An interventional study of Drop Jump Protocol in Physical Performance Parameters, sponsored by University Institute of Maia. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-16.
Sponsored by University Institute of Maia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) is a fundamental mechanism in explosive human movement, enabling musculotendinous units to store and release elastic energy, thereby allowing the body to produce higher forces and velocities with greater mechanical efficiency. Movements such as sprinting, jumping, hopping, and sudden changes of direction, which depend on rapid force application, are supported by an effective SSC. Because of this, identifying a simple and interpretable index of SSC function has long been a priority in both research and applied sport settings.
The Reactive Strength Index (RSI), most commonly defined as the ratio of jump height to ground contact time, has become the most widely used metric for quantifying SSC performance. However, this ratio presents notable methodological limitations: it combines variables of incompatible dimensions and is insensitive to drop height, thereby ignoring the eccentric load imposed on the musculotendinous system. The Dynamic Rebound Index (DRI), recently proposed as a dimensionless and mechanically grounded alternative, is calculated as DRI = (box height + jump height) / (9.8 × ground contact time²). Despite its theoretical advantages, a direct comparison between the RSI and DRI remains unexplored in the literature, which justifies the relevance of the present study.
This study aims to compare the RSI and the DRI in physically active adults of both sexes during the execution of the Drop Jump at four different drop heights (20, 30, 40, and 50 cm). The specific objectives are: (a) to characterize performance across the four height conditions; (b) to analyze differences between sexes in both indices; (c) to examine the effect of drop height on both indices; and (d) to explore the informative complementarity between the two indices.
University Institute of Maia is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants perform 3 valid Drop Jump trials from a 20 cm drop height
Other: Drop Jump Protocol
Participants perform 3 valid Drop Jump trials from a 30 cm drop height
Other: Drop Jump Protocol
Participants perform 3 valid Drop Jump trials from a 40 cm drop height
Other: Drop Jump Protocol
Participants perform 3 valid Drop Jump trials from a 50 cm drop height
Other: Drop Jump Protocol
Participants perform 3 valid Drop Jump trials at each of four drop heights (20, 30, 40, and 50 cm) in a randomized order, with 1 minute of rest between trials and 5 minutes between conditions. Jump height and ground contact time are recorded using a contact mat (ChronoJump, Boscosystem, Spain) for subsequent calculation of the RSI and DRI.
Also known as: DJ
Reactive Strength Index (RSI)
Calculated as RSI = jump height (m) / ground contact time (s), measured during the Drop Jump at four drop heights (20, 30, 40, and 50 cm).
Time frame: Baseline
Dynamic Rebound Index (DRI)
Calculated as DRI = (box height (m) + jump height (m)) / (9.8 × ground contact time² (s)), measured during the Drop Jump at four drop heights (20, 30, 40, and 50 cm)
Time frame: Baseline
Jump Height
Vertical jump height (m) recorded via contact mat during the Drop Jump.
Time frame: Baseline
Ground Contact Time
Time (s) spent in contact with the ground during the Drop Jump, recorded via contact mat.
Time frame: Baseline
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Institute of Maia