CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07480798Updated Mar 30, 2026

Rock-Paper-Scissors-OK in Nerve Examination

An interventional study of Conventional Neurological Examination and Preoperative video-based training module in Supracondylar Humerus Fractures and Nerve Examination, sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 4 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.

Sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2024, registered Mar 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients presenting to the Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital with supracondylar humerus (elbow) fractures will initially undergo closed reduction. Following the reduction procedure, radiographic imaging will be obtained and patients will be re-evaluated. If surgical intervention is deemed necessary based on this assessment, operative treatment will be recommended.

The surgical technique will consist of closed reduction followed by percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. In cases where adequate fracture reduction cannot be achieved by closed means, open reduction will be performed through an anterior incision. In these patients, K-wires will again be inserted percutaneously.

Fixation will be achieved using one medial (ulnar side) and two lateral K-wires. Postoperatively, a neurological examination will be performed. In patients who are shown a video and taught the game beforehand, neurological assessment will be conducted using the "rock-paper-scissors" game. In other patients, the examination will be performed by demonstrating and requesting specific hand movements.

If ulnar nerve deficit is detected during postoperative neurological evaluation, the medial K-wire will be removed. The time interval between the patient's emergence from anesthesia and the neurological examination will be recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Supracondylar Humerus Fractures
  • Nerve Examination

Keywords

  • Supracondylar humerus fracture
  • Nerve examination
  • Rock-Paper-Scissors-Ok
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent is the lead sponsor of 424 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 4 to 10 years
  • Underwent surgical treatment for supracondylar humerus fracture
  • Willing to participate (assent/parental consent as applicable)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive inability to understand or perform the rock-paper-scissors-OK movements
  • Declined participation (patient and/or parent/guardian refusal, as applicable)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Smartphone-Assisted Neurological Examination

    Participants undergo neurological examination using a smartphone-assisted application (preoperatively and postoperatively). Examination duration and patient satisfaction are recorded.

    Other: Preoperative video-based training module

  • Other
    Conventional Neurological Examination

    Participants undergo neurological examination using conventional bedside clinical assessment methods (preoperatively and postoperatively). Examination duration and patient satisfaction are recorded.

    Other: Conventional Neurological Examination

Interventions

  • OtherConventional Neurological Examination

    Standard neurological examination performed by the clinician using conventional bedside assessment.

  • OtherPreoperative video-based training module

    Participants in the smartphone-assisted group viewed a single standardized preoperative video-based training module delivered via YouTube (duration: 2 minutes 34 seconds).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative neurological examination duration (minutes)

    Time required to complete the neurological examination postoperatively, recorded in minutes.

    Time frame: Immediately postoperatively after awakening in the recovery room

Secondary outcomes

  1. Preoperative neurological deficit (yes/no)

    Presence of neurological deficit on examination (radial, ulnar, median, and anterior interosseous nerve function). Recorded as yes/no (frequency, %).

    Time frame: Preoperatively in the emergency department (before surgery)

  2. Preoperative neurological examination duration (minutes)

    Time required to complete the neurological examination preoperatively, recorded in minutes.

    Time frame: Preoperatively in the emergency department (before surgery)

  3. Patient/parent satisfaction: Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (Child HCAHPS)

    Satisfaction was measured with the Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (Child HCAHPS). Domain scores were calculated as mean values on a 1-4 Likert scale (min=1, max=4); higher scores indicate better satisfaction/better care experience.

    Time frame: On the day the patients is discharged after surgery (typically the 2nd or 3rd day after the operation)

  4. Postoperative neurological deficit (yes/no)

    Presence of neurological deficit on examination (radial, ulnar, median, and anterior interosseous nerve function). Recorded as yes/no (frequency, %).

    Time frame: Immediately postoperatively after awakening in the recovery room

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
    Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Spinner M. The anterior interosseous-nerve syndrome, with special attention to its variations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Jan;52(1):84-94. No abstract available. PubMed 5411776 ↗
  • Davidson AW. Rock-paper-scissors. Injury. 2003 Jan;34(1):61-3. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00102-x. PubMed 12531378 ↗
  • Toomey SL, Zaslavsky AM, Elliott MN, Gallagher PM, Fowler FJ Jr, Klein DJ, Shulman S, Ratner J, McGovern C, LeBlanc JL, Schuster MA. The Development of a Pediatric Inpatient Experience of Care Measure: Child HCAHPS. Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):360-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0966. Epub 2015 Jul 20. PubMed 26195542 ↗
  • Aydin T, Inci F, Kilic M, Yigit N, Kahve Y, Ceyhan E. Rock-paper-scissors-OK game for neurological examination in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Child Orthop. 2026 Jul 10:18632521261466900. doi: 10.1177/18632521261466900. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42438747 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07480798
Lead sponsor
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 18, 2026
Start date
Mar 13, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 18, 2025
Completion
May 22, 2025
Last update
Mar 30, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion