An interventional study of Longitudinal incision and Complete resection in Trigger Digit and Trigger Finger, sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM). Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.
Sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Trigger finger is a pathology of the flexor tendons caused by inflammation of the tendon or its sheath, leading to pain, nodules, fibrosis, and limited mobility. Surgical treatment aims to release the space at the level of the A1 pulley, either through longitudinal opening (the standard technique, but associated with recurrence rates of approximately 7.7%) or through complete resection, an emerging approach that may reduce recurrences and the need for reoperations. However, comparative data remain limited, justifying further investigation. This project therefore aims to compare these two surgical techniques to determine which one results in the lowest recurrence rate and to assess their functional outcomes (pain, range of motion). The primary hypothesis is that A1 pulley resection reduces recurrences after one year, while the secondary hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in postoperative pain or mobility.
Trigger finger can affect any finger of the hand, but most commonly involves the third and fourth digits. Trigger finger is a disorder of the flexor tendons, which are responsible for finger flexion. The condition occurs when inflammation develops either in the tendon or in its sheath. The exact cause of this inflammation is often difficult to determine, but it may result from a previous injury or repetitive finger use. If the inflammation is not treated, the finger may loose mobility in flexion or become locked in a flexed position, causing significant pain. Some individuals develop nodules at the base of the affected fingers, while in others the sheath becomes fibrotic or narrowed, reflecting the formation of scar tissue. This leads to friction between the tendon and the A1 pulley (a portion of the sheath) during finger movement, causing pain and impaired mobility.
Longitudinal opening of the A1 pulley and complete A1 pulley resection are two surgical procedures described for the treatment of trigger finger. In both cases, the goal of surgery is to create more space so that the inflamed tendon can glide smoothly within the tendon sheath without friction. Longitudinal opening consists of making a longitudinal incision in the A1 pulley with a scalpel. Resection, or excision, involves completely removing the A1 pulley.
Longitudinal opening of the A1 pulley is the current standard of care performed by most surgeons for trigger fingers that do not respond to conservative measures. Reported success rates range from 90% to 100% across patient populations. However, the literature suggests that recurrence after longitudinal release is one of the main adverse outcomes, with a documented rate of approximately 7.7% according to several studies. Conversely, complete A1 pulley excision is an innovative technique that appears promising. A retrospective study by Porter et al. suggested a potential advantage of this approach, including reduced need for postoperative injections and fewer revision surgeries.These findings indicate a possible benefit of complete resection in preventing recurrence, particularly in diabetic patients. However, as a retrospective study, it carries important methodological limitations. A randomized clinical trial is currently underway to more rigorously evaluate this approach and validate its effectiveness on a larger scale, but no data are yet available. In this context, additional data from diverse clinical settings are essential.
The objective of this clinical trial is to compare longitudinal opening of the A1 pulley with complete A1 pulley resection in patients with at least one trigger finger. This will help confirm the findings of Porter et al.'s retrospective study while contributing to external validation of the technique. The primary aim is to determine which surgical technique results in the lowest recurrence rate. The secondary aim is to compare functional outcomes such as pain and range of motion.
The primary hypothesis is that A1 pulley resection will lead to fewer trigger finger recurrences after one year compared with longitudinal opening of the A1 pulley. The secondary hypothesis is that there will be no significant difference in postoperative pain or finger mobility between the two techniques.
93 studies on the registry are indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder; 22 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 236 is above the median of 66 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder.
Browse Trigger Finger Disorder studies →Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) is the lead sponsor of 376 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Complete resection
Procedure: Complete resection
Longitudinal incision
Procedure: Longitudinal incision
A longitudinal incision of the A1 pulley performed to open the pulley, thereby reducing the pressure on the inflamed tendon and facilitating its gliding during finger movements.
Fully removing the pulley in order to eliminate friction between the tendon and its fibrous band
Compare trigger finger recurrences between longitudinal A1 pulley release surgery and complete A1 pulley resection surgery
The diagnostic method will be clinical evaluation. It will be based on the patient's clinical history, including the presence of a painful 'click' during finger movement, a finger that occasionally locks in flexion, pain over the A1 pulley, and/or a palpable nodule at the level of the A1 pulley. The primary outcome will be assessed by an independent, blinded evaluator who did not participate in the surgery and is unaware of the patient's allocation. If necessary, the evaluator will verify the limitation by placing the dorsal surface of the patient's hand on the table and asking the patient to make a fist (flexion) and then open the hand (extension): the inability of the affected finger to remain in a flexed position will confirm the diagnosis. No score, tool, or scale is required for diagnosis, as recurrence is a binary variable that is either present or absent.
Time frame: One year after surgery
Persistence of pain to the operated finger
Pain will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which consists of a 10-cm linear paper scale with a horizontal line labeled only at both ends: '0 = no pain' and '10 = worst imaginable pain.' After the patient marks their pain level by placing a point on the line, the distance in millimeters will be measured with a ruler by the blinded evaluator. All evaluators will follow the same procedure to ensure inter-observer consistency."
Time frame: 1 week, 4 weeks and one year after surgery
Range of motion of the operated finger
The measurement tool for range of motion will be a goniometer, an instrument that allows precise measurement of the finger's flexion and extension angles.
Time frame: 1 week, 4 weeks and one year after surgery
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Apr 2026; primary completion for Apr 2029, 36 months later.
Of 34 interventional studies with no phase under Trigger Finger Disorder, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 36 months is above that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) →