CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07453940REVERSE-OPTIONUpdated Jul 1, 2026

Left Atrial Appendage Closure With Versus Without Pulsed Field Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Mild Symptoms and High Stroke Risk

An interventional study of LAAC plus PFA for persistent AF with high risk of stroke and LAAC for persistent AF with high risk of stroke in ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION and PFA Ablation and LAAC Procedures, sponsored by Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial to investigate whether concomitant left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and pulsed field ablation (PFA) is more effective than LAAC alone in improving the outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with high risk of stroke.

Emerging data show that some-especially those with persistent AF, high AF burden, or early atrial re-modelling-have high stroke and heart failure risks. This pilot study aims to assess whether combining LAAC and PFA improves outcomes more than LAAC alone in persistent AF patients at high stroke risk. Fifty participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the LAAC or LAAC plus PFA group, with group allocation blinded.

Baseline assessments included cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life questionnaire (AFEQT) , and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the LAAC group, patients will undergo electrical cardioversion followed by LAAC under general anesthesia; if sinus rhythm could not be achieved by the end of procedure, pharmocol cardioversion will be tried to restore it. In the LAAC plus PFA group, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and posterior wall isolation (PWI) will be performed using the FARAPULSE system, then LAAC will be done. If sinus rhythm could not be restored after PFA, cardioversion will be performed. Additional ablation is allowed only if a clear arrhythmia mechanism is identified; empirical ablation is prohibited. Follow-up occurs every two months with 7-day Holter monitoring. CPET, AFEQT, and brain MRI will be repeated at 6 months. During the blanking period, antiarrhythmic drugs may be used except amiodarone due to its long half-life. Ablation is not recommended within the first two months. Crossover to ablation is permitted only for patients with documented AF/AFL/AT recurrence and worsened symptoms (AFEQT score drop ≥10 points from baseline). At crossover or redo-ablation, AFEQT, CPET, and brain MRI will be repeated.

02

Conditions studied

  • ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
  • PFA Ablation and LAAC Procedures
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old.
  2. Subjects diagnosed with persistent AF with duration more than 3 months.
  3. Subjects with AFEQT score >70 .
  4. Subjects with CHA2DS2-VA score ≥2.
  5. Subjects who are willing and capable of providing ICF and participating in all testing associated with this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. AF that is secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, alcohol, or other reversible/non-cardiac causes.
  2. Subjects with the history of AF ablation, LAA surgically closed or otherwise excluded or the LAA anatomy does not accommodate a Closure Device.
  3. Left atrial anteroposterior diameter ≥ 5.5 cm.
  4. Heart failure with a NYHA III/IV and/or LVEF ≤35% within 3 months prior to the procedure.
  5. Any of the following events within 90 days of the Consent Date:

    • Myocardial infarction, unstable angina or coronary intervention or any cardiac surgery
    • Pericarditis or symptomatic pericardial effusion
    • Gastrointestinal bleeding
    • Stroke, TIA, or intracranial bleeding or any non-neurologic thromboembolic event
  6. Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use systemic anticoagulation.
  7. Subjects with contraindications or not tolerate to EP procedure, general anaesthesia, or the tests included in the study, like CPET, MRI.
  8. Subjects cannot be removed from Class I/III AAD for reasons other than atrial arrhythmia.
  9. Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant or lactating.
  10. Renal insufficiency if an eGFR is \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, or with any history of renal dialysis or renal transplant.
  11. Predicted life expectancy is less than 12 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LAAC+PFA group

    LAAC plus PFA

    Procedure: LAAC plus PFA for persistent AF with high risk of stroke

  • Active comparator
    LAAC group

    LAAC alone

    Procedure: LAAC for persistent AF with high risk of stroke

Interventions

  • ProcedureLAAC plus PFA for persistent AF with high risk of stroke

    Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and posterior wall isolation (PWI) will be performed using the FARAPULSE system, then LAAC will be done. If sinus rhythm could not be restored after PFA, cardioversion will be performed. Additional ablation is allowed only if a clear arrhythmia mechanism is identified; empirical ablation is prohibited.

  • ProcedureLAAC for persistent AF with high risk of stroke

    Patients will undergo electrical cardioversion followed by LAAC under general anesthesia; if sinus rhythm could not be achieved by the end of procedure, pharmocol cardioversion will be tried to restore it.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in peak VO₂ from baseline to 6 months as assessed by CPET

    Change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO₂) measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at the 6-month visit compared with baseline.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The change of AFEQT at 6-month visit compared to baseline.

    The change of Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life questionnaire (AFEQT) at 6-month visit compared to baseline, range: 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Symptomatic AF recurrence at 6 month visit after blanking period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. The change in CBF over 6 months.

    Change in cerebral blood flow (CBF) from baseline to 6 months as assessed by arterial spin labeling brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. The incidence of composite clinical events

    The incidence of composite clinical events, including death from cardiovascular causes, stroke (either ischemic or hemorrhagic), major bleeding or hospitalization with worsening of heart failure (unplanned hospitalization and/or intravenous use of diuretics) or acute coronary syndrome.

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS

  5. AF burden determined by 7 d Holter during the follow-up visits.

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS

  6. Echocardiology parameters

    LVEF, LA diameter, left atrial strain (LASr, LASct, LASI)

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS

  7. Cognitive function: MoCA scale

    Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score from baseline to 6 months, MoCA total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. The outcome will be summarized as the mean change (6-month minus baseline).

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS

Other outcomes

  1. Actionable AF recurrence rate at 6 months, defined as occurrence of any cardioversion, ablation or AAD treatment for AF post blanking period.

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS

  2. The change of Clinical Frailty Scale Health.

    The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) ranges from 1 to 9, with higher scores indicating worse frailty. The outcome will be summarized as the mean change (6-month minus baseline).

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS

  3. The change of NT-proBNP/BNP at 6 month compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS

  4. the imaging assessment

    Baseline and 6-month multimodal brain MRI, including three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging (3D T1), T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR), with optional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). DTI is an exploratory imaging endpoint.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07453940
Lead sponsor
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Responsible party
Chenyang Jiang (Chair, Cardiac Rhythm Branch, Chinese Society of Biotechnology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2026
Start date
May 7, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion