ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07504185Updated Mar 31, 2026

Physiotherapy After Emergency Laparotomy in the Elderly

An interventional study of Experimental (Structured postoperative physiotherapy) and Standard postoperative care in Emergency Abdominal Surgery, sponsored by University of Cyprus. Recruiting at 1 site in Cyprus. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by University of Cyprus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2025, registered Feb 2026).
  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Emergency laparotomy is associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality. This risk is particularly high among elderly patients, who often present with reduced physiological reserve, frailty, and multimorbidity.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a structured postoperative physiotherapy program in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing emergency laparotomy. The study will assess its impact on functional recovery and clinical outcomes.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial evaluating a structured postoperative physiotherapy program in older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy. Participants aged ≥65 years who undergo an index emergency laparotomy will be enrolled at Nicosia General Hospital (Cyprus) and the University Hospital of Heraklion (Greece) and randomized 1:1 to either (a) a standardized, progressive 5-day postoperative physiotherapy package (supervised early mobilization with progressive targets, coached breathing/airway clearance exercises, and supported self-practice with family/caregiver engagement) or (b) usual postoperative care as delivered in routine practice.

Randomization will occur after surgery once the participant is clinically stable on the surgical ward (including after ICU step-down when applicable), using a computer-generated allocation sequence. Functional recovery will be assessed using validated measures at prespecified time points during the index hospitalization and at follow-up (30 and 90 days). Key secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, postoperative pulmonary complications, length of stay, mortality, and health-related quality of life. Analyses will compare groups according to the intention-to-treat principle.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emergency Abdominal Surgery

Keywords

  • postoperative recovery, elderly, emergency abdominal surgery
  • Physiotherapy intervention
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Cyprus is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥ 65 years
  • Undergoing emergency laparotomy with or without stoma creation (adhesiolysis, right hemicolectomy, total colectomy, Hartmann's procedure, cholecystectomy, abscess drainage).

Able to provide or have a legally authorized representative provide consent.

Able to maintain an upright standing position for at least one minute with minimal or no assistance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Dementia (Abbreviated Mental Test Score \< 6)
  • Pre-existing severe disabilities affecting mobility
  • Patients with to physiotherapy (e.g., severe cardiopulmonary instability)
  • Patients transferred postoperatively from other hospitals
  • Patients who underwent no intervention during laparotomy (negative laparotomies)
  • Patients undergoing palliative procedures and at the end of life
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1: Intervention - 5-Day Protocol

    Participants will receive a structured five-day postoperative physiotherapy program including progressively increasing mobilization, supervised therapeutic exercises, and respiratory training every two hours. A booklet with detailed exercise instructions and a daily log for recording repetitions will be provided. A family member will be informed to support adherence. Nutritional risk will be assessed and its association with functional recovery will be evaluated

    Behavioral: Experimental (Structured postoperative physiotherapy)

  • Other
    Arm 2: Standard care

    Participants in the control group will receive standard postoperative physiotherapy according to usual hospital practice. This includes general mobilization without a structured or progressively increasing protocol. Instruction in deep breathing exercises and voluntary coughing will be provided only once on the first postoperative day, without further supervision or reinforcement. No lower limb strengthening or muscle pump exercises will be implemented, and no exercise booklet, daily monitoring, or structured adherence tracking will be provided.

    Other: Standard postoperative care

Interventions

  • BehavioralExperimental (Structured postoperative physiotherapy)

    A structured five-day postoperative physiotherapy program including progressively increasing mobilization, supervised therapeutic exercises, and respiratory training every two hours. Participants will receive an exercise booklet and daily log for monitoring adherence.

    Also known as: Treatment Group

  • OtherStandard postoperative care

    Standard postoperative physiotherapy according to usual hospital practice, including general mobilization and basic breathing instruction without structured progression or monitoring.

    Also known as: Controll Group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Status

    Functional independence measured with the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL), total score 0-100. Higher scores indicate better function/greater independence. Scores will be compared with baseline (preoperative functional level) and reassessed at follow-up (At hospital discharge, and at 30 and 90 days after discharge).

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (6-15 days postoperatively on average), and at 30 and 90 days after discharge.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Handgrip strength (dynamometry),

    Muscle strength will be assessed using a handgrip dynamometer. The participant will be seated, with the elbow of the dominant hand supported on a stable surface at a 90° angle. The participant will then be instructed to squeeze the dynamometer handle as forcefully as possible. The test will be repeated three (3) times, and the highest value recorded will be used for analysis. Measurements of \<20 kg for women and \<30 kg for men will be considered indicative of reduced muscle strength.

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (6-15 days postoperatively on average)

  2. sit-to-stand performance,

    Participants attempt to stand from a 47-cm chair without using their arms, completing as many repetitions as possible within 30 seconds. Performance \<8 repetitions indicates reduced functional ability.

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (6-15 days postoperatively on average).

  3. frailty (mFI-11),

    Frailty assessed with the 11-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-11). The score can be reported as a count (0-11) or as a proportion (0.00-1.00) / percentage (0-100%). Higher scores indicate greater frailty and worse prognosis

    Time frame: Baseline: within 24 hours of hospital admission (or, if not feasible, within 24 hours of arrival to the surgical ward postoperatively), prior to randomization

  4. nutritional risk (MUST),

    Nutritional risk assessed with the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), total score 0-6. Higher scores indicate higher risk of malnutrition (0=low, 1=medium, ≥2=high)

    Time frame: Baseline: within 24 hours of hospital admission (or, if not feasible, within 24 hours of arrival to the surgical ward postoperatively), prior to randomization

  5. postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo),

    A 5-grade classification system used in surgery to standardize the reporting of postoperative complications based on the severity of the intervention required to treat them.

    Time frame: From postoperative day 1 through hospital discharge (6-15 days postoperatively average)

  6. Respiratory complications (Melbourne Score)

    The Melbourne Group Scale (MGS) was developed by physiotherapists as an objective tool for the diagnosis of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). It comprises eight standardized clinical criteria, including abnormal breath sounds on auscultation, increased sputum production, fever, hypoxaemia, chest imaging findings consistent with atelectasis or consolidation, elevated white blood cell count, physician diagnosis of pneumonia, and prolonged requirement for high oxygen supplementation. A postoperative pulmonary complication is diagnosed when four (4) or more of these eight criteria are present within a 24-hour period.

    Time frame: From postoperative day 1 through hospital discharge (6-15 days postoperatively average)

  7. Hospital length of stay,

    Number of days in Hospital

    Time frame: From admission to hospital discharge (6-15 days postoperatively average)

  8. 30-day mortality

    Living stadus in 30 Days after discharge

    Time frame: 30 Days after discharge

  9. health-related quality of life (EQ-5D at 30 and 90 days)

    The EQ-5D, developed by the EuroQol Group, is a widely validated measure of health-related quality of life. It includes five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each with five severity levels, and a visual analogue scale (0-100) for global health. Responses produce a five-digit health state code (e.g., 11111 = best health). A validated Greek version is available.

    Time frame: The tool will be used at 30 and 90 days after discharge via telephone follow-up.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2. PubMed 19638912 ↗
  • Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. PubMed 3558716 ↗
  • Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, Baptista G, Barazzoni R, Blaauw R, Coats A, Crivelli A, Evans DC, Gramlich L, Fuchs-Tarlovsky V, Keller H, Llido L, Malone A, Mogensen KM, Morley JE, Muscaritoli M, Nyulasi I, Pirlich M, Pisprasert V, de van der Schueren MAE, Siltharm S, Singer P, Tappenden K, Velasco N, Waitzberg D, Yamwong P, Yu J, Van Gossum A, Compher C; GLIM Core Leadership Committee; GLIM Working Group. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition - A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Sep 3. PubMed 30181091 ↗
  • Farhat JS, Velanovich V, Falvo AJ, Horst HM, Swartz A, Patton JH Jr, Rubinfeld IS. Are the frail destined to fail? Frailty index as predictor of surgical morbidity and mortality in the elderly. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1526-30; discussion 1530-1. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182542fab. PubMed 22695416 ↗
  • Mehmet H, Yang AWH, Robinson SR. Measurement of hand grip strength in the elderly: A scoping review with recommendations. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Jan;24(1):235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 May 24. PubMed 31987550 ↗
  • de Melo TA, Silva Guimaraes F, Lapa E Silva JR. The five times sit-to-stand test: safety, validity and reliability with critical care survivors's at ICU discharge. Arch Physiother. 2022 Dec 18;13(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40945-022-00156-z. PubMed 36597159 ↗
  • Tafiadis D, Ziavra N, Prentza A, Siafaka V, Zarokanellou V, Voniati L, Konitsiotis S. Validation of the Greek version of the Abbreviated Mental Test Score: Preliminary findings for cognitively impaired patients of different etiology. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Sep-Oct;29(5):1003-1014. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1835915. Epub 2020 Oct 29. PubMed 33119404 ↗
  • Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, Yfantopoulos J, Dimitrakaki C, Tountas Y. Validity of the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument in a Greek general population. Value Health. 2008 Dec;11(7):1162-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00356.x. Epub 2008 May 16. PubMed 18489492 ↗
  • Ferfeli S, Galanos A, Dontas IA, Triantafyllou A, Triantafyllopoulos IK, Chronopoulos E. Reliability and validity of the Greek adaptation of the Modified Barthel Index in neurorehabilitation patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Feb;60(1):44-54. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08056-5. Epub 2023 Oct 25. PubMed 37877957 ↗
  • Hanekom SD, Brooks D, Denehy L, Fagevik-Olsen M, Hardcastle TC, Manie S, Louw Q. Reaching consensus on the physiotherapeutic management of patients following upper abdominal surgery: a pragmatic approach to interpret equivocal evidence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Feb 6;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-5. PubMed 22309427 ↗
  • Boden I, Sullivan K, Hackett C, Winzer B, Lane R, McKinnon M, Robertson I. ICEAGE (Incidence of Complications following Emergency Abdominal surgery: Get Exercising): study protocol of a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial testing physiotherapy for the prevention of complications and improved physical recovery after emergency abdominal surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Jul 3;13:29. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0189-y. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29988707 ↗
  • Grams ST, Ono LM, Noronha MA, Schivinski CI, Paulin E. Breathing exercises in upper abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012 Sep-Oct;16(5):345-53. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000052. Epub 2012 Oct 9. PubMed 23060237 ↗
  • Boden I. Physiotherapy management of major abdominal surgery. J Physiother. 2024 Jul;70(3):170-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jun 19. No abstract available. PubMed 38902197 ↗
  • Wender M, Godlewski A, Szczech J. Oligodendroglia of the ageing human brain. Karyometric and cytophotometric studies. Neuropatol Pol. 1987;25(4):461-72. No abstract available. PubMed 3454879 ↗
  • Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, Ko CY, Esnaola NF; American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; American Geriatrics Society. Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Oct;215(4):453-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Aug 21. No abstract available. PubMed 22917646 ↗
  • Tolstrup MB, Watt SK, Gogenur I. Morbidity and mortality rates after emergency abdominal surgery: an analysis of 4346 patients scheduled for emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Jun;402(4):615-623. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1493-1. Epub 2016 Aug 9. PubMed 27502400 ↗
  • Lasithiotakis K, Kritsotakis EI, Kokkinakis S, Petra G, Paterakis K, Karali GA, Malikides V, Anastasiadis CS, Zoras O, Drakos N, Kehagias I, Kehagias D, Gouvas N, Kokkinos G, Pozotou I, Papatheodorou P, Frantzeskou K, Schizas D, Syllaios A, Palios IM, Nastos K, Perdikaris M, Michalopoulos NV, Margaris I, Lolis E, Dimopoulou G, Panagiotou D, Nikolaou V, Glantzounis GK, Pappas-Gogos G, Tepelenis K, Zacharioudakis G, Tsaramanidis S, Patsarikas I, Stylianidis G, Giannos G, Karanikas M, Kofina K, Markou M, Chrysos E. The Hellenic Emergency Laparotomy Study (HELAS): A Prospective Multicentre Study on the Outcomes of Emergency Laparotomy in Greece. World J Surg. 2023 Jan;47(1):130-139. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06723-6. Epub 2022 Sep 15. PubMed 36109368 ↗
  • Kabir MF, Jahan S, Hossain MZ, Chakrovorty SK, Sarker AH, Hossain MA, et al. Effect of chest physiotherapy along with early mobility after abdominal surgery. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2021 Feb 9;3(1):150-6.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be publicly available due to privacy and confidentiality considerations and institutional data protection policies.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 29 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 18, 2026
First posted
Mar 31, 2026
StartActual
Jul 13, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2028
Last update
Mar 31, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07504185
Lead sponsor
University of Cyprus
Collaborators
Nicosia General Hospital, University of Crete
Responsible party
Polyxeni Michael Vargiamidou (Principal Investigator, University of Cyprus) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 31, 2026
Start date
Jul 13, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Study contacts

Polyxeni Michael Vargiamidou, PT
Contact
michael-vargiamidou.p@ucy.ac.cy
+35799476613
Dr. Nikolaos Gouvas, M.D, Ph.D
Contact
gouvas.nikolaos@ucy.ac.cy
+35799821132
Konstantinos G. Lasithiotakis, M.D., Ph.D
study director · Medical School, University of Crete

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion