CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07439640Updated Feb 27, 2026

PEG Laxatives for Intestinal Preparation and Gut Microbiota in Cholecystectomy

An observational study in Cholecystectomy, sponsored by Tongji Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by Tongji Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study aims to investigate the impact of polyethylene glycol (PEG) laxatives used for bowel preparation on the gut microbiota of patients who have undergone cholecystectomy. Emerging evidence suggests that both cholecystectomy and high-dose PEG exposure can independently alter the intestinal microbial ecosystem. However, whether the microbiota of post-cholecystectomy patients is more vulnerable to PEG-induced perturbation and exhibits delayed recovery remains unknown.

Approximately 10 adults with prior cholecystectomy scheduled for colonoscopy and 10 age-matched controls without cholecystectomy will be enrolled. All participants will undergo standard colonoscopy preparation with PEG-based laxatives. Stool samples will be collected at five time points: before bowel preparation, at the first non-watery stool after colonoscopy, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-colonoscopy. Metagenomic shotgun sequencing will be performed to characterise the taxonomic and functional profiles of the gut microbiome. Alpha diversity, beta diversity, differential abundance, and metabolic pathway alterations will be compared within and between groups over time.

The findings are expected to reveal whether cholecystectomised individuals are more susceptible to long-term gut dysbiosis after PEG exposure, and to inform future strategies for microbiota restoration in this specific population.

Read the detailed description

Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been implicated in various gastrointestinal and metabolic disorders. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based laxatives, routinely administered for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy, induce transient osmotic diarrhoea and have been shown in animal models to cause prolonged alterations in microbial composition and function. Meanwhile, cholecystectomy, one of the most frequently performed abdominal surgeries, alters bile acid flow and enterohepatic circulation, which can modulate the gut microbial ecosystem and has been associated with increased risk of post-operative diarrhoea and even colorectal neoplasia. Despite these independent effects, the combined influence of cholecystectomy and PEG-based bowel preparation on the human gut microbiome has not been systematically investigated.

This is a prospective, parallel-group, observational cohort study conducted at Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. A total of approximately 20 participants will be recruited and allocated into two groups: the cholecystectomy group, consisting of individuals who have undergone cholecystectomy at least six months prior to enrolment and are scheduled for a screening or surveillance colonoscopy; and the control group, comprising individuals with an intact gallbladder who are matched for age and sex and are also scheduled for colonoscopy.

Eligible participants are aged 18 to 75 years, have no history of major organ disease, have not used antibiotics, probiotics, or prebiotics within six months before enrolment, and have no contraindications to colonoscopy or PEG intake. Exclusion criteria include pregnancy, severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, mental disorders, and inability to comply with stool collection procedures.

All participants will undergo standard bowel preparation using 2-4 L of PEG-4000/3350 solution according to routine clinical practice. No experimental intervention is administered.

Stool specimens of approximately 10 g each will be self-collected by participants at home using provided collection kits at five predefined time points: within three days before bowel preparation (baseline), at the first non-watery stool after colonoscopy, and at one month, three months, and six months after colonoscopy, each with a permitted window of ±7 days for the one-month visit and ±14 days for the three- and six-month visits. Samples will be immediately frozen at -80 °C until DNA extraction. Faecal genomic DNA will be subjected to shotgun metagenomic sequencing on the DNBSEQ-T7 platform. Raw reads will be filtered using fastp to remove adapter contamination and low-quality sequences. High-quality reads will be aligned to the human genome to exclude host DNA, and the remaining reads will be used for taxonomic profiling with MetaPhlAn or Kraken2/Bracken, and functional profiling with HUMAnN3 against the UniRef90 and KEGG databases.

The primary outcome is the change in gut microbial α-diversity, as measured by Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 indices, and β-diversity, assessed by Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and UniFrac distances, both within and between groups across the five time points.

Secondary outcomes include the temporal dynamics of specific taxa, such as the phylum Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio and butyrate-producing genera; differential abundance of species and functional pathways, including KEGG modules and MetaCyc reactions; and the correlation between microbial compositional shifts and clinical parameters, for example time since cholecystectomy and bowel movement frequency.

All statistical analyses will be performed using R. Within-group comparisons over time will be assessed by the Friedman test or repeated-measures ANOVA, or non-parametric equivalents, followed by post-hoc pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with false discovery rate correction. Between-group comparisons at each time point will be analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test or linear mixed-effects models adjusting for potential confounders. Principal coordinate analysis based on Bray-Curtis distances will visualise community separation, and permutational multivariate analysis of variance will test for significant clustering. Linear discriminant analysis effect size will identify taxa with differential abundance between groups, using an LDA score threshold of >2.0 and p \<0.05.

The study protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences.

By longitudinally profiling the gut microbiota of cholecystectomised and non-cholecystectomised individuals exposed to the same bowel preparation regimen, this study will delineate whether prior gallbladder removal predisposes patients to a more severe or prolonged PEG-induced dysbiosis. The findings may provide a microbiological rationale for tailored bowel preparation protocols or microbiota-targeted interventions, such as probiotics or post-colonoscopy dietary guidance, in this growing patient population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholecystectomy

Keywords

  • Gut Microbiota
  • Colonoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tongji Hospital is the lead sponsor of 373 studies on the registry; 204 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients scheduled for colonoscopy at the Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China. Participants are recruited consecutively from the outpatient clinic and voluntarily enrolled after providing written informed consent. Two cohorts are defined based on history of cholecystectomy: individuals with prior cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal group) and individuals with an intact gallbladder (normal group). All participants undergo routine bowel preparation with PEG-based laxatives and provide stool samples longitudinally over a 6-month period. No experimental interventions are administered.

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled to undergo colonoscopy with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based bowel preparation.
  • For the gallbladder removal group: prior cholecystectomy performed at least 6 months before enrolment.
  • For the normal group: intact gallbladder (no history of cholecystectomy).
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Willing to collect and mail stool samples at five specified time points (baseline, first non-watery stool after colonoscopy, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to colonoscopy (e.g., severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, acute gastrointestinal bleeding, severe coagulopathy).
  • Known intolerance or allergy to polyethylene glycol (PEG).
  • Use of antibiotics, probiotics, or prebiotics within 6 months prior to enrolment.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Mental disorders or any condition that may compromise the ability to comply with study procedures.
  • Major organ diseases (e.g., liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease stage 4-5, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus).
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the last 3 months.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Normal group

    Individuals with an intact gallbladder, matched for age and sex, who are scheduled for colonoscopy and serve as the control cohort. The same eligibility criteria, exclusion criteria, and observation procedures as the gallbladder removal group apply: participants are aged 18-75 years, free from major organ diseases, and have no recent use of antibiotics, probiotics, or prebiotics. Pregnancy, severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, mental disorders, and colonoscopy/PEG contraindications are exclusionary. Participants undergo identical PEG-based bowel preparation and provide stool samples at the same five time points. No intervention is administered. Approximately 10 participants are planned for this cohort.

  • Gallbladder removal group

    Individuals who have undergone cholecystectomy at least six months prior to enrolment and are scheduled for a screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Eligible participants are aged 18-75 years, have no history of major organ disease, and have not used antibiotics, probiotics, or prebiotics within six months before enrolment. Exclusion criteria include pregnancy, severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, mental disorders, and contraindications to colonoscopy or PEG intake. Participants receive standard bowel preparation with PEG-based laxatives according to routine clinical practice. No experimental intervention is administered. Stool samples are self-collected at five time points: within three days before bowel preparation, at the first non-watery stool after colonoscopy, and at one, three, and six months after colonoscopy. A total of approximately 10 participants are planned for this cohort.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in gut microbial diversity

    Assessment of α-diversity (Shannon index, Simpson index, Chao1 richness estimator) and β-diversity (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances) based on shotgun metagenomic sequencing of faecal samples. Comparisons will be made within each group across time points and between the gallbladder removal group and the normal group at each time point.

    Time frame: Baseline (within 3 days before bowel preparation);first non-watery stool after colonoscopy 9up to 48 hours after colonoscopy; 1 month (±7 days) after colonoscopy; 3 months (±14 days) after colonoscopy; 6 months (±14 days) after colonoscopy

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Gastroenterology Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical college, Huazhong University of Science and technology
    Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • van der Wulp MY, Derrien M, Stellaard F, Wolters H, Kleerebezem M, Dekker J, Rings EH, Groen AK, Verkade HJ. Laxative treatment with polyethylene glycol decreases microbial primary bile salt dehydroxylation and lipid metabolism in the intestine of rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013 Oct 1;305(7):G474-82. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00375.2012. Epub 2013 Jul 18. PubMed 23868407 ↗
  • Zou Y, Zeng S, Chen M, Li S, Fu Q, Zhou S, Zhou J. Gut microbiota in children with split-dose bowel preparations revealed by metagenomics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jul 18;13:1202007. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1202007. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37533931 ↗
  • Batista L, Robles V, Manichanh C, Ruiz L, Guagnozzi D, Pinsach F, Guarner F, Fernandez-Banares F. Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 28;22(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02392-w. PubMed 35764931 ↗
  • Amaral Raposo M, Sousa Oliveira E, Dos Santos A, Guadagnini D, El Mourabit H, Housset C, Lemoinne S, Abdalla Saad MJ. Impact of cholecystectomy on the gut-liver axis and metabolic disorders. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug;48(7):102370. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102370. Epub 2024 May 9. PubMed 38729564 ↗
  • Tang B, Li S, Li X, He J, Zhou A, Wu L, Xiao X, Wang S, Jiang H, Jian J, Hou Z, Ge Y, Lei Y, Zhou J, Tu D, Lu C, Yang M, Yang S. Cholecystectomy-related gut microbiota dysbiosis exacerbates colorectal tumorigenesis. Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 16;16(1):7638. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62956-8. PubMed 40819131 ↗
  • Tan L, Jia F, Liu Y. Advances in research on the role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis and precision management of gallstone disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 25;12:1535355. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1535355. eCollection 2025. PubMed 40636353 ↗
  • McGuinness AJ, O'Hely M, Stupart D, Watters D, Dawson SL, Hair C, Berk M, Mohebbi M, Loughman A, Guest G, Jacka FN. Prior Appendicectomy and Gut Microbiota Re-Establishment in Adults after Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy. Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 23;12(9):1938. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12091938. PubMed 39335452 ↗
  • Chen J, Sali A, Vitetta L. The gallbladder and vermiform appendix influence the assemblage of intestinal microorganisms. Future Microbiol. 2020 May;15:541-555. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0325. Epub 2020 Jun 1. PubMed 32478580 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 26, 2025
  • Informed consent form · Mar 28, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — De-identified individual participant data collected during this study, including: * Demographic information (age, sex) * Clinical characteristics (time since cholecystectomy, bowel movement frequency) * Metagenomic sequencing data (raw FASTQ files, taxonomic abundance tables, functional pathway profiles) * Stool sample collection time points * Laboratory processing and quality control data

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07439640
Lead sponsor
Tongji Hospital
Responsible party
Huaping Xie (Professor, Tongji Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
Start date
Jan 16, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 16, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 16, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

ping h Xie
Contact
hpxie@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn
86+13437187007
ping h Xie
study chair · Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion