ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07420166Updated Feb 19, 2026

Comparison of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide Treatment With Intralesional Verapamil Hydrochloride in Keloids

An interventional study of Triamcinolone Acetonide and Verapamil Hydrochloride in Keloid, sponsored by Muhammad Aamir Latif. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-19.

Sponsored by Muhammad Aamir Latif · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Feb 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The paucity of local literature regarding the comparison of intralesional verapamil with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide led this study to be carried out with the objective of comparing the clinical effectiveness of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and intralesional verapamil hydrochloride in patients with keloids.

Read the detailed description

Although the anti-inflammatory and scar-enhancing properties of corticosteroids on hypertrophic scars and keloids have been investigated and documented thoroughly. There are many different treatments for keloids nowadays; each method has its advantages and disadvantages, and the results also vary depending on each study. Moreover, local data to address this issue is also scarce. The findings of this study would not add to the existing stats, but comparing the outcomes of both the drugs would also guide clinicians towards better management of keloids by choosing the more appropriate treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Keloid

Browse trials for

03

In context

Keloid

138 studies on the registry are indexed under Keloid; 26 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 30 across 109 interventional studies indexed under Keloid.

Browse Keloid studies →

Lead sponsor

Muhammad Aamir Latif is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Either gender
  • Aged between 20 and 60 years
  • With keloids
  • Benign dermal growths
  • Scar length not exceeding 5 centimeters
  • Keloid duration of five years or less
  • A baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score of 5 or more

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • A family history of keloids
  • Diagnosed with conditions such as acromegaly, diabetes mellitus, or congestive cardiac disease
  • a history of thyroidectomy
  • Current or recent use of isotretinoin or anabolic steroids, as determined by history, physical examination, blood glucose analysis, and electrocardiography
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Triamcinolone Group

    Patients received intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/mL) at a volume not exceeding 1.5 cc per session every three weeks, for a maximum of eight sessions or until complete scar flattening. Each injection session was preceded by 20 seconds of cryotherapy using cryospray applied at a distance of one centimeter from the lesion.

    Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide

  • Experimental
    Verapamil Group

    Patients were managed with intralesional verapamil hydrochloride (2.5 mg/ml) at a volume not exceeding 1.5 cc per session every three weeks, for a maximum of eight sessions or until complete scar flattening. Each injection session was preceded by 20 seconds of cryotherapy using cryospray applied at a distance of one centimeter from the lesion.

    Drug: Verapamil Hydrochloride

Interventions

  • Patients received intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/ml) at a volume not exceeding 1.5 cc per session every three weeks, for a maximum of eight sessions or until complete scar flattening. Each injection session was preceded by 20 seconds of cryotherapy using cryospray applied at a distance of one centimeter from the lesion.

  • Patients were managed with intralesional verapamil hydrochloride (2.5 mg/ml) at a volume not exceeding 1.5 cc per session every three weeks, for a maximum of eight sessions or until complete scar flattening. Each injection session was preceded by 20 seconds of cryotherapy using cryospray applied at a distance of one centimeter from the lesion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Scar assessment

    Using the Vancouver Scar Scale, height, vascularity, pliability, and pigmentation were assessed at baseline and compared with post-treatment measures at 24 weeks. A score closer to 0 was deemed as better vascularity (not red), low pigmentation, high pliability (soft), and low thickness.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quaid-e-Azam Medical College
    Bahawalpur, Punjab Province 63100, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data can be shared on a reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2025 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 5 months.

Of 20 interventional studies with no phase under Keloid, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36. This study's 5 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 12, 2026
First posted
Feb 19, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Feb 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07420166
Lead sponsor
Muhammad Aamir Latif
Responsible party
Muhammad Aamir Latif (Research Consultant, RESnTEC, Institute of Research) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 19, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Feb 19, 2026

Study contacts

Bakhtawar
principal investigator · Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur
Salman Ashraf, FCPS
study director · Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Triamcinolone Acetonide · Verapamil

Start the discussion