An interventional study of Conventional Ventilation and Perioperative positive pressure ventilation in Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs), sponsored by Jun Zhang. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-10.
Sponsored by Jun Zhang · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) ranges from 5% to 33%. PPCs significantly prolong hospital stay, increase the economic burden, and are associated with postoperative mortality at 30 days and 1 year. The occurrence of PPCs is associated with multiple perioperative factors. A multimodal approach may provide better prevention against PPCs. We hypothesize that perioperative prophylactic positive pressure ventilation can reduce the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery.
Globally, over 313 million surgical procedures are performed annually. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) ranges from 5% to 33%. PPCs include respiratory tract infection, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm, and aspiration pneumonia, representing the second most common postoperative complication, second only to surgical site infection. PPCs significantly prolong hospital stay, increase economic burden, and are associated with 30-day and 1-year postoperative mortality.
The occurrence of PPCs is associated with multiple perioperative factors. General anesthesia induction can alter the distribution of gas within the lungs, shifting ventilation toward the ventral and left regions, resulting in decreased dorsal ventilation and varying degrees of atelectasis. This leads to ventilation inhomogeneity and ventilation-perfusion mismatch, impairing systemic oxygenation. Studies have shown that during mechanical ventilation, mechanical stress increases in atelectatic areas, potentially causing tissue hypoxia, while adjacent areas may experience overdistension and hyperoxia. Hyperoxia and overdistension promote the release of pulmonary pro-inflammatory factors, reactive oxygen species, and increased leukocyte infiltration. Research indicates that local tissue hypoxia and altered mechanical stress due to atelectasis can induce lung injury. An experimental study reported ultrastructural evidence of microvascular endothelial disruption in atelectatic lung tissue, suggesting that such damage may increase pulmonary vascular permeability and protein leakage. Furthermore, the systemic inflammatory response triggered by the nociceptive stimuli of major thoracic or abdominal surgery, combined with airway hyperreactivity, can collectively disrupt the alveolar epithelial barrier and impair mucociliary clearance. After extubation at the end of surgery, the risk of atelectasis and hypoxemia persists due to residual anesthetic effects, pain-induced suppression of the cough reflex, among other factors. These elements, combined with patient-related factors (e.g., advanced age, smoking, pre-existing lung disease), collectively contribute to the development of PPCs.
Lung-protective ventilation strategies, including low tidal volume, application of PEEP, and intermittent recruitment maneuvers, are now widely used clinically to prevent PPCs. Some scholars posit that the primary principle of lung-protective ventilation is the prophylactic perioperative use of positive pressure ventilation (P.O.P-ventilation), aimed at minimizing the reduction in lung volume throughout the perioperative period. Evidence suggests that prophylactic positive pressure ventilation applied before anesthesia induction, during surgery, and after tracheal extubation can reduce the incidence of adverse postoperative respiratory events. Although lung-protective ventilation is increasingly adopted, critical gaps in evidence remain. How to best implement a multimodal, perioperative prophylactic positive pressure ventilation strategy to reduce PPCs requires further investigation. Therefore, in a preliminary study, we divided 120 patients scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation into three groups, applying 0, 5, or 10 cm H₂O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anesthesia induction, respectively, and observed the incidence of post-induction atelectasis. Our results showed that 10 cm H₂O of PEEP significantly reduced the occurrence of atelectasis following induction. However, this preliminary study did not follow up on the incidence of postoperative PPCs.
Building upon our preliminary findings, and to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of perioperative prophylactic positive pressure ventilation in reducing PPCs, we propose the following strategies for our new clinical study: (1) Increase the sample size and enroll patients undergoing abdominal surgery at intermediate-to-high risk for PPCs (Assessement of Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia score, ARISCAT score ≥ 45); (2) Implement a multimodal strategy for prophylactic positive airway pressure. This includes using 10 cm H₂O PEEP during anesthesia induction, applying electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided individualized PEEP during surgery, and utilizing high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy after tracheal extubation to maintain positive end-expiratory pressure. (3) Follow up and assess PPCs occurring within 7 days postoperatively during the hospital stay. Through these strategies, we aim to further establish the protective role of a perioperative prophylactic positive pressure ventilation strategy on postoperative lung outcomes, thereby providing an enhanced empirical foundation for optimizing the clinical prevention of PPCs.
Jun Zhang is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ASA physical status
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
In this group, no PEEP is applied during anesthesia induction; conventional PEEP of 5 cmH₂O is used intraoperatively; and conventional face-mask oxygen therapy (at an oxygen flow rate of 5 L/min) is administered after tracheal extubation.
Other: Conventional Ventilation
Perioperative Prophylactic Positive Airway Pressure Group. In this group, a PEEP of 10 cmH₂O is applied during general anesthesia induction; EIT-guided individualized PEEP is utilized during surgery; and following tracheal extubation, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy (with an FiO₂ of 40%) is administered to maintain positive end-expiratory pressure.
Other: Perioperative positive pressure ventilation
No PEEP is applied during anesthesia induction; conventional PEEP of 5 cmH₂O is used during surgery; and after tracheal extubation, conventional face mask oxygen therapy (at an oxygen flow rate of 5 L/min) is administered.
A PEEP of 10 cmH₂O is applied during general anesthesia induction; EIT-guided individualized PEEP is utilized during surgery; and following tracheal extubation, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy (with an FiO₂ of 40%) is administered to maintain positive end-expiratory pressure.
Incidence of PPCs
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a group of adverse respiratory events occurring after surgery, representing a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Common PPCs include atelectasis, pneumonia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, and bronchospasm. They are associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased healthcare costs, and higher short- and long-term mortality. Risk factors include patient age, pre-existing lung disease, smoking, and the type and duration of surgery/anesthesia. Preventive strategies, such as lung-protective ventilation, early mobilization, and incentive spirometry, are crucial in high-risk patients. Monitoring and timely management of PPCs are essential for improving surgical outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 1 week after surgery
ICU admission rate
Time frame: Up to 1 week after surgery
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: Whole hospital stay
Postoperative pain score
The postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score is a simple, widely used tool for quantifying a patient's subjective pain intensity. It typically consists of a 10-cm horizontal line anchored by the descriptors "no pain" (0) on the left and "worst pain imaginable" (10) on the right. The patient marks the line at a point corresponding to their pain level, and the score is determined by measuring the distance in centimeters from the left anchor. In the postoperative context, scores are often categorized for clinical interpretation: 0-3 cm indicates mild pain, 4-6 cm moderate pain, and 7-10 cm severe pain. It is a validated and sensitive instrument for tracking pain trends over time and assessing the effectiveness of analgesic interventions, forming a cornerstone of multimodal pain management protocols.
Time frame: Up to 1 week after surgery
Neutrophil extracellular traps
Time frame: Perioperative
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No — The data sets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Jun Zhang