CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07480499Updated Mar 18, 2026

Erector Spinae Plane Versus Quadratus Lumborum Blocks for Pain Management After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

An interventional study of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) in Post Operative Analgesia, sponsored by Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Combined Military Hospital Muzaffarabad. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 35 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Combined Military Hospital Muzaffarabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

TAH, being a large scale gynaecological operation, is a construction bound to cause serious postoperative pain to the patient in that the procedure will inevitably entail massive tissue dissection. Management of this postoperative pain is of utmost significance because poor analgesia may lead to delayed mobilization of the patient, long duration of hospitalization and also general increase in the morbidity of postoperative period. Traditionally, in these facilities, opioid analgesics are the most common and the most popular means of controlling postoperative pain. Nevertheless, the varied and pervasive use of opioids is largely constrained by its well-reported, dose-dependent systemic adverse effects. Nausea, vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression are complications that severely degrade the recovery process of the patient and reduce his or her satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited in the trial after getting approval from the Hospital Ethical Review Committee and REU CPSP. Demographic information such as age, height, weight, body mass index as well as the functional classification (ASA) was documented on a pre-made proforma. Patients were randomized into two groups using a computer-generated randomisation process.

Group A: Received an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the T9-T10 level using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine.

Group B: Received an ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine.

A qualified anaesthesiologist performed each block in aseptic settings prior to surgery. Standardised general anaesthesia was administered to each patient. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to quantify pain at rest and on coughing at 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. Patents with VAS score more than 4, were given rescue analgesia and the cumulative amount of analgesics used in the first 24 hours as well as the time of the first rescue analgesia were recorded. Patient satisfaction with pain treatment as well as adverse effects such nausea, vomiting, and hypotension were tracked for a duration of 24 hours after the surgery

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Operative Analgesia

Keywords

  • post operative analgesia,
  • erector spinae plane block
  • Quadratus Lumborum Blocks
  • Abdominal Hysterectomy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Combined Military Hospital Muzaffarabad as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 35-60 years. ASA physical status I or II. Elective Total Abdominal Hysterectomy under General Anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Allergy with local anesthetics. Infection in the injection site. Coagulopathy or anticoagulant use. Morbid obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m²).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A

    Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block

  • Active comparator
    Group B

    Procedure: Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB)

Interventions

  • ProcedureErector Spinae Plane Block

    Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the T9-T10 level using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine.

  • ProcedureQuadratus Lumborum Block (QLB)

    Ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post Operative Pain

    Visual Analogue Score a one-dimensional indicator of pain severity. It is made up of a horizontal line that is 10 cm (100 mm) long and has two end points marked "No Pain" (0) and "Worst Possible Pain" (10). On the line, the patient marks the point that most accurately depicts their level of discomfort at 2,4,6,18 \& 24 hours post operatively.

    Time frame: 24 Hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first Rescue Analgesia

    When a patient's pain score surpasses a certain threshold (e.g., VAS \> 4), additional analgesic medication is administered when the primary anaesthetic approach is unable to give sufficient pain relief and the time will be calculated in hours.

    Time frame: 24 Hourse

  2. Cumulative Opioid consumption

    The total amount of opioid medicine needed by the patient over the course of the first 24 hours following surgery in order to sustain sufficient analgesia. This is frequently computed as the Morphine Equivalent Dose (mg) and standardised.

    Time frame: 24 Hours

  3. Adverse effects

    Unwanted and unpleasant effects like nausea, vomiting during 24 hours post operatively

    Time frame: 24 Hours

  4. Patient Satisfaction

    A conventional 5-point Likert scale that ranges from "Very Dissatisfied" to "Very Satisfied" is usually used to gauge the patient's subjective assessment of the level of pain care they got during 24 hours duration post-operatively

    Time frame: 24 Hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • SKBZN CMH Muzaffarabad
    Muzaffarabad, Azad Kashmir 13100, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Korgvee A, Junttila E, Koskinen H, Huhtala H, Kalliomaki ML. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Feb 1;38(2):115-129. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001368. PubMed 33186305 ↗
  • Adhikary SD, Pruett A, Forero M, Thiruvenkatarajan V. Erector spinae plane block versusquadratus lumborum block: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(10):854-863.
  • Chavan R, Goklani A, Chavan G, Mali V. Comparison of anterior quadratus lumborum block versus lumbar erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled study. Pain Med. 2025;26(1):12-18
  • Baran O, Sahin A, Arar C. Comparative efficacy of erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum blocks in managing postoperative pain for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 25;103(43):e40313. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040313. PubMed 39470511 ↗
  • Abdelaziz TSA, Abdou K, Salem M. Erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized comparative study. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2024;28(2):333-340.
  • Zewdu D, Tantu T, Eanga S, Tilahun T. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 29;11:1399253. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1399253. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39135713 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07480499
Lead sponsor
Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Combined Military Hospital Muzaffarabad
Responsible party
Hamid Altaf (Resident, Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Combined Military Hospital Muzaffarabad) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 18, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Hamid Altaf Altaf
Contact
hamidaltaf331@gmail.com
+92 341 4764956

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion