An interventional study of bar 3d printed metal fixed retainer and conventional fixed retainer in Bond, Pair, sponsored by Amany Ibrahim. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-20.
Sponsored by Amany Ibrahim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Despite the growing diversity of materials used for mandibular fixed retainers, the evidence base remains inconclusive. In particular, conflicting findings have been reported regarding the bond failure of titanium retainers across different evaluation periods, including immediate and 12-month outcomes. Additionally, the emergence of 3D metal-printed retainers has not yet been matched by sufficient clinical evidence, with current data being limited and lacking long-term validation.
In recent years, CAD/CAM technology and 3D printing have introduced new possibilities in orthodontic practice, with expanding applications across various treatment modalities. Additive manufacturing, commonly known as 3D printing, enables the fabrication of objects through the sequential layering of material to produce precise three-dimensional structures. While orthodontists are already familiar with 3D-printed appliances such as clear aligners, the application of these technologies in fixed retention is still evolving. Recent studies have reported the fabrication of customized lingual retainers using CAD/CAM techniques, including nickel-titanium-milled retainers and zirconia bars designed for use as bonded mandibular fixed retainers.
This is the only study on the registry with Amany Ibrahim as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: conventional fixed retainer
Device: bar 3d printed metal fixed retainer
Participants will receive a custom-designed 3D-printed metal fixed retainer. The retainer is digitally designed using intraoral scans and fabricated using metal 3D printing technology to achieve a precise fit tailored to each patient.
Participants will receive a conventional fixed bonded lingual retainer (canine-to-canine) fabricated using multistranded stainless steel wire and bonded using standard clinical procedures.
bond failure
Bond failure will be assessed clinically by detecting any detachment of the retainer from the tooth surface (number of debonded teeth).
Time frame: immediate (within 24 hours after bonding) and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
chairside time
Time measurement will start from the beginning of acid etching of the teeth and end after completion of composite curing for all bonded teeth. The duration will be recorded in minutes using a digital stopwatch by an independent assessor using a digital stopwatch (minutes)
Time frame: Periprocedural (during retainer bonding procedure on Day 1)
wire breakage
Time frame: Every 3months for 12 months
plaque accumulation
Plaque accumulation will be assessed using the Silness-Löe Plaque Index, which scores plaque presence on the tooth surface adjacent to the fixed retainer. Each tooth will be scored on a scale from 0 to 3: 0: No plaque 1. Thin film of plaque detectable by probe 2. Moderate accumulation visible to the naked eye 3. Abundant plaque accumulation Assessment will be performed by direct intraoral clinical examination using a dental mirror and probe by a calibrated examiner. The outcome will be reported as the mean plaque index score per patient at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline (before retainer bonding) and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
posttreatment relapse
Post-treatment relapse will be assessed using Little's Irregularity Index, which measures the linear displacement of the anatomic contact points of the mandibular anterior teeth. Relapse will be calculated as the difference in Little's Irregularity Index between baseline (pre-retention) and 12 months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline (before retainer bonding) and at 12 months
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Pair Bond