ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07467954Updated Mar 12, 2026

Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG and Fractional CO₂ Laser in Skin Rejuvenation

An interventional study of Fractional CO₂ laser and Long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in Skin Rejuvenation and Laser, sponsored by Universitas Padjadjaran. Recruiting at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 59 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-12.

Sponsored by Universitas Padjadjaran · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2025, registered Mar 2026).
  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 59 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Skin rejuvenation is an effort to improve skin condition from the signs of skin aging. Skin aging is a complex biological process influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, leading to changes in the epidermis and dermis, including decreased collagen characterized by dermal thinning, as well as alterations in skin appearance such as laxity and wrinkles. Laser therapy is one of the treatment modalities for skin rejuvenation, aiming to induce neocollagenesis and collagen remodeling, resulting in dermal thickening and improvement in skin appearance. Fractional CO₂ laser is an ablative laser considered the gold standard therapy for skin rejuvenation, whereas Long Pulsed (LP) Nd:YAG 1064 nm is a nonablative laser that is also used for skin rejuvenation. To date, there have been no studies evaluating the comparative effectiveness between fractional CO₂ laser and LP Nd:YAG 1064 nm for skin rejuvenation. Therefore, research comparing the effectiveness of fractional CO₂ laser and LP Nd:YAG 1064 nm for skin rejuvenation is needed, assessed based on dermal thickness, skin elasticity, wrinkles, and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Rejuvenation
  • Laser
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universitas Padjadjaran is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients with skin aging classified as Glogau scale II-III
  • Age 30-59 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Active smokers.
  • Individuals with high levels of sun exposure.
  • History of facial laser therapy, microdermabrasion, chemical peeling, botulinum toxin injection, microneedling, or skin booster injections within the past six months.
  • Use of oral isotretinoin within the past six months.
  • Use of topical retinoids or their derivatives, topical vitamin C, or other collagen-stimulating and skin-rejuvenating agents within the past two weeks.
  • Use of oral vitamin C, collagen-stimulating supplements, antioxidants, or hormone therapy with skin-rejuvenating effects within the past one month.
  • Presence of active facial skin inflammation.
  • History of keloid formation.
  • History of allergy to topical lidocaine anesthesia.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    In this split-face study, each participant received fractional CO₂ laser treatment on one side of the face. The treated side was randomly assigned. The procedure was performed three times at one-month intervals.

    Procedure: Fractional CO₂ laser

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2

    In the same participants, the contralateral side of the face received long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser treatment. The side allocation was randomized. The procedure was performed three times at one-month intervals.

    Procedure: Long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser

Interventions

  • ProcedureFractional CO₂ laser

    Fractional CO₂ laser was applied to one randomized side of the face in a split-face design for skin rejuvenation. Treatments were performed three times at one-month intervals. The laser delivers fractional ablative microthermal zones to stimulate dermal remodeling and collagen production. Treatment parameters were adjusted according to skin type and clinical indication.

  • ProcedureLong-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser

    Long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser was applied to the contralateral randomized side of the face in a split-face design for skin rejuvenation. Treatments were performed three times at one-month intervals. The laser delivers non-ablative dermal heating to stimulate collagen remodeling and improve skin texture and elasticity.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dermal Thickness

    Dermal thickness was assessed based on the two-dimensional area of the hyperechoic band that appears brighter than the epidermis on ultrasonography assessment.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 20 weeks

  2. Skin Elasticity

    Skin elasticity was defined as the ability of the skin to return to its original shape after deformation caused by mechanical traction. It was measured using a skin elasticity meter, and the R (recovery) value was assessed at 8 evaluation points on the face.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 20 weeks

  3. Wrinkles

    Lines or folds formed on the skin surface as a result of mechanical stress, skin dehydration, or repetitive muscular activity, and were evaluated using a facial skin analyzer

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 20 weeks

  4. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Scores

    A 5-point rating scale (1-5) used to measure the degree of aesthetic improvement in patients following a procedure.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 20 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2026, 4 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 8, 2026
First posted
Mar 12, 2026
StartActual
Oct 14, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 10, 2026
CompletionEst.
Apr 16, 2026
Last update
Mar 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07467954
Lead sponsor
Universitas Padjadjaran
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 12, 2026
Start date
Oct 14, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 10, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 16, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 12, 2026

Study contacts

Ahmad R Ganiem, M.D., Ph.D
Contact
rizalbdg@gmail.com
+62 878 2288 3773
Kartika Ruchiatan, M.D.
Contact
kartika.ruchiatan@unpad.ac.id
+62 811 247932
Kartika Ruchiatan, M.D.
principal investigator · Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion