ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07472491LUMINAUpdated Jun 29, 2026

A Phase 2/3 Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Mangaciclanol for Contrast-Enhanced MRI of CNS or Body in Adult Patients

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Mangaciclanol, also known as GEH200486 Injection, 0.5 mmol/mL and MRI Scan in Known or Highly Suspected Central Nervous System (CNS) Lesion and Known or Highly Suspected Body (Excluding CNS) Lesion, sponsored by GE Healthcare. Recruiting at 7 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-29.

Sponsored by GE Healthcare · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
640
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an operationally combined Phase 2/3 study, which will be conducted and evaluated in 2 distinct parts:

  • Phase 2: Prospective, adaptive, multicenter, non-randomized, single-blind, dose-finding, including participants with known or highly suspected lesions of the CNS. The aim of the Phase 2 part is to identify an optimized dose of mangaciclanol for the Phase 3 part of the study.
  • Phase 3: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blind, cross-over, including participants with known or highly suspected lesions of the CNS or body. The aim of the Phase 3 part is to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of mangaciclanol-enhanced MRI for the detection and characterization of lesions of the CNS or body.

The investigational medicinal products (IMPs) used during the trial are mangaciclanol and gadobutrol (comparator IMP).

Primary and key secondary efficacy analyses will be based on independent central blinded image evaluation (BIE), and Phase 2 data will be analyzed prior to commencement of Phase 3.

02

Conditions studied

  • Known or Highly Suspected Central Nervous System (CNS) Lesion
  • Known or Highly Suspected Body (Excluding CNS) Lesion

Keywords

  • Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Mn-based contrast agents (MBCAs)
  • Gd-based contrast agents (GBCAs)
  • Lesion visualization
03

In context

Lead sponsor

GE Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 176 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The participant is of legal majority age, as defined by local laws and regulations at the time of signing the ICF.
  • The participant is able and willing to comply with study procedures as described in the protocol.
  • The participant has read, understood, signed and dated the ICF prior to any study procedures.
  • Phases 2 and 3 CNS: Participants presenting with known or highly suspected enhancing CNS lesions referred as part of standard care for contrast-enhancing MRI of the CNS. The suspicion may be based on a previous imaging procedure such as computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or MRI performed within 12 months prior to ICF signature.
  • Phase 3 body only: Participants presenting with known or highly suspected enhancing lesions in at least 1 body region (i.e., head and neck, thorax, abdomen, pelvis, and musculoskeletal system [only breast in the United States in compliance with local approved indications of gadobutrol]) referred as part of standard care for contrast-enhancing MRI of the body. The suspicion may be based on a previous imaging procedure such as CT, PET/CT, ultrasound or MRI performed within 12 months prior to ICF signature.
  • The participant is scheduled for a contrast-enhanced MRI examination of the CNS or a body region for clinical reasons and has agreed to have a second contrast-enhanced MRI examination for the purpose of this study.
  • The participant is in a clinically stable condition (i.e., no acute deterioration within 48 hours before enrollment).
  • Female Participants: The participant is a female who is either surgically sterile (has had a documented bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and/or documented hysterectomy), (cessation of menses for more than 1 year), or non-lactating, or if of the results of a serum human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy test, performed at screening and the results of a urine pregnancy test, or serum human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy test performed prior to each administration of IMP (with the result known before IMP administration), must be negative. Female participants of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate and not harvest or donate eggs from screening until 30 days after final dose of IMP. Such methods include hormonal contraception including oral, intravaginal, transdermal, injectable, and implantable contraceptives; intrauterine device; intrauterine hormone-releasing system; bilateral tubal occlusion; vasectomized partner. Total abstinence, in accordance with the lifestyle of the participant, is also acceptable.
  • Male Participants: The participant is a male who is surgically sterile (vasectomy or bilateral orchidectomy), a male who is sexually active with a partner who is not of childbearing potential, or a male who is sexually active with a partner of childbearing potential who must agree to use adequate contraception and not harvest or donate sperm from screening until 90 days after final dose of IMP. Adequate contraception for the male participant (and any female partner, if she is of childbearing potential) is defined as using hormonal contraception (including oral, intravaginal, transdermal, injectable or implantable contraceptives), an intrauterine device, or an intrauterine hormone-releasing system, combined with at least one of the following forms of contraception: a diaphragm, a cervical cap, or a condom. Total abstinence, in accordance with the lifestyle of the participant, is also acceptable.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participant has previously enrolled in this mangaciclanol study, including participation in an earlier phase or cohort.
  • The participant has a to MRI examination, such as the presence of a cardiac pacemaker or other electronic devices, presence of ferromagnetic metal foreign bodies in vulnerable positions or within positions that would affect the imaged field of view, presence of certain tattoos that may raise a safety concern for MRI, participant suffering from severe claustrophobia which is not manageable with standard sedation, or participant working as a machinist, welder or metal worker (unless the participant will undergo thorough screening by radiology personnel to rule out the presence of metallic foreign bodies, especially in or near the eyes).
  • Participant with severe cardiovascular disease (e.g., known long syndrome including QTc prolongation based on screening , acute myocardial infarction within the past 14 days, unstable angina, congestive heart failure class III/IV by classification, or acute stroke within the past 48 hours).
  • (Phase 2 only) Participant with an estimated (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) within 14 days prior to the first IMP administration.
  • (Phase 3 only) Participant with an eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m2 calculated using the CKD-EPI within 14 days prior to the first IMP administration.
  • Participant with increased likelihood of specifically to mangaciclanol, gadolinium or a component of the formulation.
  • Participant has received any non-study contrast agent within 72 hours prior to the first study MRI, or is planning to receive any non-study contrast agent during the trial until 24 ± 4 hours after the second study MRI.
  • Participant has received any product within 30 days or within 5 times the half-life of that drug, whichever is shorter, prior to or concurrent with this study.
  • Participant is expected/scheduled to have any treatment or medical procedure (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, , resection, etc.) that may impact aspects of the imaged lesions from the first study MRI up to 24 hours after the second study MRI. (Participants under and/or maintenance chemotherapy with a stable dose at the time of screening visit and throughout the trial can be included).
  • Participant may not be able to complete the study, based on their anticipated , or where study participation may compromise the management of the participant, or any other reason that in the judgment of the investigator makes the participant unsuitable for participation in the study.
  • Participant is pregnant or planning to become pregnant, or breast-feeding.
  • Participant is unable or unlikely to comply with the protocol, e.g., uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and/or considered unlikely to complete the trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
640 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Phase 2

    An initial dose of 0.1 mmol/kg mangaciclanol will be compared to the standard dose of gadobutrol (0.1 mmol/kg) in Cohort 1, in approximately 60 participants. A second cohort (Cohort 2) may be initiated based on the outcome of the analysis of Cohort 1. This cohort will include approximately 60 participants (higher or lower dose), or 30 participants (same dose), depending on the dose of mangaciclanol selected for further evaluation.

    Drug: Mangaciclanol, also known as GEH200486 Injection, 0.5 mmol/mL · Diagnostic Test: MRI Scan · Drug: Gadobutrol

  • Active comparator
    Phase 3 mangaciclanol-gadobutrol

    Participants with known or highly suspected lesions of CNS or body, randomized to receive treatment sequence mangaciclanol (V2) followed by gadobutrol (V4)

    Drug: Mangaciclanol, also known as GEH200486 Injection, 0.5 mmol/mL · Diagnostic Test: MRI Scan · Drug: Gadobutrol

  • Active comparator
    Phase 3 gadobutrol-mangaciclanol

    Participants with known or highly suspected lesions of CNS or body, randomized to receive treatment sequence gadobutrol (V2) followed by mangaciclanol (V4)

    Drug: Mangaciclanol, also known as GEH200486 Injection, 0.5 mmol/mL · Diagnostic Test: MRI Scan · Drug: Gadobutrol

Interventions

  • DrugMangaciclanol, also known as GEH200486 Injection, 0.5 mmol/mL

    Single intravenous (IV) administration of Mangaciclanol (GEH200486 Injection, 0.5 mmol/mL) followed by a 20mL saline flush

  • Diagnostic testMRI Scan

    MRI Scan starting prior to IMP administration and continuing for up to 60 minutes post IMP administration

  • DrugGadobutrol

    Single intravenous (IV) administration of Gadobutrol (0.1 mmol/kg) followed by a 20mL saline flush

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 2 Primary Endpoint - Overall diagnostic preference

    Overall diagnostic preference based on global matched pairs reads according to a 3-point scale that is derived from a 5-point scale (1 = greatly prefer mangaciclanol/prefer mangaciclanol, 0 = no preference, -1 = prefer gadobutrol/greatly prefer gadobutrol), as evaluated by 3 blinded independent readers.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  2. Phase 3 Primary Endpoint - Lesion visualization criteria

    Lesion visualization criteria (lesion border delineation, internal morphology and degree of lesion contrast enhancement) for paired (unenhanced plus mangaciclanol-enhanced) MRIs compared to unenhanced MRI based on the primary reads on a 4-point scale (1 = poor / none; 2 = moderate; 3 = good; 4 = excellent) for up to 3 of the most representative lesions.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Lesion visualization criteria

    Lesion visualization criteria (lesion border delineation, internal morphology, and degree of lesion contrast enhancement) on a 4-point scale (1 = poor / none; 2 = moderate; 3 = good; 4 = excellent) for up to 3 of the most representative lesions based on the primary reads.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  2. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Number of lesions

    Number of lesions based on global matched pairs reads and primary reads, and size and location of up to 3 of the most representative lesions based on the primary reads.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  3. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Technical adequacy of images for diagnosis

    Technical adequacy of images for diagnosis according to categorical assessment of image quality based on the primary reads.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  4. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Contrast enhancement percentage (CE%)

    Quantitative measurements of percentage of contrast enhancement (CE%) between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images, will be determined per participant as the average for up to 3 of the most representative lesions (i.e., the same lesions identified for assessment of lesion visualization scores) based on evaluation of paired (unenhanced and contrast-enhanced) images

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  5. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)

    Quantitative measurements of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and change in CNR (ΔCNR) between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images, will be determined per participant as the average for up to 3 of the most representative lesions (i.e., the same lesions identified for assessment of lesion visualization scores) based on evaluation of paired (unenhanced and contrast-enhanced) images.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  6. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

    Quantitative measurements of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) will be determined per participant as the average for up to 3 of the most representative lesions (i.e., the same lesions identified for assessment of lesion visualization scores) based on evaluation of paired (unenhanced and contrast-enhanced) images.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  7. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Intra-reader reproducibility regarding overall diagnostic preference (primary endpoint).

    Intra-reader reproducibility (from 10% re-read) will be analyzed for overall diagnostic preference according to a 3-point scale (as nominal response) and a 5-point scale (as ordinal response with linear relationship).

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  8. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Inter-reader agreement regarding overall diagnostic preference (primary endpoint).

    Inter-reader agreement will be analyzed for overall diagnostic preference according to a 3-point scale (as nominal response) and a 5-point scale (as ordinal response with linear relationship).

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  9. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Incidence of TEAEs

    Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  10. Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in serum biochemistry laboratory test results

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in serum biochemistry laboratory test results

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  11. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in hematology laboratory test results

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in hematology laboratory test results.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  12. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in urinalysis test results

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in urinalysis test results.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  13. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in millimeters of mercury.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  14. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in respiratory rate

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in respiratory rate (breaths per minute).

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  15. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in heart rate

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in heart rate (beats per minute).

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  16. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in temperature

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in temperature (degrees Celsius).

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  17. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in electrocardiogram examinations

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in electrocardiogram examinations (PR, QRS, and QTcF).

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  18. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in physical examination findings

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in physical examination findings.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  19. Phase 2 Secondary Endpoint - Incidence of abnormal safety parameters

    Incidence of abnormal vital signs, 12-lead ECG, physical examination, clinical laboratory parameters, and urinalysis results.

    Time frame: 4-47 days

  20. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Lesion Visualization

    Lesion visualization criteria (lesion border delineation, internal morphology, and degree of contrast enhancement) for paired (unenhanced and contrast-enhanced) MRIs based on primary reads of images acquired with mangaciclanol as compared to gadobutrol, according to a 4-point scale for up to 3 of the most representative lesions.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  21. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Overall diagnostic preference based on global matched pairs reads

    Overall diagnostic preference based on global matched pairs reads according to a 3-point scale that is derived from a 5-point scale (1 = greatly prefer/prefer mangaciclanol; 0 = no preference; ˗1 = greatly prefer/prefer gadobutrol), as evaluated by 3 blinded independent readers.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  22. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Number of lesions

    Number of lesions based on global matched pairs reads, on-site investigator reads and primary reads, and size and location of up to 3 of the most representative lesions based on primary reads and on-site investigator reads.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  23. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Technical adequacy of images for diagnosis

    Technical adequacy of images for diagnosis according to a categorical assessment of image quality based on the primary reads and the on-site investigator reads will be described only in terms of number and percentage of participants.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  24. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Patient diagnosis and diagnostic confidence

    Patient diagnosis and diagnostic confidence according to a 5-point scale (nil, poor, moderate, high, excellent) based on primary reads and on-site investigator reads.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  25. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Contrast enhancement percentage (CE%)

    Quantitative measurements of percentage of contrast enhancement (CE%) between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images, will be determined per participant as the average for up to 3 of the most representative lesions (i.e., the same lesions identified for assessment of lesion visualization scores) based on evaluation of paired (unenhanced and contrast-enhanced) images.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  26. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)

    Quantitative measurements of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and change in CNR (ΔCNR) between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images, will be determined per participant as the average for up to 3 of the most representative lesions (i.e., the same lesions identified for assessment of lesion visualization scores) based on evaluation of paired (unenhanced and contrast-enhanced) images.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  27. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

    Quantitative measurements of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) will be determined per participant as the average for up to 3 of the most representative lesions (i.e., the same lesions identified for assessment of lesion visualization scores) based on evaluation of paired (unenhanced and contrast-enhanced) images.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  28. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Lesion visualization criteria

    Lesion visualization criteria for unenhanced and paired (unenhanced and contrast-enhanced) MRIs based on the on-site investigator (radiologists) reads for up to 3 of the most representative lesions.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  29. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Per-lesion sensitivity

    Per-lesion sensitivity of mangaciclanol-enhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI for detection of malignancy, based on histopathological reference standard

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  30. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Per-lesion specificity

    Per-lesion specificity of mangaciclanol-enhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI for detection of malignancy, based on histopathological reference standard

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  31. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - The impact on patient treatment plan

    The impact on patient treatment plan (yes/no; including resection, biopsy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, other specified treatment) as assessed by the on-site investigator for each contrast agent.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  32. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Intra-reader reproducibility regarding lesion visualization criteria (primary endpoint)

    Intra-reader reproducibility will be evaluated for lesion visualization criteria (lesion border delineation, internal morphology and degree of contrast enhancement) for each treatment using a Bland-Altman plot for absolute agreement on a subset of participants with re-reads (10%). Descriptive statistics will be provided for the first vs. second measurement, as well as for the minimum vs. maximum values. Additionally, descriptive statistics will be presented for the absolute value of the paired differences between the 2 measurements.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  33. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Inter-reader agreement regarding lesion visualization criteria (primary endpoint)

    Inter-reader agreement will be analyzed using both a 2-way random effect model for consistency and absolute agreement to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  34. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Incidence of participants with at least 1 new lesion detected

    Incidence of participants with at least 1 new lesion detected on paired MRI compared to unenhanced MRI based on global matched pairs reads.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  35. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Incidence of TEAEs.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  36. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in serum biochemistry laboratory test results

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI serum biochemistry laboratory test results.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  37. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in hematology laboratory test results

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in hematology laboratory test results.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  38. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in urinalysis test results

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in urinalysis test results.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  39. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in millimeters of mercury.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  40. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in respiratory rate

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in respiratory rate (breaths per minute).

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  41. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in heart rate

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in heart rate (beats per minute).

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  42. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in temperature

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in temperature (degrees Celsius).

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  43. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoint - Number and percentage of participants with changes from baseline in physical examination findings

    Absolute value and change from pre-MRI in physical examination findings.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

  44. Phase 3 Secondary Endpoints - Incidence of abnormal safety parameters

    Incidence of abnormal vital signs, physical examination, clinical laboratory parameters, and urinalysis results.

    Time frame: 4-74 days

07

Study locations

7 of 7 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2027, 19 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 12, 2026
First posted
Mar 16, 2026
StartActual
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
Last update
Jun 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07472491
Lead sponsor
GE Healthcare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 16, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 29, 2026

Study contacts

Jay Chahal
Contact
jay.chahal@gehealthcare.com
+44 7786702088
Catherine Copse
Contact
Stephanie Van de Ven
study director · GE Healthcare

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion