban AA, Mortazavi A, Ghorbani M. Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream as Analgesia for IUD Insertion: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Triple Blinded Study. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jan 27;7(4):399-404. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p399. PubMed 25946948 ↗
  • Samy A, Abbas AM, Mahmoud M, Taher A, Awad MH, El Husseiny T, Hussein M, Ramadan M, Shalaby MA, El Sharkawy M, Hatem D, Alaa-El-Din Wali A, Abd-El-Fatah SM, Hussein AH, Haggag H. Evaluating different pain lowering medications during intrauterine device insertion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2019 Mar;111(3):553-561.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.012. Epub 2019 Jan 2. PubMed 30611553 ↗
  • Nguyen L, Lamarche L, Lennox R, Ramdyal A, Patel T, Black M, Mangin D. Strategies to Mitigate Anxiety and Pain in Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Systematic Review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Sep;42(9):1138-1146.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Dec 25. PubMed 31882291 ↗
  • Karasu Y, Comert DK, Karadag B, Ergun Y. Lidocaine for pain control during intrauterine device insertion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Jun;43(6):1061-1066. doi: 10.1111/jog.13308. Epub 2017 May 15. PubMed 28503818 ↗
  • Mody SK, Farala JP, Jimenez B, Nishikawa M, Ngo LL. Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):575-582. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002790. PubMed 30095776 ↗
  • Lopes-Garcia EA, Carmona EV, Monteiro I, Bahamondes L. Assessment of pain and ease of intrauterine device placement according to type of device, parity, and mode of delivery. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023 Jun;28(3):163-167. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2023.2189500. Epub 2023 Mar 24. PubMed 36961099 ↗
  • Hunter TA, Sonalkar S, Schreiber CA, Perriera LK, Sammel MD, Akers AY. Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Feb;33(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 26. PubMed 31563628 ↗
  • Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available. PubMed 22588748 ↗
  • de Oliveira ECF, Baeta T, Brant APC, Silva-Filho A, Rocha ALL. Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01521-z. PubMed 34715839 ↗
  • Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman W, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM, Mansouri S. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Feb;38(2):182-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 26. English, French. PubMed 27032746 ↗
  • Bayer LL, Ahuja S, Allen RH, Gold MA, Levine JP, Ngo LL, Mody S. Best practices for reducing pain associated with intrauterine device placement. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May;232(5):409-421. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.039. Epub 2025 Feb 3. PubMed 39909325 ↗
  • Akers AY, Steinway C, Sonalkar S, Perriera LK, Schreiber C, Harding J, Garcia-Espana JF. Reducing Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Adolescents and Young Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):795-802. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002242. PubMed 28885425 ↗
  • Abbas AM, Abdellah MS, Khalaf M, Bahloul M, Abdellah NH, Ali MK, Abdelmagied AM. Effect of cervical lidocaine-prilocaine cream on pain perception during copper T380A intrauterine device insertion among parous women: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 4. PubMed 27823944 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07546370
Lead sponsor
Monakshi Sawhney
Collaborators
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
Responsible party
Monakshi Sawhney (Associate Professor of School of Nursing and Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2026
Start date
Apr 14, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 14, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 14, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2026

Study contacts

Aprill D Susin, NP, PhD(c)
Contact
aprill.susin@queensu.ca
19029890116
Monakshi Sawhney, NP, PhD
Contact
mona.sawhney@queensu.ca
14168160487
Monakshi Sawhney, NP, PhD
principal investigator · Queen's University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion