CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07484711Updated Mar 20, 2026

F.I.R.E.- Fighters With Focus, Intention, Regulation and Engagement

An interventional study of FIRE in Firefighters' Mental Health, sponsored by University of Coimbra. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-20.

Sponsored by University of Coimbra · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
53
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Firefighters are routinely exposed to potentially traumatic events, making them vulnerable to debilitating mental health problems. Consequently, promoting well-being and the ability to respond effectively and safely to work demands are vital. The FIRE is an innovative mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and compassion-based manualized intervention encompassing eight weekly group sessions delivered at Fire Stations. A preliminary version of this program will be refined based on qualitative inputs from structured interviews with firefighters and emergency/civil protection sector stakeholders. The FIRE feasibility dimensions of adaptation, acceptability, implementation, practicality, integration, and limited efficacy will be evaluated in a two-arm, 1:1, non-blinded randomised controlled trial. The extent to which the FIRE contributes to the promotion of well-being and the decrease of psychopathological symptoms, and the causal theory underlying FIRE, will be explored through an examination of potential mechanisms of change.

Read the detailed description

The FIRE is an innovative mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and compassion-based manualised intervention, encompassing 8-weekly group sessions delivered at Fire Stations. The FIRE implementation will occur outside the Charlie phase (fire critical season, from May to October), controlling for the potential seasonality impact on results. Two clinical psychologists with mindfulness, ACT, and compassion training will facilitate the FIRE sessions. Weekly gentle reminders will be sent to motivate participants to practice the between-sessions exercises.

The current project aims to conduct a feasibility study, including the dimensions of adaptation, acceptability, implementation, practicality, integration, and limited efficacy. Regarding limited efficacy, it is hypothesised that participants in the experimental group (EG-FIRE) will reveal significant decreases in firefighters' psychopathological symptoms (depression, anxiety, PTSD) and will present higher levels of well-being, feelings of belonging, acceptance, and feelings of warmth from colleagues, and attention when compared to participants in the waiting-list control group (CG-WL). It is also hypothesised that these improvements will persist over a 3-month follow-up period.

The ANEPC will invite Fire Stations in the centre region of Portugal to participate. The FIRE will be presented at each Fire Station enrolled in the study during an informative session, and a leaflet will also be distributed. Interested firefighters will be asked to register, assess eligibility, and give informed consent. Consenting participants will be randomly allocated to: a) experimental group-EG-FIRE receiving the intervention; b) wait-list control group-WL-CG.

All ethical requirements for research with humans will be guaranteed. Participants will complete online standardised self-report measures at pre-intervention (M0), post-intervention (M1), and 3-month follow-up (M2). At M1, the EG-FIRE will complete a feasibility criteria questionnaire. Limited efficacy will be assessed using Intention-to-Treat and per-protocol analyses. Two-way mixed ANOVAs and MANOVAs will be computed on the study outcomes, with Group (EG-FIRE, WL-CG) as the between-subject variable and Time (M0, M1) as the within-subject factor. Repeated ANOVAs and MANOVAS with Time (M1, M2) as the within-subject factor will be computed to investigate changes in outcomes from M1 to M2 and at the 3-month follow-up in the EG-FIRE. Effect sizes will be analysed.

To limit attrition rates, risks, and barriers to the FIRE implementation (interference with firefighters' assignments), it will be proposed that sessions be scheduled to avoid conflicts with participants' work shifts, held at the Fire Station (to avoid participants' burden). It will be negotiated to include the FIRE sessions in the national training hours plan for EG-FIRE participants. To ensure the program's rigorous implementation, weekly meetings will be held with the project supervisors.

The FIRE is expected to be a feasible program that will advance, disseminate, and facilitate knowledge transfer, providing scientific evidence to inform mental health practices for the emergency and civil protection sectors. It is expected to promote well-being, feelings of connectedness, belonging, warmth, acceptance, and attention, and decrease firefighters' psychopathological symptoms. Mental health benefits are expected to result from improvements in mindfulness, psychological flexibility, and compassion skills, and from decreases in rumination, and to be sustained over a 3-month follow-up. Two self-report measures adapted to the firefighters' setting will be available, contributing to further investigate psychological aspects in this population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Firefighters' Mental Health

Keywords

  • Psychological Intervention
  • Firefighters
  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
  • Compassion
  • Feasibility study
  • Mindfulness
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Coimbra is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65
  • Being a volunteer firefighter

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently undergoing any form of psychiatric/psychological intervention (self-reported)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
53 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental FIRE Group

    Participants in the experimental group will receive the FIRE programme delivered at Fire Stations. Participants will complete online standardised self-report measures, pre-(M0), post-intervention (M1) and 3-months follow-up (M2). At M1, the experimental FIRE group will complete a feasibility criteria questionnaire.

    Behavioral: FIRE

  • No intervention
    Wait-list Control Group

    Participants in the wait-list control group will complete online standardised self-report measures, pre-(M0), post-intervention (M1) and 3-months follow-up (M2). The wait-list control group participants will be offered the opportunity to receive the FIRE programme after the study.

Interventions

  • BehavioralFIRE

    The FIRE will include 8-weekly group sessions (10-15 participants per group; 90-minutes duration) delivered at Fire Stations. The FIRE implementation will occur outside the charlie phase (fire critical season, from May to October), controlling for the potential seasonality impact on results. Two clinical psychologists with mindfulness, ACT and compassion training will facilitate the FIRE sessions. Weekly gentle reminders will be sent to motivating participants to practice the between-sessions exercises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Well-being

    Measured by the World Health Organization Well-Being Index 5 (WHO-5). The total raw score, ranging from 0 to 25, is multiplied by 4 to give the final score, with 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 3-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depression

    Measured with the depression subscale of the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4). The subscale scores range between 0 and 6. Scores equal or higher than 3 are a reasonable cut-off point for detecting possible cases of depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 3-month follow-up

  2. Anxiety

    Measured with the anxiety subscale of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). The subscale scores range between 0 and 6. Scores equal to or higher than 3 are a reasonable cut-off point for detecting possible cases of anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 3-month follow-up

  3. PTSD

    Measured with the PTSD Checklist-5. The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater severity of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 3-month follow-up

  4. Attention

    Measured with the Toulose Piéron Cancellation Test. Performance is assessed based on the number of correctly cancelled stimuli, errors of omission and commission, and indices of attention and concentration, with higher scores indicating better attentional performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  5. Mindfulness

    Measured with the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ; 18-item version). The total score for this scale ranges from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness skills.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 3-month follow-up

  6. Compassion

    Measured with the Self-Compassion Scale - short form (SCS-SF). The total score for this scale ranges from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater self-compassion.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 3-month follow-up

  7. Psychological Flexibility

    Measured with the Psy-Flex. The total score for this scale ranges from 5 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater psychological flexibility.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 3-month follow-up

  8. Social Safeness

    Measured with the Social Safeness and Pleasure Scale - Firefighters (SSPS-F). The total score ranges from 11 to 55, with higher scores indicating greater perceived social safeness and pleasure.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 3-month follow-up

Other outcomes

  1. Feasibility criteria questionnaire - Acceptability

    Measured through the feasibility criteria questionnaire (to be developed by the researchers). It will comprise questions addressing overall FIRE satisfaction, perceived usefulness of each session and experiential exercises and willingness to recommend the FIRE to peers.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Feasibility criteria questionnaire - Demand

    Measured through the feasibility criteria questionnaire (to be developed by the researchers). This dimension will focus on program adherence (e.g., number of participants, percentage of sessions completed).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Feasibility criteria questionnaire - Implementation

    Measured through the feasibility criteria questionnaire (to be developed by the researchers). Barriers and facilitators of engagement will be examined.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Feasibility criteria questionnaire - Practicality

    Measured through the feasibility criteria questionnaire (to be developed by the researchers). This dimension will assess the practicality of delivering the intervention within fire stations, including the availability of required resources (e.g., space, materials).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Feasibility criteria questionnaire - Adaptation

    Measured through the feasibility criteria questionnaire (to be developed by the researchers). This dimension will assess the need for, and type of adaptations required to deliver the intervention in fire stations (e.g., modifications to content, format, duration, or delivery procedures to fit the operational context).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  6. Feasibility criteria questionnaire - Integration

    Measured through the feasibility criteria questionnaire (to be developed by the researchers). The integration dimension will be defined as how participant firefighters use the FIRE skills in everyday life and their willingness to continue to do so in the future.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  7. Feasibility criteria questionnaire - Expansion

    Measured through the feasibility criteria questionnaire (to be developed by the researchers). This dimension will assess the potential for expanding the intervention.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  8. Limited Efficacy

    Measured through standardised self-report measures previously mentioned. Limited efficacy will correspond to the effect size estimations of changes in primary and secondary self-reported outcomes in the FIRE Group vs the Wait-list Control Group.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra
    Coimbra, 3000-115, Portugal
    • Soraia Moniz · Contact · soraia-moniz@live.com.pt · +351912155586
    • Soraia Moniz, MSc · Principal investigator
    • Ana Galhardo, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Cláudia Ferreira, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07484711
Lead sponsor
University of Coimbra
Responsible party
Soraia Moniz (Principal Investigator, University of Coimbra) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 20, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 20, 2026

Study contacts

Soraia Moniz
Contact
soraia-moniz@live.com.pt
+351912155586

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion