CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07430501ARTEMISUpdated Feb 24, 2026

Using Digital Twin Technology and Clinical Decision Support Systems to Improve the Early Detection, Personalised Treatment, and Long-term Monitoring of Patients Across the Full Spectrum of Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD).

An observational study in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, sponsored by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
7,720
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to create a detailed virtual model to better understand how Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) develops. This model will also help predict heart problem at different stage of the disease.

Read the detailed description
  1. - Glossary CT : Computed Tomography CVD : Cardio-Vascular Disease HCC : Hepato Cellular Carcinoma MASH : Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis MASLD : Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease MRI : Magnetic Resonance Imaging PET : Positron Emission Tomography SLD : Steatotic Liver Disease TACE : Trans-Arterial ChemoEmbolisation TARE : Trans-Arterial RadioEmbolisation TIPS : Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt US : Ultrasound USE : Ultrasound elastography VCTE : Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography
  2. - Description of the Clininical Study

    ARTEMIs retrospective cohort responds to the definition of a "retrospective collection and analysis of health data obtained from individual patients or healthy persons in order to address scientific questions related to the understanding, prevention, diagnosis, monitoring or treatment of a disease, mental illness, or physical condition" as defined in the work programme of this call. In such, the definition of a clinical study as defined by Regulation 536/2014 (on medicinal products) is not applicable in the framework of our study.

    The cohort will serve the following main objectives:

    • To develop and validate machine-learning or mechanistic models that can predict the evolution of liver diseases, in particular MASLD at various stages (use cases 1 and 2), and the outcome of some intervention or therapies (use cases 3 and 4).
    • To identify new correlations or validate suspected correlations between specific observations, interventions and outcomes, in particular cardiovascular complications.
  3. - Study rationale Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is presently the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, accounting for a global prevalence of 25.24% (2). Its natural history remains unclear, given the multiple pathways through which disease progression takes place (3), as well as to the shortage of population-based studies addressing its long-term prognosis (4). As an attempt to alleviate the paucity of good quality data on MASLD's natural history (5) and to improve patient's care, the ARTEMIS project envisages to constitute a longitudinal cohort comprising patients at various stages of liver diseases, with emphasis on MASLD (use cases 1 and 2).

    Given the remarkable heterogeneity underlying MASLD mechanisms, the deployment of computational models has increased in popularity among the scientific community, as an effective means to unravel this intricate subject (6). In particular, the understanding of the human liver metabolism plays a key role towards a deeper understanding of the main drivers that rule disease progression. In such, mechanistic models play a major role in the representation of the complexity that is inherent to the liver and the gastroenterology system. In a complementary way, machine learning models are expected to respond to more precise questions related to different stages of the disease and related comorbidities, therefore allowing the prediction of diagnosis and prognosis, as well as risk stratification, based upon parameters that are specific to each subpopulation.

    In this light, the ARTEMIS cohort will be used to test new hypotheses, as well as to train, validate and evaluate the performance of computational models - including machine-learning models, mechanistic models and associations thereof - aimed to improve the management of MASLD patients. The ARTEMIs cohort will incorporate retrospective multisource data for MASLD patients along the spectrum of the disease, thus including MASH, cirrhosis and HCC patients. The cohort will include patients from 12 centres in 7 countries. The cohort will also incorporate data related to the most relevant comorbidities associated with these populations, most notably, cardiovascular events.

  4. - Extent and evaluation of current knowledge directly linked to the scientific question(s) to be answered by the clinical study

    In addition to the complexities concerning its natural history, MASLD has been associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiac events, including coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, heart failure, and arrhythmia. The exact mechanism by which MASLD increases the risk of CVD is not fully understood, but it is thought to be related to the systemic inflammation and metabolic dysfunction associated with the condition.

    Several studies have investigated the relationship between MASLD and cardiac events. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2016 (7), analysed 16 prospective and retrospective cohorts with 34,043 adult individuals (36.3% with MASLD) and approximately 2,600 CVD outcomes (>70% CVD deaths) over a median period of 6.9 years. They concluded that MASLD is associated with an increased risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events, although the design of the observational studies did not allow to draw definitive causal inferences.

    There is a consensus that MASLD patients should be closely monitored for cardiovascular risk factors and managed accordingly to reduce their risk of developing CVD. Nevertheless, given the high current prevalence of the disease and its expected growth, such monitoring may enormously stress the public healthcare systems.

    Solutions that help to stratify those MASLD patients at higher risk of suffering cardiovascular events, are needed. The ARTEMIs cohort is aimed to assist the development of this type of solutions, based on advanced computational models.

  5. - Objective(s) of the clinical study

The ARTEMIs project envisages to consolidate a holistic virtual model allowing, on the one hand, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in MASLD progression, as well as the prediction of cardiovascular events at different stages of the disease. In this light, 4 clinical cases will be considered, wherein theory-based mechanistic and data-driven AI models will be developed and validated, either individually or in association, depending on the clinical questions being raised.

The objective of ARTEMIs cohort is to assess the performance of mechanistic and AI-based models that will be deployed in the different clinical cases, based on their respective sensibility and specificity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Keywords

  • MASLD
  • Virtual twins
  • fatty liver patients
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 268 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population description involve a retrospective collection and analysis of health data obtained from individual patients or healthy persons. Patients along the MASLD spectrum will be recruited in 12 participant sites. A researcher will select cases fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria and process them according to the Project work plan.

Inclusion criteria

  1. - Clinical Use Case 1: Liver disease staging in MASLD patients - Prediction model of fibrosis changes (progression and regression), with ability to distinguish between fast and non-fast fibrosis progression among MASLD patients.

    • Age ≥18 years
    • Diagnosis of MASLD confirmed by radiological imaging (any type: MR, CT, PET, VCTE, US, USE...) or histology (gold standard, following MASH SAF score)
    • With at least one follow-up of minimum 1 year after diagnosis of MASLD, with radiological imaging or histology
  2. - Clinical Use case 2: MASLD and progression of cardiovascular diseases

    • Age ≥18 years MASLD patients regardless of disease stage of severity (from simple steatosis to cirrhosis)
    • Patients without known heart disease
    • Cardiovascular assessment available

3.1- Clinical Use case 3-TIPS: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who receive TIPS placement.

  • Age ≥18 years
  • TIPS indication (Baveno VII), except pre-emptive and salvage TIPS.
  • Recurrent variceal bleeding after failure of the usual pharmacological and endoscopic methods
  • Refractory or recurrent ascites or difficult to treat
  • Refractory Hydrothorax
  • Patients with diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (based on laboratory parameters, clinical, endoscopic, radiological or histological findings), of any aetiology.

3.2.- Clinical Use Case 3-LT: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who received liver transplantation.

  • Age ≥18 years
  • All patients with cirrhosis (all aetiologies) who were transplanted

    4.- Clinical Use Case 4: Prediction of cardiac complications due to HCC treatments* (*Note: includes surgical interventions, ablation, TACE, TARE, SIRT and immunotherapies)

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of HCC (any aetiology)
  • Cross sectional imaging follow-up (any modality) of liver diseases 6 months after treatment
  • Non-cirrhotic or no more than Child-Pugh B cirrhosis.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
  • Patients without history of prior HCC
  • Patients with a history of hypertension should be well controlled (\< 140/90 mmHg) on a regimen of antihypertensive therapy.
  • With a minimum follow-up of two years or until death, after diagnosis of HCC

    5.- Other populations (participation in control arms)

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Subjects presenting cardiac fibrosis, without a known MASLD diagnosis (as controls for use case 2)

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. - Clinical Use Case 1: Liver disease staging in MASLD patients - Prediction model of fibrosis changes (progression and regression), with ability to distinguish between fast and non-fast fibrosis progression among MASLD patients.

    • Missing data on blood glucose, BMI and metabolic status.
    • Patients who have received systemic chemotherapy
    • Patients with hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV), alcoholic liver disease (more than 5 years of drinking history, equivalent to alcohol volume ≥ 30g / D in male and ≥ 20g / D in female), drug-induced liver disease or autoimmune hepatitis.
    • Subjects having a significant risk of bleeding (platelet \< 50x109 / L, prothrombin activity \< 50%)
    • Presence of any other form of chronic liver, at the time of MASLD diagnosis.
  2. - Clinical Use case 2: MASLD and progression of cardiovascular diseases

    • Association with another cause of liver disease
    • History of hepatitis B or C
    • Already known coronary artery disease
    • History of cardiovascular events

3.1- Clinical Use case 3-TIPS: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who receive TIPS placement.

  • Non-cirrhosis TIPS
  • Portosinusoidal vascular disease
  • Complete portal vein thrombosis
  • Patients with surgical porto-caval shunts.
  • Patients with evidence of current locally advanced or metastatic malignancy
  • Patients with acute or chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA]).
  • Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD grade III/IV
  • Patients with chronic kidney disease requiring renal replacement therapy
  • Patients with a known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or have clinical signs and symptoms consistent with current HIV infection
  • Patients with previous liver transplantation
  • Patients lost to follow-up and therefore have an incomplete 1-year follow-up

3.2.- Clinical Use Case 3-LT: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who received liver transplantation.

  • Patients who were transplanted due to acute liver failure.
  • Patients who were already transplanted before (retransplant)
  • Patients who are lost to follow-up in the first 5 years after liver transplant.

    4.- Clinical Use Case 4: Prediction of cardiac complications due to HCC treatments* (*Note: includes surgical interventions, ablation, TACE, TARE, SIRT and immunotherapies)

  • Mixed-tumor HCC based on radiological and/or pathological examination
  • Uncontrolled inter-current illness or psychiatric illness or social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Subjects with history of another primary cancer
  • Fully recovered from any prior surgery and/or radiation and none within 2 weeks of initiating treatment.
  • Subjects with active hepatitis B or C on antiviral compounds may remain on such treatment, except for interferon.
  • Subjects with diagnosis of tumor of mixed origin, either from radiological or biopsy report.

    5.- Other populations (participation in control arms)

  • Patients with diagnosis of MASLD
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
7,720 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • ARTEMIs cohort

    * Clinical Use Case #1\& 2: Adult patients diagnosed with MASLD/MASH. Clinical Use Case #2, subgroup of patients with cardiovascular disease: Adult patients diagnosed with cardiac fibrosis, with or without MASLD. * Clinical Use Case #3: Adult patients diagnosed with cirrhosis. * Clinical Use Case #4: Adult patients diagnosed with HCC. * Control group: Adult patients with neither liver conditions nor cardiovascular events, as healthy control for the ARTEMIs models.

    Other: Data recollection

Interventions

  • OtherData recollection

    Only data recollection for their use in the training, testing and early validation of computational models (but no other intervention) will be performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Liver disease progression and regression in MASLD patients

    Probability rates of liver disease progression or regression in MASLD patients, including fibrosis stage changes and development of steatohepatitis (MASH), assessed using validated non-invasive tests, imaging techniques, and liver histology when available

    Time frame: From baseline assessment to last available follow-up (minimum 1 year, up to 5 years)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of cardiovascular events in MASLD patients

    Occurrence of cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure in MASLD patients during retrospective follow-up.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years after baseline assessment

Other outcomes

  1. Cardiovascular complications following TIPS placement or liver transplantation

    Incidence of cardiac events, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, symptomatic coronary heart disease, and arrhythmias, in patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS placement or liver transplantation.

    Time frame: From intervention to 1 year (TIPS) and up to 5 years (liver transplantation)

  2. Cardiac complications associated with hepatocellular carcinoma treatments

    Occurrence of cardiac-related adverse events following surgical, locoregional, or systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after HCC treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Vall d´Hebron Institute de Recerca (VHIR)
    Barcelona, Barcelona 08035, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cui TM, Liu Y, Wang JB, Liu LX. Adverse Effects of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2020 Nov 16;13:11725-11740. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S279858. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33235462 ↗
  • Porcu M, De Silva P, Solinas C, Battaglia A, Schena M, Scartozzi M, Bron D, Suri JS, Willard-Gallo K, Sangiolo D, Saba L. Immunotherapy Associated Pulmonary Toxicity: Biology Behind Clinical and Radiological Features. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 5;11(3):305. doi: 10.3390/cancers11030305. PubMed 30841554 ↗
  • Shalata W, Abu-Salman A, Steckbeck R, Mathew Jacob B, Massalha I, Yakobson A. Cardiac Toxicity Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 18;13(20):5218. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205218. PubMed 34680365 ↗
  • Chung WB, Youn JC, Youn HJ. Cardiovascular Complications of Novel Anti-Cancer Immunotherapy: Old Problems from New Agents? Korean Circ J. 2020 Sep;50(9):743-753. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0158. Epub 2020 May 27. PubMed 32725983 ↗
  • Liu KL, Chen JS, Chen SC, Chu PH. Cardiovascular Toxicity of Molecular Targeted Therapy in Cancer Patients: A Double-Edged Sword. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2013 Jul;29(4):295-303. PubMed 27122721 ↗
  • Llovet JM, Castet F, Heikenwalder M, Maini MK, Mazzaferro V, Pinato DJ, Pikarsky E, Zhu AX, Finn RS. Immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar;19(3):151-172. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00573-2. Epub 2021 Nov 11. PubMed 34764464 ↗
  • Ali SA, Arman HE, Shamseddeen H, Elsner N, Elsemesmani H, Johnson S, Zenisek J, Khemka A, Jarori U, Patidar KR, Orman E, Kubal C, Frick K. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: Predictors of major adverse cardiac events and assessment of reversibility after liver transplant. J Cardiol. 2023 Aug;82(2):113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 20. PubMed 37085028 ↗
  • Qureshi W, Mittal C, Ahmad U, Alirhayim Z, Hassan S, Qureshi S, Khalid F. Clinical predictors of post-liver transplant new-onset heart failure. Liver Transpl. 2013 Jul;19(7):701-10. doi: 10.1002/lt.23654. Epub 2013 Jun 3. PubMed 23554120 ↗
  • Snowden CP, Hughes T, Rose J, Roberts DR. Pulmonary edema in patients after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2000 Jul;6(4):466-70. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2000.7580. PubMed 10915170 ↗
  • Mohammadi F, Ramachandran J, Woodman R, Muller K, John L, Chen J, Wigg A. Impact of cardiac dysfunction on morbidity and mortality in liver transplant candidates. Clin Transplant. 2022 Jul;36(7):e14682. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14682. Epub 2022 May 16. PubMed 35441375 ↗
  • Sonny A, Govindarajan SR, Jaber WA, Cywinski JB. Systolic heart failure after liver transplantation: Incidence, predictors, and outcome. Clin Transplant. 2018 Mar;32(3):e13199. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13199. Epub 2018 Feb 1. PubMed 29323769 ↗
  • Rajesh S, George T, Philips CA, Ahamed R, Kumbar S, Mohan N, Mohanan M, Augustine P. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhosis: An exhaustive critical update. World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 7;26(37):5561-5596. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i37.5561. PubMed 33088154 ↗
  • Modha K, Kapoor B, Lopez R, Sands MJ, Carey W. Symptomatic Heart Failure After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement: Incidence, Outcomes, and Predictors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Apr;41(4):564-571. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1848-1. Epub 2017 Nov 27. PubMed 29181605 ↗
  • Ali A, Sarwar A, Patwardhan VR, Fraiche AM, Tahir MM, Luo M, Weinstein JL, Hussain MS, Curry MP, Ahmed M. Echocardiographic and Other Preprocedural Predictors of Heart Failure After TIPS Placement in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Single-Center 15-Year Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Jul;219(1):110-118. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26947. Epub 2022 Feb 16. PubMed 35170360 ↗
  • Billey C, Billet S, Robic MA, Cognet T, Guillaume M, Vinel JP, Peron JM, Lairez O, Bureau C. A Prospective Study Identifying Predictive Factors of Cardiac Decompensation After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: The Toulouse Algorithm. Hepatology. 2019 Dec;70(6):1928-1941. doi: 10.1002/hep.30934. PubMed 31512743 ↗
  • Moye L. What can we do about exploratory analyses in clinical trials? Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt B):302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Sep 25. PubMed 26390962 ↗
  • van Kleef LA, Kavousi M, de Knegt RJ. Reply to: "Liver stiffness, fatty liver disease and atrial fibrillation in the Rotterdam study: Some issues". J Hepatol. 2022 Nov;77(5):1467-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.07.030. Epub 2022 Aug 18. No abstract available. PubMed 35985548 ↗
  • Simon TG, Roelstraete B, Alkhouri N, Hagstrom H, Sundstrom J, Ludvigsson JF. Cardiovascular disease risk in paediatric and young adult non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2023 Mar;72(3):573-580. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328105. Epub 2022 Dec 15. PubMed 36522149 ↗
  • Mantovani F, Clavel MA, Michelena HI, Suri RM, Schaff HV, Enriquez-Sarano M. Comprehensive Imaging in Women With Organic Mitral Regurgitation: Implications for Clinical Outcome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.017. PubMed 27056158 ↗
  • Sanyal AJ, Van Natta ML, Clark J, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Diehl A, Dasarathy S, Loomba R, Chalasani N, Kowdley K, Hameed B, Wilson LA, Yates KP, Belt P, Lazo M, Kleiner DE, Behling C, Tonascia J; NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN). Prospective Study of Outcomes in Adults with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 21;385(17):1559-1569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2029349. PubMed 34670043 ↗
  • Allen AM, Therneau TM, Ahmed OT, Gidener T, Mara KC, Larson JJ, Canning RE, Benson JT, Kamath PS. Clinical course of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the implications for clinical trial design. J Hepatol. 2022 Nov;77(5):1237-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 16. PubMed 35843374 ↗
  • Singh SP, Misra B, Kar SK, Panigrahi MK, Misra D, Bhuyan P, Pattnaik K, Meher C, Agrawal O, Rout N, Swain M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) without insulin resistance: Is it different? Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;39(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Dec 17. PubMed 25543522 ↗
  • Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 Jun 9;313(22):2263-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5370. PubMed 26057287 ↗
  • Cvitanovic T, Reichert MC, Moskon M, Mraz M, Lammert F, Rozman D. Large-scale computational models of liver metabolism: How far from the clinics? Hepatology. 2017 Oct;66(4):1323-1334. doi: 10.1002/hep.29268. Epub 2017 Aug 30. PubMed 28520105 ↗
  • Tsochatzis EA. Natural history of NAFLD: knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;19(3):151-152. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00565-8. No abstract available. PubMed 34880412 ↗
  • Ekstedt M, Nasr P, Kechagias S. Natural History of NAFLD/NASH. Curr Hepatol Rep. 2017;16(4):391-397. doi: 10.1007/s11901-017-0378-2. Epub 2017 Nov 13. PubMed 29984130 ↗
  • Pais R, Maurel T. Natural History of NAFLD. J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 10;10(6):1161. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061161. PubMed 33802047 ↗
  • Yuan Q, Wang H, Gao P, Chen W, Lv M, Bai S, Wu J. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease among 73,566 Individuals in Beijing, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 13;19(4):2096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042096. PubMed 35206282 ↗
  • Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, Zelber-Sagi S, Wai-Sun Wong V, Dufour JF, Schattenberg JM, Kawaguchi T, Arrese M, Valenti L, Shiha G, Tiribelli C, Yki-Jarvinen H, Fan JG, Gronbaek H, Yilmaz Y, Cortez-Pinto H, Oliveira CP, Bedossa P, Adams LA, Zheng MH, Fouad Y, Chan WK, Mendez-Sanchez N, Ahn SH, Castera L, Bugianesi E, Ratziu V, George J. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020 Jul;73(1):202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039. Epub 2020 Apr 8. PubMed 32278004 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07430501
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Collaborators
Matical Innovation SL, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Jena University Hospital, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, German Cancer Research Center, MEDEX, EUROPEAN LIVER PATIENTS ASSOCIATION, Betthera s.r.o., Bournemouth University, University Hospital Heidelberg, Fundacion Para La Investigacion Hospital La Fe, University of Roma La Sapienza, Charite University, Berlin, Germany, Medical University of Vienna, Saint-Luc University Hospital, University of Freiburg, University of Leipzig, Sheba Medical Center, Imperial College London
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
Start date
Feb 23, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Jose Raul Herance, PhD
Contact
raul.herance@vhir.org
937372444 ext. 9344

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion