ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07509242VitiligoUpdated Apr 3, 2026

Comparative Efficacy of hUCMSC-Secretome Delivered Via Microneedling and Intradermal Microinjection as Adjuvant Therapy to NB-UVB in Nonsegmental Vitiligo: A Quasi-Experimental Study

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome and receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection in Vitiligo, sponsored by Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-03.

Sponsored by Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to analyze the effectiveness of SM-hUCMSC secretome administered via microneedling and intradermal microinjection as adjuvant therapy to NB-UVB, compared with NB-UVB alone, in terms of repigmentation, onset of improvement, safety, patient satisfaction, and vitiligo recurrence. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Are there differences in the level of vitiligo lesion repigmentation among the secretome therapy via microneedling, intradermal microinjection, and NB-UVB phototherapy groups?
  • Are there differences in the time to onset of repigmentation among the treatment groups? What are the safety profiles and adverse events associated with each treatment modality?
  • Are there differences in patient satisfaction and quality of life after undergoing each therapy?
  • Are there differences in vitiligo recurrence rates during the follow-up period among the treatment groups?

Participants will be allocated into three groups as follows:

  • Group A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome.
  • Group B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection.
  • Group C receives NB-UVB alone. The intervention period lasts 12 weeks, with follow-up until week 24.
Read the detailed description

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of SM-hUCMSC secretome administered via microneedling and intradermal microinjection as adjuvant therapy to NB-UVB, compared with NB-UVB alone, in terms of repigmentation, onset of improvement, safety, patient satisfaction, and vitiligo recurrence.

This quasi-experimental three-group study involves patients with nonsegmental vitiligo who meet the inclusion criteria at the Precious Me Clinic, Serpong.

  • Group A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome.
  • Group B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection.
  • Group C receives NB-UVB alone. The intervention lasts for 12 weeks with follow-up until week 24. Assessments are conducted using the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI), onset of repigmentation, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient Global Assessment, adverse event monitoring, and standardized dermatologic photographic documentation. Data analysis is performed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and proportion tests as appropriate.
02

Conditions studied

  • Vitiligo

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dermatology
  • Microneedling
  • NB-UVB
  • Secretome
  • Vitiligo
03

In context

Vitiligo

343 studies on the registry are indexed under Vitiligo; 96 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 36 across 265 interventional studies indexed under Vitiligo.

Browse Vitiligo studies →

Lead sponsor

Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis of non-segmental vitiligo (established by a dermatologist).
  • Age 18-60 years.
  • Fitzpatrick skin types III-V.
  • Stable vitiligo lesions for at least 6 months (no new lesions and no lesion expansion >10% of body surface area within the past 6 months).
  • Total lesion involvement of 1-20% body surface area (BSA).
  • Willing to comply with the full course of therapy and all scheduled follow-up visits during the study.
  • Provision of written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Segmental, universal, or other vitiligo types that are difficult to standardize (e.g., lesions limited to the genital area).
  • Currently receiving or having received within the past 3 months:
  • Systemic immunomodulatory or therapy (e.g., systemic , cyclosporine, methotrexate, JAK inhibitors, etc.).

Other phototherapy modalities (e.g., PUVA, excimer laser) within the past 3 months.

  • History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring at the treatment sites.
  • Active infection at the lesion sites (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or other skin diseases that may interfere with pigmentation assessment.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • History of skin cancer, lupus, or other photosensitive disorders.
  • Severe allergy to secretome components or gel (if known).
  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., heart failure, renal failure, active systemic disease) that may compromise follow-up compliance.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A

    receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome

    Other: NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome

  • Experimental
    Group B

    receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection.

    Other: receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection

  • Experimental
    Group C

    receives NB-UVB alone.

    Drug: NB-UVB alone

Interventions

  • OtherNB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome

    Group A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome.

  • Otherreceives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection

    Group B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection

  • DrugNB-UVB alone

    Group C receives NB-UVB alone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Achieving ≥50% Repigmentation Assessed by Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)

    The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% repigmentation of target vitiligo lesions, measured using the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). Repigmentation will be calculated as the percentage reduction in depigmented area compared to baseline. Assessment will be performed by blinded dermatologists using standardized clinical evaluation and validated scoring methods.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (primary endpoint), and Week 24 (follow-up)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in VASI Score from Baseline

    The absolute change in VASI score (points) from baseline to each follow-up visit will be evaluated. VASI quantifies both the extent of vitiligo involvement and degree of depigmentation. Lower scores indicate clinical improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

  2. Time to Onset of Repigmentation

    Time (in weeks) from initiation of treatment to the first clinically observable repigmentation (≥10% repigmentation or perifollicular repigmentation), assessed by dermatologists based on clinical examination and standardized dermatological photography.

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

  3. Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score

    Quality of life will be assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. The outcome will be expressed as the change in DLQI score (points) from baseline, with lower scores indicating improved quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

  4. Patient Satisfaction Measured by Likert Scale

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied). The outcome will be reported as mean satisfaction score.

    Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

  5. Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score

    Clinical improvement as perceived by patients will be evaluated using the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) scale (0-4), where higher scores indicate greater perceived improvement.

    Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of Adverse Events

    The proportion (%) of patients experiencing local or systemic adverse events related to treatment will be recorded. Adverse events include erythema, pain, edema, infection, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and other complications. Severity will be classified as mild, moderate, or severe.

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 12

  2. Recurrence Rate of Vitiligo

    The proportion (%) of patients experiencing recurrence, defined as ≥25% loss of previously repigmented area or development of new depigmented lesions, assessed using VASI and standardized dermatological photography.

    Time frame: Week 24

  3. Repigmentation Assessed by Standardized Dermatological Photography

    Repigmentation will be evaluated using standardized dermatological photography with controlled lighting, positioning, and calibration. Images will be assessed by blinded dermatologists to estimate percentage of repigmentation (%), ensuring objective visual documentation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07509242
Lead sponsor
Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM
Responsible party
Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM (Clinical officer, Tarumanagara University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 3, 2026
Start date
Mar 18, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 18, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 18, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 3, 2026

Study contacts

Sukmawati Tansil Tan, Dr.
Contact
sukmawati@fk.untar.ac.id
+6287871111318
Yohanes Firmansyah, MD
Contact
yohanes@fk.untar.ac.id
+6281297934375
Sukmawati Tansil Tan
principal investigator · Tarumanagara University
Yohanes Firmansyah
study director · Universitas Tarumanagara
Michael Jansen Politan
study chair · Precious Me Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion