ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07463742Updated Aug 20, 2026

Transcriptomic Profile Changes in Benign Tracheal Stenosis: Wedge Resection vs. Radial Incision

An interventional study of Bronchoscopy, carbon dioxide (CO2) laser wedge resection and Radial incision with dilation in Tracheal Stenosis, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Some people develop a narrowing of their windpipe (trachea), called benign tracheal stenosis, which can make it hard to breathe. Doctors often treat this by using a bronchoscope-a thin, flexible tube with a camera-to open up the airway or remove scar tissue. While these procedures help patients breathe better, we do not fully understand why the narrowing occurs or how the tissue heals afterward.

The purpose of this study is to better understand the biological changes in the airway tissue before and after these standard medical procedures. During the procedure, small samples of tissue that would already be collected as part of normal care will be analyzed in the laboratory. The results may help doctors learn more about airway healing and could guide better treatments in the future.

Read the detailed description

Benign tracheal stenosis (BTS) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening condition caused by fibroinflammatory scarring that narrows the airway. Etiologies include post-intubation, tracheostomy, and idiopathic disease. Bronchoscopic intervention is the first-line treatment; however, recurrence rates exceed 50%, and the optimal technique remains uncertain. Two widely used modalities-carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser wedge resection and radial incision with dilation-have never been directly compared in a randomized trial. Preliminary evidence, including our meta-analysis, suggests wedge resection may yield lower recurrence rates and longer recurrence-free intervals, but the biological mechanisms underlying these differences remain unknown.

This project will conduct a randomized pilot study of 40 BTS patients comparing CO₂ laser wedge resection and radial incision with dilation. Endobronchial biopsies will be collected before and one month after intervention and analyzed using bulk ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing and spatial transcriptomics to capture both global and spatially resolved gene expression changes. This dual-modality approach will map molecular pathways involved in fibrosis resolution, immune cell dynamics, and epithelial repair. Patients will be followed for two years with standardized clinical, physiologic, and imaging assessments, and molecular signatures will be correlated with recurrence-free survival and other clinically meaningful outcomes.

By combining prospective clinical data with high-resolution transcriptomic profiling, this study addresses critical gaps in mechanistic understanding and comparative effectiveness evidence for BTS management. The findings will establish a biologic framework for selecting optimal bronchoscopic approaches, identify candidate therapeutic targets to prevent recurrence, and generate effect-size estimates to power a future multicenter randomized controlled trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tracheal Stenosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • tracheal stenosis
  • bronchoscopy
  • wedge resection
  • CO2 laser
03

In context

Tracheal Stenosis

42 studies on the registry are indexed under Tracheal Stenosis; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is above the median of 22 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Tracheal Stenosis.

Browse Tracheal Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 700 studies on the registry; 132 are open to participants now.

Of its 92 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • symptomatic tracheal stenosis
  • idiopathic subglottic stenosis
  • iatrogenic tracheal stenosis from intubation or tracheostomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • positive ANA or ANCA
  • tracheal stenosis from infection, i.e. TB
  • tracheal stenosis with cartilage fracture
  • tracheal stenosis with malacia
  • tracheal stenosis from
  • tracheal stenosis from benign tumor
  • presence of glottic or supraglottic stenosis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser wedge resection

    Procedure: Bronchoscopy, carbon dioxide (CO2) laser wedge resection

  • Active comparator
    Radial incision and dilation

    Procedure: Radial incision with dilation

Interventions

  • ProcedureBronchoscopy, carbon dioxide (CO2) laser wedge resection

    CO2 laser wedge resection - removing scar tissue with laser, leading tissue bridges.

  • ProcedureRadial incision with dilation

    Radial incision with dilation - making radial cuts at the circumferential scar site, followed by balloon dilation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in transcriptomic pathway activation scores

    Time frame: at the time of the second procedure (1 month from the initial invervention)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kang N, Ho A, Bain PA, Zhang C. Comparing CO2 Laser Wedge Resection to Radial Incision With Dilation in the Endoscopic Treatment of Benign Tracheal Stenosis: A Systematic Review. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2026 Feb 20;33(2):e01064. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000001064. eCollection 2026 Apr 1. PubMed 41718210 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data (IPD) from this study will be shared in a de-identified form for research purposes only, consistent with participant confidentiality protections. The shared dataset will include: Clinical data: age, sex, relevant medical history related to benign tracheal stenosis, treatment type (CO₂ laser wedge resection vs. radial incision with dilation), recurrence status, symptom scores, spirometry results (PIF, PEF), and imaging findings. Transcriptomic data: bulk RNA-seq and spatial RNA-seq gene expression data from pre- and post-treatment tissue samples, without any personally identifiable information. Exclusions: No names, initials, dates of birth, social security numbers, or other direct identifiers will be shared. All samples and data will be linked only by unique study codes. Intended Use: Shared data will be available to qualified researchers for secondary analyses of benign tracheal stenosis or related molecular research, in accordance with institutional an

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: 5/1/2026 to 5/1/2036

Access criteria: Who can access: Only qualified researchers who have submitted a request and agreed to the terms of use, including confidentiality and data security requirements, will have access to the shared IPD. These researchers must be affiliated with an academic, clinical, or research institution. What they can access: De-identified datasets including clinical data (age, sex, medical history, treatment type, recurrence status, symptom scores, spirometry, imaging) and transcriptomic data (bulk RNA-seq and spatial RNA-seq). No personally identifiable information (names, initials, dates of birth, social security numbers) will be included. How they can access: Access will be provided through a secure, password-protected database or data repository approved by the institution. Researchers must complete a data use agreement specifying that data are for research purposes only and will not be shared further.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07463742
Responsible party
Chenchen Zhang (Principal Investigator, University of Maryland, Baltimore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 11, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026
Primary completion
May 1, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Chenchen Zhang, MD
Contact
chenchen.zhang@som.umaryland.edu
410-328-8138

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion